access to imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine-2-ones9 or benzimidazol-
2-ones10 by palladium or copper catalysis.11 In these
reactions the formations of the cyclic urea units occur
either by metal-catalyzed N-arylation or coupling of am-
monia with 2-iodoacetanilides followed by acid-catalyzed
cyclization.12 Also here, elevated temperatures (>80 °C)
and additional activation modes such as microwave irra-
diation were required. We now developed a transition-
metal-free base-promoted intramolecular N-arylation of
ureas to form benzimidazol-2-ones.13ꢀ16 Noteworthy, it
utilizes simple KOH in DMSO, takes place at close to
ambient temperature, and is applicable to a wide range of
substrates. The results of our studies are described herein.
Initially, the reaction conditions were optimized by
examining the conversion of 1-benzyl-1-(2-iodophenyl)-
3- phenylurea (1a), synthesized by a transition-metal-free
two-step procedure from 2-iodoaniline,17 into 1-benzyl-3-
phenyl-1,3-dihydro-benzoimidazole-2-one (2a) (Table 1).
80 °C resulted in complete decomposition of the starting
material (entry 1). At room temperature the cyclization
was slow, and after the standard 24 h reaction time product
2a was isolated in only 67% yield. It required an additional
20 h to reach a yield of 84% (Table 1, entries 3 and 4,
respectively). The use of 2 equiv of KOH proved essential.
Decreasing the amount of the base to 1 equiv led to a
significant reduction in yield (entry 6).
Encouraged by these results, various phenyl ureas were
synthesized and submitted to the KOHꢀDMSO mixture
to determine the scope and the limitations of the cycliza-
tion method. Table 2 shows the data.
Pleasingly, a wide variety of products were accessible
under the optimized reaction conditions, and commonly
good to excellent yields were achieved. As demonstrated
for the synthesis of benzimidazol-2-one 2a the product
could be obtained not only by starting from iodo-substi-
tuted phenyl urea 1a but also through cyclizations of the
analogous bromo, chloro, and fluoro derivatives 1bꢀd,
respectively (Table 2, entries 1ꢀ3). Compared to the
conversion of 1a transformations of the latter halo phenyl
ureas were less effective, but nevertheless yields of up to
79% were achieved here as well. Attempts to cyclize less
substituted urea 1e (where R2 = H) remained unsuccess-
ful, and after 24 h the entire amount of starting material
was recovered (Table 2, entry 4).18 This result showed that
an N,N,N0-trisubstitution of the urea core in 2 was critical
for the cyclization (Table 2, entry 4). With respect to the
N-substituent R2 we were pleased to find that both alkyl
(methyl, entries 10 and 16) and benzyl groups were toler-
ated. The latter could have additional aryl substituents
which appeared to have no significant influence on the
cyclization toward the corresponding benzimidazol-2-ones
2 (entries 9, 11, 12). Substrates with additional chloro or
bromo substituents (R1) at the 4-position of the 2-halo-
phenyl moiety showed reactivity differences, but in all
cases the products were formed well reaching a yield of
93% in the synthesis of chloro-substituted 2i (Table 2,
entry 13). Comparing the cyclization results of 2-iodo
derivatives 1a (R1 = H), 1n (R1 = Cl), and 1p (R1 = Br)
revealed that the latter process was the most difficult
one leading to product 2j in only 78% yield (Table 2,
entry 15). Variations of the N0-aryl (R3) indicated that
substituents in the para position had almost no effect on
the product yield (Table 2, entries 5ꢀ8, 19). One excep-
tion is nothworthy: The cyclization of p-methoxy-sub-
stituted 1h provided the corresponding product 2d in
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
entry
KOH (equiv)
t °C, 24 h
yield %a
1
2
3
4
5
6
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
80
40
rt
decomp.
89 (98)b
67
rt
84c
40
40
88d
23
a After column chromatography; use of 0.234 mmol of 1a. b In
parentheses, yield from a reaction with 0.700 mmol of 1a. c Reaction
time: 44 h. d Reaction time: 6 h.
To our delight, the reaction proceeded well, and in the
presence of 2 equiv of KOH in DMSO at 40 °C a smooth
cyclization occurred providing the product in up to 98%
yield(Table1, entry 2). Attemptstoperformthe reaction at
(10) Barbero, N.; Carril, M.; SanMartin, R.; Domı
hedron 2008, 64, 7283.
(11) For Pd-catalyzed reactions, see: (a) Xu, X.-J.; Zong, Y.-X.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 129. (b) Benedı, C.; Bravo, F.; Uriz, P.;
´
nguez, E. Tetra-
´
ꢀ
ꢀ
Fernandez, E.; Claver, C.; Castillon, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6073.
For Cu-catalyzed reactions, see: (c) Li, Z.; Sun, H.; Jiang, H.; Liu, H.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3263. (d) Zou, B.; Yuan, Q.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 4291. For a general review, see: (e) Sadig, J. E. R.; Willis, M. C.
Synthesis 2011, 1.
(16) Great care was taken to avoid the presence of trace metals in the
reaction mixture. Those measures included the transition-metal-free
synthesis of the starting materials, reagent transfers with plastic spatulas,
and the use of new glassware for the cyclization reactions. Such precautions
appeared advisable in light of the recent reports on trace metal effects on
cross-coupling reactions. For examples, see: (a) Buchwald, S. L.; Bolm, C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5586. (b) Larsson, P.-F.; Correa, A.;
Carril, M.; Norrby, P.-O.; Bolm, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5691.
(c) Leadbeater, N. E. Nature Chem. 2010, 2, 1007.
(12) Diao, X.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, D. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
7974.
(13) For a review on KOHꢀDMSO mixtures as “superbases”, see:
Trofimov, B. A. Sulfur Rep. 1992, 74, 207.
(14) For an interesting early observation, see: Heaney, H.; Ley, S. V.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1973, 499.
(17) Clayden, J.; Turner, H.; Pickworth, M.; Adler, T. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 3147.
(15) (a) For an initial study on the use of KOHꢀDMSO mixtures,
ꢀ
see: Yuan, Y.; Thome, I.; Kim, S. H.; Chen, D.; Beyer, A.; Bonnamour,
J.; Zuidema, E.; Chang, S.; Bolm, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2892.
(18) Also attempted cyclizations of 1e with 3 or 4 equiv of KOH (at
40 °C) remained unsuccessful. At 100 °C (using 2 equiv of KOH) only
traces of 2b were detected after 22.5 h.
ꢀ
(b) For a related study, see: Cano, R.; Ramon, D. J.; Yus, M. J. Org.
Chem. 2011, 76, 654.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 11, 2011
2877