RuCl3·3H2O catalyzed reactions: Facile synthesis of bis(indolyl)methanes under mild conditions

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules16053855

RuCl₃·3H₂O was found to be an effective catalyst for reactions of indoles, 2-methylthiophene, and 2-methylfuran with aldehydes to afford the corresponding bis(indolyl)methanes, bis(thienyl) methanes, and bis(fur-2-yl)methanes in mode

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules16053855

Molecules 2011, 16, 3855-3868; doi:10.3390/molecules16053855
OPEN ACCESS
molecules
ISSN 1420-3049
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules
Article
RuCl3·3H2O Catalyzed Reactions: Facile Synthesis of
Bis(indolyl)methanes under Mild Conditions
Hong-En Qu, Chen Xiao, Ning Wang, Kai-Hui Yu, Qiao-Sheng Hu * and Liang-Xian Liu *
Department of Chemistry and Biology, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China;
E-Mails: quhongen-2003@163.com (H.-E.Q.); xiaocen1219@163.com (C.X.);
wangning198415@126.com (N.W.); ykh506@163.com (K.-H.Y.)
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: lxliu@mail.xmu.edu.cn (L.-X.L.);
huqiaosheng@yahoo.com.cn (Q.-S.H.); Tel.: +86-797-839-7630; Fax: +86-797-839-3670.
Received: 23 March 2011; in revised form: 20 April 2011 / Accepted: 25 April 2011 /
Published: 9 May 2011
Abstract: RuCl3·3H2O was found to be an effective catalyst for reactions of indoles,
2-methylthiophene, and 2-methylfuran with aldehydes to afford the corresponding
bis(indolyl)methanes, bis(thienyl)methanes, and bis(fur-2-yl)methanes in moderate to
excellent yields. Experimental results indicated that mono(indolyl)methanol is not the
reaction intermediate under these reaction conditions.
Keywords: bis(indolyl)methane; RuCl3·3H2O; aldehyde; indole
1. Introduction
Indoles and their derivatives are known to possess various pharmacological and biological
properties, including antibacterial, cytotoxic, antioxidative, and insecticidal activities [1,2].
Furthermore, bis(indolyl)alkanes and their derivatives constitute an important group of bioactive
metabolites of terrestrial and marine origin [3-8]. During the past decade a large number of natural
products containing bis(indolyl)methanes [9] and bis(indolyl)ethanes [10] have been isolated from
marine sources. Consequently, a number of synthetic methods for the preparation of bis(indolyl)alkane
derivatives by reacting indoles with various aldehydes and ketones in the presence of either a Lewis
acid [11] or a protic acid [12-14], metal salts, such as In(OTf)3 [15], Dy(OTf)3 [16,17], Ln(OTf)3 [18],
and CeCl3·7H2O [19,20], and molecular iodine [21,22], as well as solid acidic catalysts [23-25], such
as clays and Zeolites, have been reported in the literature. In addition, it has been reported that the

Molecules 2011, 16
3856
reactions of indoles with various aldehydes were carried out in a protic solvent in the absence of any
other catalyst to afford bis(indolyl)methanes [26]. In this study, we report a facile and efficient
procedure for the synthesis of bis(indolyl)methanes, bis(thienyl)methanes, and bis(fur-2-yl)methanes
under mild conditions using RuCl3·3H2O as catalyst.
2. Results and Discussion
In the first instance, we studied the reaction of indole with benzaldehyde as a model reaction. We
found that this reaction was fast in the presence of RuCl3·3H2O (5 mol%) in ethylene glycol dimethyl
ether (GDE) at room temperature, and the corresponding bis-indolylmethane was obtained in 87%
yield after 30 min (Table 1, entry 6).
Table 1. Effect of RuCl3·3H2O loading a.
H
N
CHO
RuCl3 3H2O
+
rt
N
H
N
H
Entry
RuCl3·3H2O [equivalents]
Solvent
Benzene
Benzene
Benzene
Benzene
Benzene
GDE c
THF
DCM
Chloroform
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Yield [%] b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.1
0.05
0.03
0.02
0
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
93
92
75
60
0
87
88
87
86
83
89
10
11
a
The reaction was performed with benzaldehyde (0.5 mmol), indole (1 mmol) and RuCl3·3H2O
(0.05 mmol) in 1 mL of solvent at rt for 30 min. b Isolated yield. c Ethylene glycol dimethyl ether.
To optimize the reaction conditions, we have studied the effect of different solvents and
RuCl3·3H2O loadings on the reaction of indole with benzaldehyde. The results are shown in Table 1.
After examining different solvents, including THF, GDE, CH2Cl2, C6H6, acetone, acetonitrile, and
CHCl3, benzene, with which the highest yield of 92% was obtained when using 5 mol % RuCl3·3H2O
for 30 min (Table 1, entry 2), was found to be most efficient. We next examined the effect of
RuCl3·3H2O loading on the reaction; good results were obtained when using 5 mol % RuCl3·3H2O
(Table 1, entry 2), and there was no advantage to using more than 5 mol % RuCl3·3H2O (Table 1, entry 1),
whereas the yield significantly decreased when using only 2 mol % RuCl3·3H2O (Table 1, entry 4).
Without the RuCl3·3H2O catalyst, the reaction cannot be carried out. Thus, the optimum reaction
conditions for the reaction were found to be 0.05 equivalents of RuCl3·3H2O, with benzene as the solvent

Molecules 2011, 16
3857
at r.t. To explore the scope of the reaction, next various indoles were reacted with different substituted
aromatic aldehydes, and the results are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. RuCl3·3H2O-catalyzed reaction of indoles with aldehydes a.
H
N
R2
R2
R1
CHO
2 R2 = H
3 R2= N-CH3
4 R2 = 2-CH3
RuCl3 3H2O
C6H6 , rt
R1
+
R2
N
H
1
N
H
Entry
1
Compounds
R1
H
m-CH3
p-CH3
m-OCH3
m-Cl
o-Br
m-NO2
H
m-CH3
p-CH3
m-OCH3
m-Cl
R2
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Time/h
Yield [%] b
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2g
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
0.5
1
1
92
77
83
81
93
89
98
75
70
70
73
81
78
85
80
78
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
N-CH3
N-CH3
N-CH3
N-CH3
N-CH3
N-CH3
N-CH3
2-CH3
2-CH3
o-Br
3g
4a
4b
m-NO2
m-CH3
m-OCH3
0.5
0.5
a
The reaction was performed with aldehyde (0.5 mmol), indole (1 mmol) and RuCl3·3H2O
(0.05 mmol) in 1 mL of benzene at rt. b Isolated yield.
In general, all reactions were very clean and the bis-indolylmethanes were obtained in high yields
under the optimized conditions. The results have shown that substitution plays a major role in
governing the reactivity of the substrate. With electron-donating substituents in the aryl aldehyde,
decreased yields of products were observed (Table 2, entries 2–4, entries 9–11). For example, the
reaction of m-methylbenzaldehyde with indole gave the corresponding product in 77% yield (Table 2,
entry 2). However, the effect was reversed when electron-withdrawing groups were present in the aryl
aldehyde, thus such electron-withdrawing groups (e.g., NO2) in the aryl aldehyde favored the reaction
with indoles, affording the corresponding bis(indolyl)methanes in high yields (Table 2, entries 7, 14).
It is noteworthy that the reaction of N-methylindole with aryl aldehydes gave the corresponding
bis(indolyl)methanes in decreased yields (Table 2, entries 8–14). To expand the scope of the protocol,
the reaction of various aryl aldehydes with 2-methylthiophene was also evaluated. The results are
summarized in Table 3.
As shown in this table, good yields were obtained in GDE at 80 °C, except in the case of
p-methyl-benzaldehyde (Table 3, entry 3). Surprisingly, applying these optimised conditions to

Molecules 2011, 16
3858
perform the reaction of aryl aldehydes with 2-methylthiophene，resulted in a zero yield of the
corresponding bis(thienyl)methanes, and in this case the reaction temperature must be changed, and 80 °C
was the best choice. Steric effects also had an adverse influence on the reaction. For instance,
2-bromo-benzaldehyde gave a lower yield of 61% (Table 3, entry 3).
Table 3. RuCl3·3H2O-catalyzed reaction of 2-methyl thiophene with aryl aldehydes a.
S
CHO
+
RuCl3 3H2O
GDE, 80 oC
S
S
R
R
1
5
Entry
Compounds
R
H
Time/h
6.5
Yield [%] b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
5f
96
90
61
81
84
75
98
m-CH3
p-CH3
m-OCH3
m-Cl
o-Br
m-NO2
6.0
13
7.5
13
5.5
9.0
5g
a
The reaction was performed with aldehyde (0.5 mmol), 2-methyl thiophene (1.5 mmol) and
RuCl3·3H2O (0.05 mmol) in 1 mL of GDE at 80 °C. b Isolated yield.
Nair has reported that 2-methylthiophene on reaction with benzaldehyde gave 70% of the
corresponding bis(thienyl)methane using AuCl3/AgOTf as catalyst [27]. Compared to Nair’s method, the
advantages of our procedure include the simplicity of the reaction procedure, as well as higher yields. In
addition, the reaction of various aryl aldehydes with 2-methylfuran was also investigated. The results
are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4. RuCl3·3H2O-catalyzed reaction of 2-methyl furan with aryl aldehydes a.
O
CHO
+
RuCl3 3H2O
GDE, 5 oC
O
O
R
R
1
6
Entry
Compounds
R
Time/days
Yield [%] b
1
2
3
4
5
6
6a
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
m-CH3
p-CH3
m-OCH3
m-Cl
o-Br
m-NO2
14
14
14
9
13
6
49
52
50
58
56
79
a The reaction was performed with aldehyde (0.5 mmol), 2-methyl furan (6 mmol) and RuCl3·3H2O
(0.05 mmol) in 1 mL of GDE at 5 °CoC. b Isolated yield.
Similarly, applying the previously optimized conditions to perform the reaction of m-methylbenzaldehyde
with 2-methylfuran, resulted in a very low yield of the corresponding bis(fur-2-yl)methane.

Molecules 2011, 16
3859
Fortunately, a mixture of m-methylbenzaldehyde and 2-methylfuran could be very slowly converted to
the desired product in 49% yield after 14 days at 5 °C. Other aryl benzaldehydes also reacted well
giving moderate yields under the same conditions (Table 4). Electron-withdrawing substituents on the
aryl aldehyde were more beneficial for this transformation. For instance, m-nitro- benzaldehyde gave a
higher reaction yield of 79% (Table 4, entry 6). To the best of our knowledge, the reports of such
reactions of furans with aryl benzaldehydes are limited [27].
A Hammett analysis was performed to probe the nature of this intriguing reaction of aryl aldehydes
with N-methylindole. As can be observed from the plot for C-3 substituted benzaldehydes (Figure 1), a
linear correlation between the ratio of reaction rates (kn = rate constant of the reaction of benzaldehyde
with N-methyl indole; km = rate constant of the reaction of aryl benzaldehyde with N-methyl indole;
For the determination of r, the following expression was used: km/kn = log[1−xp/xr]/log[1−yp/yr],
r = reaction constant; xp = mmol product formed from substituted benzaldehyde; xr = mmol starting
N-methyl indole placed in the reaction; yp = mmol product formed from unsubstituted benzaldehyde;
yr = mmol N-methyl indole starting placed in the reaction.) and the substituent parameter (δm) [28] was
obtained, which provided a small, positive reaction constant (ρ = 0.26). This relatively small ρ value
correlates to a slight dependence of the reaction on the polarizing influence of the aromatic
substituents, which is indicative of a nucleophilic addition mechanism.
Figure 1. Hammett plot for C-3 substituted benzaldehydes.
According to the literature [18,21,22,24], the following mechanism was proposed to account for the
reaction of benzaldehyde with indole. The aldehyde was first activated by catalyst, then underwent an
electrophilic substitution reaction at C-3 of an indole molecules to give mono(indolyl)methane 7. After
loss of water, intermediate 8 was generated. Compound 8 served as an electrophile to attack a second
molecule of indole to form 2a. To explore the RuCl3·3H2O-catalyzed reaction process, the reaction
of mono(indolyl)methanes 7 with indole was performed in the presence of RuCl3·3H2O at r.t.
Unfortunately, it was found that the reaction did not work, suggesting that 7 is not the intermediate of
the RuCl3·3H2O-catalyzed reaction. The detailed mechanism has therefore not been clarified.

Molecules 2011, 16
3860
Scheme 1. The reaction of mono(indolyl)methanes with indole.
H
N
OH
RuCl3
3H Ox
2
N
NH
+
Benzene, rt
N
H
8
7
2a
N
H
3. Experimental
3.1. General
Infrared spectra were measured with a Nicolet Avatar 360 FT-IR spectrometer using film KBr pellet
1
techniques. H- and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV400 spectrometer at 400 and
100 MHz, respectively. Chemical shifts were reported in ppm relative to TMS. CDCl3 or DMSO-d6
were used as the NMR solvents. GC-MS were recorded using a Finnigan Trace 2000 GC/MS system.
Elemental analysis were carried out on a Perkin-Elmer 240B instrument. HRMS spectra were recorded
on a Shimadzu LCMS-IT-TOF apparatus. Silica gel (300–400 mesh) was used for flash column
chromatography, eluting (unless otherwise stated) with an ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (PE, b.p.
60–90 °C) mixture.
3.2. General Procedure for the Preparation of Bis(indolyl)Methanes 2-4
To a solution of aryl benzaldehyde (0.5 mmol) and RuCl3·3H2O (0.05 mmol) in benzene (1 mL)
was added indole (1.0 mmol) under air atmosphere and the mixture was stirred at room temperature
(monitored by TLC). Then, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was
purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (eluent:EtOAc/PE = 1:4) to yield the corresponding product.
3,3’-Bis-indolyl phenylmethane (2a). Pink solid, mp: 126–127 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4) (lit [29], 125–127 °C).
IR (KBr) νmax: 3417, 3065, 1513, 1454 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.82 (s, 2H, N–H), 7.43 (d, J = 7.9 Hz,
2H, Ar–H), 7.40–7.36 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 7.35–7.29 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 1H, Ar–H), 7.21 (dt,
J = 0.8, 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.05 (dt, J = 0.8, 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.61 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 2H, Ar–H),
5.92 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 144.0, 136.7, 128.8, 128.3, 127.1, 126.2, 123.7, 121.9, 120.0, 119.7,
119.2, 111.1, 40.2. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 322 (M+, 20), 245 (75), 206 (100), 77 (10).
3,3’-Bis-indolyl-(3-methylphenyl)methane (2b). Pink solid, mp: 98–99 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4). IR (KBr)
ν
max: 3406, 3049, 1610, 1458, 1419, 745 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.88 (s, 2H, N–H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.9 Hz,
2H, Ar–H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.20–7.14 (m, 5H, Ar–H), 7.05–6.99 (m, 3H, Ar–H),
13
6.66 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 5.85 (s, 1H), 2.30 (s, 3H, CH3). C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 143.9, 137.6,
136.7, 129.5, 128.1, 127.1, 126.9, 125.8, 123.6, 121.9, 120.0, 119.8, 119.2, 111.0, 40.1, 21.5. MS
(EI, 70 eV): m/z = 336 (M+, 30), 245 (100), 221 (30). Anal. calcd. for C24H20N2: C, 85.68; H, 5.99;
N, 8.33. Found C, 85.30; H, 5.87; N, 8.05.

