1974
T. Yamaguchi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 56 (2015) 1973–1975
Table 2
Oxidative cleavage of cyclic acetals
1) O2, hν (22 W fluorescent lamp)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1 equiv)
EtOAc, 3 h
n
O
O
Scheme 1. Oxidative synthesis of hydroxyalkyl esters from cyclic acetals.
OH
O
R
R
O
n
2) aq. Na2S2O3
1
2
Entry
1
R
n
2
Yielda (%)
Table 1
Study of reaction conditions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1b
1c
1d
1a
1e
1f
1g
1h
1i
4-MeOC6H4
4-t-BuC6H4
4-MeC6H4
Ph
4-ClC6H4
4-CO2MeC6H4
4-NO2C6H4
2-NO2C6H4
4-BocNHC6H4
4-pyridinyl
2-thienyl
n-C5H11
n-C11H23
PhCH2
4-MeOC6H4
4-t-BuC6H4
4-MeC6H4
Ph
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2b
77
84
60
69
73
67
79b
66c
15d
7c
2c
2d
2a
2e
2f
2g
2h
2i
O
O
1) O2, hν (22 W fluorescent lamp)
catalyst, solvent, 3 h
OH
O
O
2) aq. Na2S2O3
1a
2a
Entry
Catalyst (equiv)
Solvent
Yielda (%)
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Rose Bengal (0.1)
Methylene blue (0.1)
1,4-Benzoquinone (0.1)
2-Cl-AQN (0.1)
Anthraquinone (AQN) (0.1)
2-Me-AQN (0.1)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.05)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.2)
—
EtOAc
EtOAc
EtOAc
EtOAc
EtOAc
EtOAc
EtOAc
Acetone
MeCN
CH2Cl2
H2O
0
0
11
57
66
70
71 (69)
73 (64)
44
26
2
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1j
1k
1l
2j
2k
2l
24c
69
64
45
61
75e
51
65b
49
20f
34
1m
1n
1o
1p
1q
1r
1s
1t
2m
2n
2o
2p
2q
2r
2s
2t
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
4-ClC6H4
4-NO2C6H4
n-C11H23
Benzene
i-PrOH
EtOAc
EtOAc
EtOAc
EtOAc
EtOAc
1u
2u
0
70 (64)
a
b
c
d
e
f
Isolated yields.
5 h.
9 h.
24 h.
With acetone as solvent.
With AQN-2-CO2H (0.2 equiv) for 9 h.
56
0
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1)
6b
8c
a
b
c
1H NMR yields. Numbers in parentheses are isolated yields.
Under Ar.
In the dark.
1,3-dioxanes were poor substrates (entry 21). Note that 2-
methyl-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolane (1v), an -disubstituted substrate,
was intact under these conditions (Scheme 2). This result suggest-
ed that the cleavage of the C–H bond was the initial step of this
oxidation.
test substrate, to hydroxyethyl benzoate (2a) under a molecular
oxygen atmosphere (O2-balloon) and visible light irradiation at
room temperature. Rose Bengal and methylene blue were not
effective, in contrast to anthraquinone (AQN) derivatives, and
AQN-2-CO2H was especially suitable for this reaction (entries 1–
7). As the result of examination of solvents (entries 8–13), acetone
was also a good solvent to afford 2a in almost the same yield.
However, the isolated yield was superior when the reaction was
conducted with EtOAc, therefore we decided to use EtOAc as the
solvent (entry 7 vs 8). By checking the catalytic amount, 0.1 equiv
of AQN-2-CO2H was found to produce 2a in the highest yield
(entries 7, 14, and 15). Anthraquinone, molecular oxygen, and visi-
ble light irradiation are all necessary for this oxidative cleavage
because 2a cannot be satisfactorily obtained without them (entries
16–18).
With the optimum reaction conditions in hand, we next inves-
tigated the scope and limitations of the oxidative cleavage of 1,3-
dioxolanes and 1,3-dioxanes (Table 2).19 The corresponding
hydroxyethyl esters were obtained in good to high yields regard-
less of electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups at the
para position on the aromatic nucleus (entries 1–7). Moreover,
1h, bearing a nitro group at the ortho position, was converted to
the desired product in good yields with prolonged reaction time
(entry 8). Substrate including NHBoc, pyridinyl, or thienyl was con-
verted to the corresponding hydroxyalkyl ester albeit in low yields
(entries 9–11). In addition, aliphatic 1,3-dioxolanes were also con-
verted to hydroxyethyl esters in moderate to good yields (entries
12–14). Although the corresponding hydroxypropyl esters were
obtained in good to moderate yields with an electron-donating
group at the para position on the aromatic nucleus (entries 15–
18), an electron-withdrawing group inhibited the reaction, and
resulted in low yields (entries 19 and 20). Furthermore, aliphatic
a
Scheme 3 shows a plausible path for this reaction, which is pos-
tulated by considering the need for irradiation, a catalytic amount
of anthraquinone-2-carboxylic acid, and molecular oxygen in this
reaction. 1,3-Dioxolane 1 initially reacts with photoexcited anthra-
quinone-2-carboxylic acid (AQN⁄) to generate radical species 5.18
Compound 5 traps molecular oxygen to afford peroxyradical 6,
which is subsequently transformed to hydroperoxide 7 by the
abstraction of a hydrogen atom from 1 or AQHÅ. Hydroxyalkyl ester
2 is formed from 7 with H2O or Na2S2O3 in the quench step.
In this reaction mechanism, there is a possibility of radical chain
process via C–H cleavage of 1 by reacting with radical species 6. To
demonstrate the hypothetical mechanism, we carried out the
experiment with intermittent exposure to visible light (Fig. 1). As
the result, we observed the conversion of substrate upon to irradiate
with fluorescent lamp. In contrast, no transformation was detected
in the dark period. This result indicated that the radical chain pro-
cess did not include and support our estimated mechanism. In addi-
tion, excitation of oxygen by photo-excited AQN is probably
occurred, but it does not affect this reaction; because both rose
Bengal and methylene blue which are known to produce the singlet
oxygen were not effective (Table 1, entries 1 and 2).
O2, hν (22 W fluorescent lamp)
AQN-2-CO2H (0.1 equiv)
O
O
1v was recovered
Me
EtOAc, 3 h
1v
Scheme 2. Oxidative cleavage of 2-methyl-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolane.