Angewandte
Chemie
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201300293
Polymers
Synthesis of Functionalizable and Degradable Polymers by Ring-
Opening Metathesis Polymerization**
Joshua M. Fishman and Laura L. Kiessling*
A valuable approach for creating synthetic polymers is the
ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP).[1,2] Well-
defined metal carbene catalysts have been devised that afford
control over the polymer chain length and architecture.[3–6] In
addition, ruthenium carbene initiators have been developed
with excellent air stability and functional group tolerance.[6,7]
These catalysts enable the synthesis of polymers with a range
of functionality,[8–15] thereby providing access to polymers for
diverse applications.[16–19]
Extant polymers from ROMP, like the majority of
synthetic polymers, are nondegradable. They therefore lead
to the accumulation of waste. A functional and degradable
polymer from ROMP would allow the synthetically useful
traits of ROMP reactions to be combined with the growing
need for new degradable polymer scaffolds. To date, efforts to
prepare degradable materials by using ROMP have afforded
polymers that are either functional or partially hydrolyzable,
but not both (Figure 1). For example, cargo can be attached
through a linker such that it can be released from the polymer
backbone by photolysis or hydrolysis in acid.[16,20–22] Still, the
polymeric backbone persists. Alternatively, partially degrad-
able polymers have been generated. A block copolymer can
be generated from a modifiable monomer and a sacrificial
dioxepine or dithiepine monomer.[8,23,24] In this scenario, one
block is composed of a nonhydrolyzable backbone and the
degradable block contains acid-labile acetals or thioacetals
that can be cleaved by hydrogenation. Polymers of this type
only undergo partial degradation, as one block persists. The
current state-of-the-art therefore demands a compromise
between generating polymers that can be customized and
polymers that can be easily degraded.
Figure 1. Strategies to synthesize functionalizable and degradable
ROMP polymers: A) ligand attachment through a cleavable linker,
B) copolymerization with a sacrificial monomer, and C) homopolymeri-
zation of a functionalizable, heterocyclic oxazinone.
it must contain core functionality that gives rise to a polymer
that can be degraded. Third, a means to append desired
functionality onto the monomer or polymer is needed to
enable polymer diversification. Monomers with all of these
attributes have been elusive. Many strained olefinic hetero-
cycles spontaneously aromatize.[26,27] In addition, attempts to
incorporate handles for diversification can further increase
monomer instability.[28] Thus, traditional monomers used in
ROMP cannot be simply modified to instill polymer degrad-
ability.
We sought a new class of monomers that would give rise to
degradable materials. The generation of substrates with an 8-
oxo-2-azabicylo[3.2.1]oct-6-en-3-one framework through
a novel aza-[4+3] cycloaddition was recently reported
(Scheme 1A).[29] We postulated that this bicyclic oxazinone
would be a substrate for ROMP. Calculations suggest that this
framework has a ring strain of 13.4 kcalmolÀ1, which is
comparable to that of trans-cyclooctene (a monomer that has
favorable kinetics of polymerization in ROMP).[25,30] Reports
of successful ring-opening cross metathesis on architecturally
analogous 8-oxo-bicyclo[3.2.1.]oct-6-en-3-ones provided
additional impetus.[31,32] Significantly, if the bicyclic oxazinone
serves as a monomer in ROMP, the resulting framework
should be both acid and base labile (Scheme 1B). Moreover,
we postulated that we could modify this core monomer at
a site distal to the polymerizable moieties and bridgehead
carbon atoms. Thus, without destabilizing the heterocycle, we
could tailor the properties of the resulting materials.
Applying ROMP to synthesize a modifiable homopoly-
mer with a degradable backbone requires a monomer with
three important attributes. First, it must be a strained cyclic or
bicyclic olefin, so that it undergoes polymerization.[25] Second,
[*] J. M. Fishman, Prof. L. L. Kiessling
Department of Chemistry, Departments of Biochemistry
University of Wisconsin—Madison
1101 University Ave., Madison, WI 53706 (USA)
E-mail: Kiessling@chem.wisc.edu
[**] This research was supported by the NIH (R01 GM049975). The UW-
Madison Chemistry NMR facility is supported by the NSF (CHE-
9208463 and CHE-9629688) and NIH (1s10 RRO 8389-01). The UW-
Madison Soft Materials Laboratory is supported by the NSF UW
Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center (NSEC, DMR-0425880)
and UW Materials Research Science and Engineering Center
(MRSEC, DMR-0520527).
Despite our optimism that bicyclic oxazinones would
serve as monomers, we had concerns that polymerization
would yield highly oxygenated polymer products that would
facilitate backbiting.[34,35] Our initial results confirmed our
suspicions. The reaction of 3a using Grubbsꢀ second gener-
ation catalyst (8)[33] in chloroform afforded polymer 4a
(Table 1, entry 1), but we observed a concomitant increase
Supporting information (including experimental details and 1H and
13C NMR data) for this article is available on the WWW under http://
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1 – 5
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1
These are not the final page numbers!