Molecules 2011, 16
3861
3,3’-Bis-indolyl-(4-methylphenyl)methane (2c). Pink solid, mp: 93–95 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4) (lit [30],
1
94–96 °C). IR (KBr) νmax: 3410, 3046, 1457, 743 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.89 (s, 2H, N–H), 7.42
(d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.18 (dt,
J = 1.0, 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.10 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.02 (dt, J = 1.0, 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.66
13
(dd, J = 2.2, 0.7 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 5.87 (s, 1H), 2.34 (s, 3H, CH3). C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 141.0, 136.7,
135.5, 128.9, 128.6, 127.1, 123.5, 121.9, 120.0, 119.9, 119.2, 111.0, 39.8, 21.1. MS (EI, 70 eV):
m/z = 336 (M+, 35), 245 (100), 220 (35), 116 (10).
3,3’-Bis-indolyl-(3-methoxyphenyl)methane (2d). Pink solid, mp: 188.5–189.5 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4).
1
IR (KBr) νmax: 3410, 3046, 2923, 1487, 1441, 1263, 1152, 1049, 745 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.91
(s, 2H, N–H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H,
Ar–H), 7.18 (dt, J = 0.9, 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.02 (dt, J = 0.9, 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.7 Hz,
1H, Ar–H), 6.93 (t, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 6.77 (dq, J = 0.6, 7.7 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 6.68 (dd, J = 2.2,
13
0.6 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 5.87 (s, 1H), 2.34 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.75 (s, 3H, OCH3). C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 159.6,
145.7, 136.7, 129.1, 127.1, 123.6, 121.9, 121.3, 119.9, 119.6, 119.2, 114.7, 111.3, 111.0, 55.1, 40.2.
MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 352 (M+, 35), 337 (35), 321 (8), 245 (100), 130 (40). Anal. calcd for
C24H20N2O: C, 81.79; H, 5.72; N, 7.95. Found C, 81.52; H, 5.33; N, 7.66.
3,3’-Bis-indolyl-(3-chlorophenyl)methane (2e). Pink solid, mp: 64–68 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4). IR (KBr)
1
ν
max: 3412, 3046, 1458, 1418, 1094, 744 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.88 (s, 2H, N–H), 7.42–7.34
(m, 5H, Ar–H), 7.26–7.17 (m, 5H, Ar–H), 7.04 (dt, J = 0.8, 7.8 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.62 (s, 2H, Ar–H),
5.86 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 146.2, 136.7, 134.0, 129.5, 128.8, 126.9, 126.8, 126.4, 123.6, 122.1,
119.7, 119.4, 119.0, 111.1, 40.0. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 283 (25), 281 (100), 245 (80). Anal. calcd. for
C23H17N2Cl: C, 77.41; H, 4.80; N, 7.85. Found C, 77.51; H, 4.67; N, 7.48.
3,3’-Bis-indolyl-(2-bromophenyl)methane (2f). Pink solid, mp: 89–91 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4). IR (KBr)
1
ν
max: 3411, 3043, 1443, 1022, 744 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.90 (s, 2H, N–H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.9 Hz,
1H, Ar–H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.25–7.14 (m, 4H, Ar–H),
7.10 (dt, J = 1.9, 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.04 (dt, J = 0.9, 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.62 (dd, J = 2.3, 0.9 Hz,
2H, Ar–H), 6.33 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 143.0, 136.7, 132.9, 130.5, 127.8, 127.3, 127.0, 124.8,
123.8, 122.0, 119.9, 119.3, 118.5, 111.1, 39.6. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 351 (100), 349 (100), 245 (80).
Anal. calcd. for C23H17N2Br: C, 68.84; H, 4.27; N, 6.98. Found C, 68.64; H, 4.05; N, 6.81.
3,3’-Bis-indolyl-(3-nitrophenyl)methane (2g). Pink solid, mp: 262–264 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4) (lit [29],
265–266 °C). IR (KBr) νmax: 3410, 3053, 2924, 1524, 1455, 1346, 1092, 741 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3):
δ 8.23 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 8.10 (dq, J = 1.0, 8.2 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 8.01 (s, 2H, N–H), 7.71 (d,
J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.46 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.37 (d, J = 7.9 Hz,
2H, Ar–H), 7.22 (dt, J = 0.9, 7.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.04 (dt, J = 0.9, 7.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.68 (dd,
J = 2.0, 0.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.01 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 148.5, 146.4, 136.7, 134.9, 129.2, 126.6,
123.7, 123.6, 122.3, 121.5, 119.6, 119.5, 118.3, 111.3, 40.0. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 367 (100), 321 (10),
245 (85), 122 (20). Anal calcd. for C23H17N3O2: C, 75.19; H, 4.66; N, 11.44. Found C, 75.07; H, 4.36;
N, 11.14.

Molecules 2011, 16
3862
3,3’-Bis-(N-methylindolyl)phenylmethane (3a). Pink solid, mp: 185–187 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4). IR
1
(KBr) νmax: 3046, 2930, 1607, 1474, 1329, 1125, 743 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.43 (d, J = 7.9 Hz,
2H, Ar–H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.35–7.29 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 7.26-7.21 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 7.03
13
(dt, J = 0.8, 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.57 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 5.93 (s, 1H), 3.71 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). C-NMR
(CDCl3): δ 144.5, 137.4, 128.7, 128.3, 128.2, 127.5, 126.0, 121.4, 120.1, 118.7, 118.3, 109.1, 40.1,
32.7. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 350 (M+, 100), 273 (85), 220 (25), 130 (15). Anal. calcd. for C25H22N2: C,
85.68; H, 6.33; N, 7.99. Found C, 85.90; H, 6.58; N, 7.64.
3,3’-Bis-(N-methylindolyl)-(3-methylphenyl)methane (3b). Pink waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 3049,
2932, 1475, 1123, 737 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.42 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.2 Hz,
2H, Ar–H), 7.25–7.14 (m, 5H, Ar–H), 7.07–6.99 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 6.56 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 5.87 (s, 1H), 3.70
13
(s, 6H, 2 × CH3), 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3). C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 144.4, 137.6, 137.4, 129.4, 128.2, 128.0,
127.5, 126.8, 125.7, 121.4, 120.1, 118.6, 118.4, 109.0, 40.0, 32.7, 21.6. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 364
(M+, 95), 349 (85), 273 (100), 257 (25), 130 (20). Anal. calcd. for C26H24N2: C, 85.68; H, 6.64;
N, 7.69. Found C, 85.30; H, 6.60; N, 7.36.
3,3’-Bis-(N-methylindolyl)-(4-methylphenyl)methane (3c). Pink solid, mp: 146–148 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4).
IR (KBr) νmax: 3050, 2928, 1470, 1125, 745 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.40 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H),
7.30 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.26–7.17 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 7.09 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.00 (dt,
J = 1.0, 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.54 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 5.85 (s, 1H), 3.69 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3), 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3).
13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 141.4, 137.4, 135.4, 128.9, 128.5, 128.2, 127.5, 121.4, 120.1, 118.6, 118.5,
109.0, 39.6, 32.6, 21.1. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 364 (M+, 15), 273 (100), 257 (60), 130 (60). Anal.
calcd. for C26H24N2: C, 85.68; H, 6.64; N, 7.69. Found C, 85.44; H, 6.96; N, 7.32.
3,3’-Bis-(N-methylindolyl)-(3-methoxyphenyl)methane (3d). Pink solid, mp: 149–151 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4).
IR (KBr) νmax: 3054, 2930, 1478, 1256, 1135, 740 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.42 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H,
Ar–H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.22 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H, Ar–H), 7.02 (dt, J = 0.9, 7.9 Hz, 2H,
Ar–H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 6.94 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 6.78 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.0 Hz, 1H,
Ar–H), 6.57 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 5.87 (s, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.70 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3):
δ 159.6, 146.2, 137.4, 129.1, 128.2, 127.5, 121.4, 121.3, 120.0, 118.6, 118.1, 114.8, 111.1, 109.0, 55.1,
40.1, 32.7. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 380 (M+, 65), 365 (85), 349 (30), 273 (100), 130 (25). Anal. calcd. for
C26H24N2O: C, 82.07; H, 6.36; N, 7.36. Found C, 81.72; H, 5.96; N, 6.99.
3,3’-Bis-(N-methylindolyl)-(3-chlorophenyl)methane (3e). Pink solid, mp: 195–197 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4).
IR (KBr) νmax: 3051, 2930, 1458, 1420, 1094, 743 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.45 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H,
Ar–H), 7.42 (s, 1H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.36-7.25 (m, 5H, Ar–H), 7.10 (dt, J = 0.7, 7.9 Hz,
2H, Ar–H), 6.61 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 5.94 (s, 1H), 3.73 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 146.8, 137.5,
134.1, 129.5, 128.8, 128.3, 127.3, 127.0, 126.4, 121.6, 119.9, 118.9, 117.5, 109.2, 39.9, 32.7. MS (EI,
70 eV): m/z = 386 (M+, 20), 384 (M+, 60), 371 (5), 369 (15), 273 (100). Anal. calcd. for C25H21N2Cl:
C, 78.01; H, 5.50; N, 7.28. Found C, 77.80; H, 5.50; N, 7.16.
3,3’-Bis-(N-methylindolyl)-(2-bromophenyl)methane (3f). Pink solid, mp: 247–249 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4).
IR (KBr) νmax: 3046, 2926, 1457, 1227, 1023, 792 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.63 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.2 Hz,

Molecules 2011, 16
3863
1H, Ar–H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.28–7.20 (m, 3H, Ar–H),
7.17 (dt, J = 1.2, 7.6 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.09 (dt, J = 1.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.03 (dt, J = 0.9, 7.9 Hz, 2H,
Ar–H), 6.51 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 6.33 (s, 1H), 3.70 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 143.4, 137.5, 132.8,
130.5, 128.5, 127.7, 127.4, 127.2, 124.8, 121.5, 120.0, 118.7, 117.0, 109.1, 39.4, 32.7. MS (EI, 70 eV):
m/z = 430 (M+, 20), 428 (M+, 20), 350 (55), 273 (100), 130 (30). Anal. calcd. for C25H21N2Br: C,
69.94; H, 4.93; N, 6.52. Found C, 69.82; H, 4.55; N, 6.54.
3,3’-Bis-(N-methylindolyl)-(3-nitrophenyl)methane (3g). Yellow solid, mp: 157–159 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4).
IR (KBr) νmax: 3063, 2926, 1525, 1474, 1349, 743 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.27 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H,
Ar–H), 8.12 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.9 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.74 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H,
Ar–H), 7.41 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.28 (dt, J = 0.9, 7.9 Hz, 2H,
Ar–H), 7.18 (dt, J = 0.9, 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.61 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 6.05 (s, 1H), 3.75 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3).
13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 148.5, 146.9, 137.5, 134.9, 129.1, 128.4, 127.1, 123.6, 121.9, 121.4, 119.7,
119.0, 116.8, 109.4, 40.0, 32.8. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 395 (M+, 80), 380 (5), 349 (5), 273 (100), 122
(5). Anal. calcd. for C25H21N3O2: C, 75.93; H, 5.35; N, 10.63. Found C, 75.76; H, 4.98; N, 10.54.
3,3’-Bis-(2-methylindolyl)-(3-methylphenyl)methane (4a). Pink solid, mp: 181–184 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4).
IR (KBr) νmax: 3383, 2915, 1677, 1607, 1459, 740 cm−1. 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 10.71 (s, 2H, N–H),
7.19 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.11 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.03–6.96 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 6.87 (dt,
J = 0.9, 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.66 (dt, J = 0.9, 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 5.87 (s,
1H), 2.19 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.04 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 144.65, 137.20, 135.48,
132.44, 129.81, 128.76, 128.20, 126.88, 126.24, 119.93, 118.92, 118.34, 112.69, 110.73, 39.00, 21.64,
12.38. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 364 (M+, 15), 349 (100), 234 (40), 130 (70). Anal. calcd. for C26H24N2:
C, 85.68; H, 6.64; N, 7.69. Found C, 85.50; H, 6.91; N, 7.45.
3,3’-Bis-(2-methylindolyl)-(3-methoxylphenyl)methane (4b). Pink solid, mp: 147–150 °C (EtOAc/PE = 1:4).
1
IR (KBr) νmax: 3385, 1594, 1459, 1147, 744 cm−1. H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 10.73 (s, 2H, N–H),
7.21 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.16 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 6.88 (dt, J = 0.9, 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H),
6.83 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.79–6.72 (m, 3H, Ar–H), 6.67 (dt, J = 0.9, 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 5.88
13
(s, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.07 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 159.55, 146.39, 135.49,
132.47, 129.31, 128.71, 121.71, 119.97, 118.93, 118.36, 115.48, 112.57, 110.98, 110.75, 55.27, 39.05,
12.36. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 380 (M+, 95), 365 (35), 349 (45), 273 (100), 130 (35). Anal. calcd. for
C26H24N2O: C, 82.07; H, 6.36; N, 7.36. Found C, 81.85; H, 6.02; N, 7.17.
3.3. General Procedure for the Preparation of Bis(thienyl)methanes 5a-5g
To a solution of aryl benzaldehyde (0.5 mmol) and RuCl3·3H2O (0.05 mmol ) in ethylene glycol
dimethyl ether (1 mL) was added 2-methylthiophene (1.0 mmol) under air atmosphere and the mixture
was stirred at 80 °C (monitored by TLC). Then, the reaction mitxure was concentrated under reduced
pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (eluent: EtOAc/PE = 1:8) to yield
the corresponding product.

