mer.16 This procedure supplements syntheses of dihydro-
1,2-oxazines from O,N-diallylhydroxamic acids via ring
closing metathesis.17 Tetrahydro-1,2-oxazines are valuable
intermediates, for example, for syntheses of pyrrolidine
alkaloids.18
Table 2. Ir-Catalyzed Allylic Substitutions with the Pronucleo-
phile Nu4 a
en-
sub-
time yield
ee
(%)d
try strate
catalyst
base
(h)
(%)b
b/lc
1
2
3
4
1a
1a
1a
1b
in situ/L2
in situ/L2
C1
TBD
DBU
TBD
24
58
92
59
76
94:6
97:3
96:4
98:2
94
99
98
98
Table 1. Ir-Catalyzed Allylic Substitutions with the Pronucleo-
phile Nu3 a
2
1.5
1
in situ/ent- TBD
sub-
time
(h)
yield
(%)b
ee
L2
entry
strate
L*
b/lc
(%)d
5
1b
1c
1c
1d
1d
1d
1d
1d
1e
ent-C1
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
DBU
TBD
TBD
DMAP
1
75
74
80
80
88
83
86
88
47
99:1
98
98
99
97
98
98
94
98
86
6
in situ/L2
C1
2.5
1
90:10
93:7
1
1a
1a
1c
1c
1d
1d
L2
L3
L2
L3
L2
L3
3
20
2.5
43
2.5
16
83
65
90
56
72
74
98:2
98:2
98:2
98:2
97:3
96:4
99
99
99
98
96
97
7
2
8
in situ/L2
in situ/L2
C1
5
87:13
87:13
88:12
95:5
3
9
4.5
2
4
5e
6e
10
11e
12e
13
in situ/L2
in situ/L2
3
3
96:4
a Reactions were carried out with THF as solvent at rt; the catalyst
was prepared in situ using [Ir(cod)Cl]2, L*, and dry TBD. b Isolated yield
of branched product 2. c Determined by 1H NMR of the crude product.
d Determined by HPLC. e Reaction was carried out at 50 °C.
in situ/ent- DBU
2
71:29
L2
14
15
16
1e
1e
1e
C1
C2
C3f
DBU
DBU
DBU
1
1
63
71
72
78:22
90:10
94:6
91
88
93
20
a All reactions were carried out at 50 °C. b Combined yield of 4 þ 5.
The pronucleophile Nu3 fulfills conditions (a)ꢀ(c) en-
umerated above. Likely, Weinreb type reactions19 cannot
be carried out with hydroxamates derived from Nu3.
Therefore, Nu420 was probed. This was found to be slightly
less reactive than Nu3; therefore, reactions were run at
50 °C rather than at rt (Table 2). Regioselectivity was
slightly lower with Nu4 than with Nu3 for reactions of
substrates 1a, 1c, and 1d (Table 1, entries 1, 3, 5 vs Table 2,
entries 1, 6, 8). Enantioselectivities were excellent for the
substrates 1aꢀd.
c Determined by 1H NMR of the crude product. d Determined by HPLC
or GC. e [Ir(dbcot)Cl]2 was used instead of [Ir(cod)Cl]2. f 2.7 mol % of
the catalyst were used. The yield refers to pure 4e.
As an application of the hydroxamates, the sequence
described in Scheme 3 was carried out. Removal of the Boc
protecting group with TFA followed by acylation with
vinylacetic acid furnished the diene 8 (81%), which was
subjected to ring closing metathesis (RCM) to give the
piperidone 9 in 96% yield. Finally, an approach toward
aza-sugars, a catch and release strategy,22 was employed
by epoxidation and base-catalyzed elimination to give
compound 10. The epoxidation, using a procedure of
Knight,22b,c proceeded with a diastereoselectivity of 95:5.23
Reactions catalyzed with the (π-allyl)Ir complex C1
were particularly fast and proceeded with very high regio-
and enantioselectivity with substrates1aꢀc (entries 3, 5, 7).
For substrates 1d and 1e, typically,21 lower regioselectivity
was obtained; in these cases improvement was possible
with dbcot as an auxiliary ligand (entries 11, 15, 16).
Further improvement was possible by replacement of
TBD as a base, used for in situ activation or as an additive,
by DBU9c (entries 2, 9) or 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine
(DMAP) (entry 12). For substrate 1e the best result was
obtained with C3 as the catalyst (entry 16).
Scheme 3. Short Approach toward Aza-Sugars
(15) For preparation, see: (a) Spiess, S.; Raskatov, J. A.; Gnamm, C.;
€
Brodner, K.; Helmchen, G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 11087–11090. (b)
€
Raskatov, J. A.; Spiess, S.; Gnamm, C.; Brodner, K.; Rominger, F.;
Helmchen, G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6601–6615. (c) Madrahimov,
S. T.; Markovic, D.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 133, 7228–
€
7229. (d) Gartner, M.; Mader, S.; Seehafer, K.; Helmchen, G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 2072–2075.
(16) The assignment of the relative configuration of 7 is tentative.
(17) (a) Le Flohic, A.; Meyer, C.; Cossy, J.; Desmurs, J.-R. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8577–8580. (b) Reddy, V. K.; Miyabe, H.;
Yamauchi, M.; Takemoto, Y. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 1040–1048.
(18) (a) Bates, R. W.; Snell, R. H.; Winbrusch, S. Synlett 2008, 1042–
1044. (b) Bates, R. W.; Song, P. Synthesis 2009, 655–659.
(19) Review: Balasubramaniam, S.; Aidhen, I. S. Synthesis 2008,
3707–3738.
After the promising results presented in Scheme 3, a
shorter route using pronucleophile Nu5 was investigated
(Scheme 4). It was anticipated that the substitution prod-
ucts, e.g., 11, derived from Nu5 could be directly cyclized
(20) Kawase, M.; Kitamura, T.; Kikugawa, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1989,
54, 3394–3403.
€
(21) (a) Gnamm, C.; Franck, G.; Miller, N.; Stork, T.; Brodner, K.;
Helmchen, G. Synthesis 2008, 3331–3350. (b) Lee, J. H.; Shin, S.; Kang,
J.; Lee, S. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7443–7446.
2812
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 11, 2011