New Journal of Chemistry
Page 4 of 5
COMMUNICATION
DOI: 10.1039/C4NJ01921K
the pyridinium salt was present in the reaction vessel before the the analysis, since they are normally used in very low
addition of Pd(OAc)2, NPs of 3.5 nm ( = 17%) were formed at concentrations and constant during the reaction.
the beginning of the reaction (Fig. 5c), and after 20 h the The performance of this model reaction can be further
diameter showed a small variation with the formation of even extended to applications involving different organic cosolvents,
σ
smaller NPs of 2.5 nm (
σ
= 32%).
exploring the effect of the reactant solubility, type of base,
reactant concentration and the recovery of the product from the
reaction medium, significant parameters when screening
techniques for catalyst synthesis/testing are performed in large-
scale and in more commercially relevant situations.
Experimental
The kinetics experiments were carried out in a quartz cell with
3.0 mL of final volume. All reactions were followed by UV-vis
single wavelength spectral kinetics at 364 nm at 80 ºC. The
samples for TEM were prepared on a carbon-coated Cu grid
and carried out in JEM-1011 equipment. The average particle
diameter was determined by analyzing at least 200 particles.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to CNPq, CAPES and the Central Laboratory
of Electron Microscopy (LCME) at UFSC.
Notes and references
1
J. de Vries, in Top Organometal Chem, eds. M. Beller and H.-U. Blaser,
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 1.
2
J. Tsuji, Palladium reagents and catalysts: new Perspectives for the 21st
Century, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, 2004.
3
4
I. P. Beletskaya and A. V. Cheprakov, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 3009.
L. Ackermann, in Modern Arylation Methods, Wiley-VCH Verlag
GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2009.
5
6
7
A. de Meijere and F. Diederich, eds., MetalꢀCatalyzed CrossꢀCoupling
Reactions, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Germany, 2008.
C. C. C. J. Seechurn, M. O. Kitching, T. J. Colacot and V. Snieckus,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 5062.
A. Hagemeyer, P. Strasser and J. Volpe, Anthony F. , eds., Highꢀ
Throughput Screening in Heterogeneous Catalysis, WILEY-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co., Weinheim, 2004.
E. G. Derouane, V. Parmon, F. Lemos and F. R. Ribeiro, eds., Principles
and Methods for Accelerated Catalyst Design and Testing, Springer
Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002; p 521.
M. Oestreich, ed., The MizorokiꢀHeck reaction, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd,
Chichester, 2009.
Fig. 5 TEM micrographs at the beginning of the reaction and after 20 h catalyzed
by (a) Pd(OAc)2, (b) Pd-NPs and (c) Pd(OAc)2-PS, in H2O/CH3CN (9/1, v/v) ([1]
= 0.1 mmol L-1; [Et3N] = 0.1 mmol L-1; [Pd] = 5 mol %; 80 °C).
Of the three protocols investigated in this study, protocol A
is the most catalytic and productive. However, since the
utilization of Pd(OAc)2 without any type of extra stabilization
led to the formation of large aggregates and even palladium
black at the end of the reaction, its applicability in large-scale
reactions would be compromised. On the other hand, the
protocol C, with the in situ stabilization of the formed Pd-NPs
by the pyridinium salt, proved to be an simple and efficient
approach to protect Pd(0) against inactivation and still provides
good catalytic and productivity results. Thus, this protocol
should be further explored in future studies.
In summary, despite the different natures of the catalysts
tested in this study, the 5-exo regiospecific cyclization reaction
of (2-iodophenyl)(3-methyl-1H-indol-1-yl)methanone (1) was
found to be a very efficient model reaction. In an easy and
quick manner it allows a complete kinetic analysis of the
reaction, the determination of the catalytic parameters for the
catalyst applied and the obtainment of further information on
the mode of action. It is important to note that no other products
were observed in addition to the cyclic product 2, which means
8
9
10 M. O. Simon and C. J. Li, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 1415.
11 R. Grigg, V. Sridharan, P. Stevenson, S. Sukirthalingam and T.
Worakun, Tetrahedron, 1990, 46, 4003.
12 L. S. Ott, M. L. Cline and R. G. Finke, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2007,
7, 2400.
13 S. Ozkar and R. G. Finke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 5796.
14 Z. Y. Deng and D. E. Irish, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 11169.
15 C. Deraedt and D. Astruc, Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 494.
16 S. Narayan, J. Muldoon, M. G. Finn, V. V. Fokin, H. C. Kolb and K. B.
Sharpless, Angew Chem Int Edit, 2005, 44, 3275.
17 Y.-J. Zuo and J. Qu, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 6832.
18 R. N. Butler, A. G. Coyne, W. J. Cunningham and E. M. Moloney, J.
Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 3276.
19 R. N. Butler and A. G. Coyne, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 6302.
that no potential side reactions have occurred, as
a
LaCBio – Chemistry Department, Universidade Federal de Santa
Catarina, Campus Trindade, Florianópolis ꢀ SC, 88040ꢀ900, Brazil. Eꢀ
mail: josiel.domingos@ufsc.br
homocoupling of the substrate 1. Even if this occurs, the
homocoupling reaction product presents a different UV-vis
spectrum, with no absorption interference for the cyclic product
quantification. Moreover, even screening of ligands that could
have similar UV profiles to the product 2 would not interfere in
† Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Synthetic,
reaction kinetics and characterization procedures, as well additional
data for the catalytic tests. See DOI: 10.1039/c000000x/
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012