Molecules 2011, 16
3864
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylthienyl)phenylmethane (5a). Yellow waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 3059, 2919, 1525,
1
1448, 1225, 794 cm−1. H-NMR (MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.33–7.28 (m, 4H), 7.27–7.21 (m, 1H), 6.61–6.55
13
(m, 4H), 5.67 (s, 1H), 2.41 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 145.3, 143.8, 139.1, 128.4, 128.3,
127.0, 125.7, 124.5, 47.8, 15.4. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 284 (M+, 100), 269 (95), 207 (50), 187 (20), 97
(5), 77 (5). HRESIMS calcd. for [C17H16S2 + H]+: 285.4469; found: 285.4466.
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylthienyl)-(3-methylphenyl)methane (5b). Yellow waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 3058,
1
2919, 2859, 1446, 800, 755 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.19 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.13–7.03 (m, 3H),
6.58 (dd, J = 0.5, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 6.54 (dd, J = 1.0, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 5.66 (s, 1H), 2.44 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3), 2.35
(s, 3H, CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 145.4, 143.7, 139.0, 138.0, 129.0, 128.3, 127.8, 125.6, 125.3,
124.5, 47.8, 21.5, 15.4. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 298 (M+, 98), 283 (100), 201 (15), 91 (5), 77 (5).
HRESIMS calcd. for [C18H18S2 + H]+: 299.4735; found: 299.4733.
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylthienyl)-(4-methylphenyl)methane (5c). Yellow waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 3062,
2920, 1533, 1448, 745 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.24 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.16 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 6.63
(d, J = 3.4 Hz, 2H), 6.61 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 2H), 5.68 (s, 1H), 2.45 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3), 2.37 (s, 3H, CH3).
13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 145.5, 140.9, 138.9, 136.5, 129.1, 128.1, 125.5, 124.4, 47.4, 21.0, 15.3. MS
(EI, 70 eV): m/z = 298 (M+, 90), 283 (100), 201 (20), 91 (5), 77 (5). Anal. calcd. for C18H18S2: C,
72.43; H, 6.08. Found C, 72.80; H, 6.43.
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylthienyl)-(3-methoxyphenyl)methane (5d). Yellow waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 2922,
1
1599, 1487, 1448, 1265, 1156, 1046 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.26 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d,
J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (dd, J = 0.6, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (dd, J = 0.5, 3.5 Hz, 2H),
13
6.58 (dd, J = 1.0, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 5.67 (s, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.44 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). C-NMR
(CDCl3): δ 159.6, 145.4, 145.0, 139.1, 129.4, 125.7, 124.5, 120.8, 114.3, 112.1, 55.2, 47.8, 15.4. MS
(EI, 70 eV): m/z = 314 (M+, 100), 299 (15), 283 (10), 207 (90), 122 (15). Anal. calcd. for C18H18S2O:
C, 68.75; H, 5.77. Found C, 68.91; H, 5.84.
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylthienyl)-(3-chlorophenyl)methane (5e). Yellow waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 3063,
1
2919, 1473, 1262, 1095, 1034, 802 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.33 (s, 1H), 7.28–7.21 (m, 3H),
6.64–6.59 (m, 4H), 5.68 (s, 1H), 2.46 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 145.8, 144.3, 139.4,
134.3, 129.7, 128.5, 127.2, 126.6, 125.9, 124.7, 47.4, 15.4. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 320 (M+, 24),
318 (M+, 99), 305 (25), 303 (100), 283 (10), 223 (8), 221 (25), 207 (99), 113 (7), 111 (20). Anal. calcd.
for C17H15S2Cl: C, 64.03; H, 4.74. Found C, 64.06; H, 4.92.
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylthienyl)-(2-bromophenyl)methane (5f). Yellow waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 3063,
2923, 2856, 1442, 1229, 1028, 795 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.55 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (dd,
J = 7.9, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (dt, J = 1.2, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (dt, J = 1.8, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.59–6.54 (m, 4H),
6.13 (s, 1H), 2.42 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 143.8, 143.0, 139.3, 132.9, 130.1, 128.6, 127.6,
126.2, 124.6, 124.4, 46.7, 15.4. . MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 364 (M+, 100), 362 (M+, 100), 349 (60), 347
(60), 283 (25), 207 (60), 97 (25). Anal. calcd. for C17H15S2Br: C, 56.20; H, 4.16. Found C, 56.53; H, 4.47.

