68
E. Shi et al. / Dyes and Pigments 122 (2015) 66e73
2.2.4. 4,7-Bis(4-bromophenyl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (5)
about 100 nm, as measured by SEM through a cross section of the
device (Fig. 1b). Finally, a layer of Al was thermally evaporated onto
the film surface at about 5 ꢂ 10ꢁ6 Torr through a shadow mask to
yield the top electrode. The thickness of aluminum (Al) layer was
about 80 nm (Fig. 1b), and an active device area of 0.0314 mm2 was
obtained. All electrical measurements of the device were charac-
terized under ambient conditions, using a HP 4145B semiconductor
parameter analyzer.
A solution of bromine (1.2 mL, 23.3 mmol) in chloroform
(1.5 mL) was added dropwise to a mixture of 4 (288 mg, 1.0 mmol),
iodine (15 mg, 0.06 mmol) and chloroform (4 mL). The resulting
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. After workup,
the solid was filtered off and washed sequentially with aqueous
NaHSO3, water and methanol to afford the crude product. Recrys-
tallization in toluene gave the title compound as yellow needles 5.
Yield: 350 mg (77%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
d (ppm): 7.86 (d,
J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 4H), 7.77 (s, 2H), 7.68 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 4H). HRMS-EI (m/z):
2.4. Measurements
[M þ H]þ calcd for C18H11Br2N2S: 444.9010; found: 444.9016.
The 1H NMR (400 MHz) data were recorded on Varian 400 M
spectrometers using CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 as solvent and TMS as in-
ternal standard at room temperature. High resolution mass spectra
(HRMS) were performed on a Micromass GCT-TOF mass spec-
trometer with an ESI source. UVevis absorption spectra were car-
ried out with a PerkinElmer Lambda-17 spectrophotometer at room
temperature. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were carried
out using a platinumecarbon working electrode, an Ag/AgCl
reference electrode, and a counter electrode (Pt wire) at room
temperature on a Corr-Test CS Electrochemical Workstation, a 0.1 M
solution of tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate in anhy-
drous dichloromethane was used. Atomic force microscopy (AFM)
measurements were performed using a MFP-3DTM (Digital In-
struments/Asylum Research) AFM instrument. Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images were taken on a Hitachi S-4700 scanning
electron microscope. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were taken
on an X'Pert-Pro MPD X-ray diffractometer. The devices were
characterized under ambient conditions, using a HewlettePackard
4145B semiconductor parameter analyzer with a HewlettePackard
8110A pulse generator.
2.2.5. 5,8-Bis(4-bromophenyl)-2,3-dimethylquinoxaline (7)
Compound 5 (335 mg, 0.75 mmol), NaBH4 (2.81 mg, 7.5 mmol),
CoCl2$6H2O (3.6 mg, 0.015 mmol), 150 mL EtOH and 40 mL THF
were charged into a 500 mL flask. The mixture was refluxed for 3 h,
cooled to room temperature and filtered. The solvent was evapo-
rated, water was added and the reaction mixture was extracted
three times with Et2O. The combined organic layer was dried over
Na2SO4. Evaporation of the solvent gave 6 as a pale white solid. A
mixture of
6 (210 mg, 0.5 mmol), 2,3-butanedione (55 mL,
0.55 mmol), 5 mL toluene and 3 mL acetic acid was refluxed for 5 h.
After cooling to room temperature, the resultant mixture was
poured into water and extracted with DCM. After drying over
Na2SO4, the remaining liquid was concentrated and purified by
column chromatography (PE:DCM ¼ 1:1) to produce 180 mg (81%)
of 7 as a while solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
d (ppm): 7.72 (s, 2H),
7.63 (s, 8H), 2.68 (s, 6H).
2.2.6. 40,400-(2,3-Dimethylquinoxaline-5,8-diyl)dibiphenyl-4-
carbonitrile (QU-2)
Compound QU-2 was synthesized similarly as described for the
synthesis of QU-1, yield 79% (121 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
3. Results and discussion
d
(ppm): 7.92 (d, J ¼ 8.2 Hz, 4H), 7.85 (s, 2H), 7.81e7.74 (m, 12H),
2.73 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (376 MHz, CF3COOD)
d
(ppm): 149.5, 141.3,
3.1. Optical properties and electrochemical properties
136.3, 132.4, 130.0, 129.9, 129.6, 128.4, 126.3, 123.5, 123.2, 104.9,
24.8. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M þ H]þ calcd for C36H25N4: 513.2079;
found: 513.2067. M. P. 290e292 ꢀC. Elemental analysis: calcd for
Fig. 2 shows the UVevis absorption spectra of QU-1 and QU-2 in
dilute anhydrous tetrahydrofuran solution and in the film state.
QU-1 shows an absorption around 295 nm, which represents a
C
36H24N4: %C, 84.35; %H, 4.72; %N, 10.93; found: %C, 84.20; %H,
4.91; %N, 10.81.
pep* transition, while the absorption around 360 nm corresponds
to an intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) between the benzene
ring and the acceptor. Similarly, QU-2 has a peak around 295 nm as
well; but in contrast, QU-2 reveals a broader absorption band due
to efficient formation of an ICT state in the long-wave direction. The
absorption spectra of the vacuum-deposited thin films on ITO
substrates are also presented in Fig. 2. Compared with those ab-
sorption bands in the solution, both absorption peaks exhibited a
bathochromic shift (5 nm for QU-1) in the film state, demonstrating
that closer and more ordered accumulation was formed [51], which
would facilitate smooth carrier migration between neighboring
2.3. Fabrication of memory device
The memory devices that consisted of the QU-1 or QU-2 films
sandwiched between an ITO bottom electrode and an Al electrode
were fabricated (Fig. 1a). The indium tin oxide (ITO) glass substrate
was precleaned by ultrasonic bath with deionized water, acetone
and ethanol for 20 min, respectively. Then QU-1 and QU-2 were
deposited onto the ITO bottom electrode under a pressure of
10ꢁ6 Torr. The thickness of the small organic molecule layer was
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the indiumetin oxide/organic film/aluminum device, (b) SEM image of the cross section of a storage cell.