Molecules 2011, 16
3865
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylthienyl)-(3-nitrophenyl)methane (5g). Yellow waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 3061,
1
2918, 1529, 1350, 804 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.18 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (dq, J = 0.9, 8.2 Hz,
1H), 7.66 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.63-6.58 (m, 4H), 5.80 (s, 1H), 2.44 (s, 6H,
13
2 × CH3). C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 148.4, 145.9, 143.4, 139.9, 134.4, 129.4, 126.2, 124.8, 123.3, 122.1,
47.3, 15.4. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 329 (M+, 100), 314 (96), 283 (5), 232 (5), 207 (70), 97 (5), 77 (5).
Anal. calcd. for C17H15NO2S2: C, 61.98; H, 4.59; N, 4.25. Found C, 62.37; H, 4.63; N, 4.45.
3.4. General Procedure for the Preparation of Bis(fur-2-yl)methanes 6a-6f
To a cooled (0 °C) solution of aryl benzaldehyde (0.5 mmol) and RuCl3·3H2O (0.05 mmol) in
ethylene glycol dimethyl ether (1 mL) was added 2-methylfuran (6.0 mmol) under air atmosphere and
the mixture was placed into refrigerator to stay without stirring at 5 °C. The mixture was shaken for
several seconds every day to ensure homodispersity (monitored by TLC). The reaction mitxure was
then concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica
gel (eluent: EtOAc/PE = 1:8) to yield the corresponding product.
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylfuryl)-(3-methylphenyl)methane (6a). Waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 2922, 1608, 1449,
1
1137, 1021, 779 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.24 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (s, 2H), 7.09 (s, 1H), 5.93
(d, J = 3.3 Hz, 2H), 5.91 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 2H), 5.35 (s, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.29 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3).
13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 153.0, 151.4, 139.9, 138.0, 129.1, 128.3, 127.8, 125.5, 108.1, 106.1, 45.1, 21.5,
13.6. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 266 (M+, 60), 251 (100), 175 (60). HRESIMS calcd. for [C18H18O2 + H]+:
267.3423; found: 267.3417.
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylfuryl)-(4-methylphenyl)methane (6b). Waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 2922, 1607, 1510,
1448, 1130, 1014, 775 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.20 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 5.92
(d, J = 3.5 Hz, 2H), 5.90 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 2H), 5.35 (s, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.28 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3).
13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 153.1, 151.4, 137.1, 136.5, 129.2, 128.3, 108.1, 106.1, 44.8, 21.1, 13.6. MS (EI,
70 eV): m/z = 266 (M+, 100), 251 (20), 185 (15), 175 (55). HRESIMS calcd. for [C18H18O2 + H]+:
267.3423; found: 267.3422.
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylfuryl)-(3-methoxyphenyl)methane (6c). Waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 2922, 1600,
1
1262, 1151, 771 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.26 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H),
6.84–6.80 (m, 2H), 5.91 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 2H), 5.89 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 2H), 5.33 (s, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H, OCH3),
13
2.27 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 159.7, 152.7, 151.4, 141.6, 129.3, 120.8, 114.3, 112.2,
108.2, 106.1, 55.1, 45.1, 13.6. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 282 (M+, 100), 251 (80), 175 (60). HRESIMS
calcd. for [C18H19O3 + H]+: 283.3417; found: 283.3411.
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylfuryl)-(3-chlorophenyl)methane (6d). Waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 2923, 1624, 1437,
1131 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.26–7.23 (m, 3H), 7.16–7.14 (m, 1H), 5.91 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 2H), 5.89
13
(d, J = 3.2 Hz, 2H), 5.32 (s, 1H), 2.26 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 152.0, 151.7, 142.0,
134.2, 129.7, 128.5, 127.2, 126.6, 108.5, 106.2, 44.7, 13.6. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 288 (M+, 20), 286
(M+, 60), 273 (M+, 5), 271 (M+, 15), 175 (100). HRESIMS calcd. for [C17H16O2Cl + H]+: 287.7607;
found: 287.7601.

Molecules 2011, 16
3866
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylfuryl)-(2-bromophenyl)methane (6e). Waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 2926, 1462, 1131,
1021, 747 cm−1. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.58 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (dt, J = 1.0, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.21
(dd, J = 7.9, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (dt, J = 1.8, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 5.91 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 2H), 5.86 (d, J = 3.0 Hz,
2H), 5.83 (s, 1H), 2.27 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 151.7, 151.6, 139.1, 132.9, 130.1,
128.5, 127.5, 124.5, 108.8, 106.1, 44.4, 13.6. MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 332 (M+, 100), 330 (M+, 100), 317
(20), 315 (20), 175 (65). HRESIMS calcd. for [C17H16O2Br + H]+: 332.2117; found: 332.2109.
5,5’-Bis-(2-methylfuryl)-(3-nitrophenyl)methane (6f). Waxy solid. IR (KBr) νmax: 2922, 1528, 1348,
1
1132, 781 cm−1. H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.13–8.11 (m, 2H), 7.59 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (dt, J = 2.3,
7.9 Hz, 1H), 5.94 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 2H), 5.92 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 2H), 5.44 (s, 1H), 2.25 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3).
13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 152.1, 151.1, 148.4, 142.2, 134.6, 129.3, 123.4, 122.2, 108.8, 106.3, 44.7, 13.6.
MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 297 (M+, 90), 282 (15), 175 (100). HRESIMS calcd. for [C17H16NO4 + H]+:
298.3132; found: 298.3129.
4. Conclusions
In summary, RuCl3·3H2O has been demonstrated to be a mild and effective catalyst for the reactions
of aryl aldehydes with indoles, 2-methylthiophenes, and 2-methylfurans, respectively. The catalyzed reactions
produced the corresponding bis(indolyl)methanes, bis(thienyl)methanes, and bis(fur-2-yl)methanes in
moderate to excellent yields. The procedure offers several advantages, including mild reaction
conditions and simple experimental and isolation procedures, which makes it is a useful and attractive
process for the synthesis of bis(indolyl)methanes, bis(thienyl)methanes and bis(fur-2-yl)methanes.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the NSF of China (Number: 20772099), NSF of Jiangxi Province
(Number: 2009GZH0013), and Jiangxi Province Key Support Program for financial support (Number:
2009BNB06200).
References and Notes
1. Lounasmaa, M.; Tolvanen, A. Simple indole alkaloids and those with a nonrearranged
monoterpenoid unit. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17, 175-191.
2. Hibino, S.; Chozi, T. Simple indole alkaloids and those with a nonrearranged monoterpenoid unit.
Nat. Prod. Rep. 2001, 18, 66-87.
3. Porter, J.K.; Bacon, C.W.; Robins, J.D.; Himmelsbach, D.S.; Higman, H.C. Indole alkaloids from
Balansia epichloë. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1977, 25, 88-93.
4. Osawa, T.; Namiki, M. Structure elucidation of streptindole, a novel genotoxic metabolite isolated
from intestinal bacteria. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4719-4722.
5. Fahy, E.; Potts, B.C.M.; Faulkner, D.J.; Smith, K. 6-Bromotryptamine derivatives from the gulf of
california tunicate didemnum candidum. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54, 564-569.

Molecules 2011, 16
3867
6. Bell, R.; Carmeli, S.; Sar, N.; Vibrindole, A. A metabolite of the marine bacterium, vibrio
parahaemolyticus, isolated from the toxic mucus of the boxfish ostracion cubicus. J. Nat. Prod.
1994, 57, 1587-1590.
7. Garbe, T.R.; Kobayashi, M.; Shimizu, N.; Takesue, N.; Ozawa, M.; Yukawa, H. Indolyl
carboxylic acids by condensation of indoles with α-keto acids. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 596-598.
8. Faulkner, D.J. Marine natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2001, 18, 1-49.
9. Morris, S.A.; Anderson, R.J. Brominated bis(indole) alkaloids from the marine sponge hexadella SP.
Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 715-720.
10. Bifulco, G.; Bruno, I.; Riccio, R.; Lavayre, J.; Bourdy, G. Further brominated bis- and tris-indole
alkaloids from the deep-water new caledonian marine sponge orina sp. J. Nat. Prod. 1995, 58,
1254-1260.
11. Ji, S.-J.; Zhou, M.-F.; Gu, D.-J.; Jiang, Z.-Q.; Loh, T.-P. Efficient FeIII-catalyzed synthesis of
bis(indolyl)methanes in ionic liquids. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 1584-1587.
12. Reddy, A.V.; Ravinder, K.; Reddy, V.L.N.; Goud, T.V.; Ravikanth, V.; Venkateswarlu, Y. Zeolite
catalyzed synthesis of bis(indolyl) methanes. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33, 3687-3694.
13. Mahadevan, A.; Sard, H.; Gonzalez, M.; McKew, J.C. A general method for C3 reductive
alkylation of indoles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4589-4591.
14. Ramesh, C.; Banerjee, J.; Pal, R.; Das, B. Silica supported sodium hydrogen sulfate and amberlyst-
15: Two efficient heterogeneous catalyst for facile synthesis of bis- and tris(1H-indol-3-yl)
methanes from indoles and carbonyl compounds. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 557-559.
15. Nagarajan, R.; Perumal, P.T. Incl3 and In(OTf)3 catalyzed reactions: Synthesis of 3-acetyl indoles,
bis-indolylmethane and indolylquinoline derivatives. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 1229-1232.
16. Giannini, G.; Marzi, M.; Marzo, M.D.; Battistuzzi, G.; Pezzi, R.; Brunetti, T.; Cabri, W.; Vesci, L.;
Pisano, C. Exploring bis-(indolyl)methane moiety as an alternative and innovative CAP group in
the design of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 2840-2843.
17. Giannini, G.; Marzi, M.; Moretti, G.P.; Penco, S.; Tinti, M.O.; Pesci, S.; Lazzaro, F.; Angelis, F.D.
Synthesis of cycloalkanoindoles by an unusual DAST-triggered rearrangement reaction. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 2004, 2411-2420.
18. Chen, D.-P.; Yu, L.-B.; Wang, P.-G. Lewis acid-catalyzed reactions in protic media. Lanthanide-
catalyzed reactions of indoles with aldehydes or ketones. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4467-4470.
19. Silveira, C.; Mendes, S.R.; Líbero, F.M.; Lenardão, E.J.; Perin, G. Glycerin and CeCl3·7H2O:
A new and efficient recyclable medium for the synthesis of bis(indolyl)-methanes. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2009, 50, 6060-6063.
20. Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.; Foglia, G.; Giuliani, A.; Marcantoni, E.; Sambri, L. Solvent-free indoles
addition to carbonyl compounds promoted by CeCl 7 HO-NaI-SiO: An efficient method for the
synthesis of streptindole. Synthesis 2004, 6, 895-900.
21. Ji, S.-J.; Wang, S.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Loh, T.-P. Facile synthesis of bis(indolyl)methanes using
catalytic amount of iodine at room temperature under solvent-free conditions. Tetrahedron 2004,
60, 2051-2055.
22. Bandgar, B.P.; Shaikh, K.A. Molecular iodine-catalyzed efficient and highly rapid synthesis of
bis(indolyl)methanes under mild conditions. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1959-1961.

Molecules 2011, 16
3868
23. Chakrabarty, M.; Ghosh, N.; Basak, R.; Harigaya, Y. Dry reaction of indoles with carbonyl
compounds on montmorillonite K10 clay: A mild, expedient synthesis of diindolylalkanes and
vibrindole A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4075-4078.
24. Li, J.; Zhou, M.; Li, B.-G.; Zhang, G.-L. Synthesis of triindolylmethanes catalyzed by zeolites.
Synth. Commun. 2004, 34, 275-280.
25. Chakrabarty, M.; Sarkar, S. Novel clay-mediated, tandem addition-elimination-(Michael) addition
reactions of indoles with 3-formylindole: An eco-friendly route to symmetrical and unsymmetrical
triindolylmethanes. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1351-1353.
26. Deb, M.L.; Bhuyan, P.J. An efficient and clean synthesis of bis(indolyl)methanes in a protic
solvent at room temperature. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 1441-1443.
27. Nair, V.; Abhilash, K.G.; Vidya, N. Practical synthesis of triaryl- and triheteroarylmethanes by
reaction of aldehydes and activated arenes promoted by gold(III) chloride. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
5857-5859.
28. Swain, C.G.; Lupton, E.C., Jr. Field and resonance components of substituent effects. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 4328-4337.
29. Penieres-Carrillo, G.; Garcia-Estrada, J.G.; Gutierrez-Ramirez J.L.; Alvarez-Tolendano, C.
Infrared-assisted eco-friendly selective synthesis of diindolylmethanes. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 337-339.
30. Yadav, J.S.; Reddy, B.V.S.; Murthy, C.V.S.R.; Kumar, G.M.; Madan, C. Lithium perchlorate
catalyzed reactions of indoles: An expeditious synthesis of bis(indolyl) methanes. Synthesis 2001,
5, 783-787.
Sample Availability: Samples of compounds 2-6 are available from the authors.
© 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).