584
V.M. Moreira et al. / Steroids 76 (2011) 582–587
and after 5 h the reaction was complete. The work up procedure
afforded a yellowish oil (310 mg; 85%). 1H NMR analysis of the
reaction crude revealed a 34:66 ratio of the two reaction prod-
ucts 4 and 5. The products were separated by FCC using ethyl
acetate/petroleum ether 40–60 ◦C (1:8).
(42 l; 0.6 mmol) in dry DMF (3 ml) was added and the mixture
was heated at 80 ◦C, under N2 atmosphere, for 8 h to afford the
two reaction products 8 and 9 (140 mg, 86%). 1H NMR analysis of
the reaction crude revealed a 70:30 ratio of compounds 8 and 9.
The products were separated by FCC using ethyl acetate/petroleum
ether 40–60 ◦C (1:10).
Compound 4 (16 mg; 5%): Mp (acetone) 249–251 ◦C; IR 1242,
1457, 1605, 1697, 1730 cm−1
;
1H NMR (C6D6, 400 MHz) ı 0.79 (s,
Compound
8
(59 mg; 42%): Mp (ethyl acetate/n-hexane)
3H, 18-CH3), 0.84 (s, 3H, 19-CH3), 1.76 (s, 3H, 3-OAc), 4.85 (m, 1H,
3␣-H), 5.34 (m, 1H, 6-H), 6.51 (d, J = 3.57 Hz, 1H, 2ꢀ-H), 6.78 (brs,
1H, methine-H), 7.48 (m, 1H, aromatic-H); 9.24 (d, J = 3.57 Hz, 1H,
1ꢀ-H); 13C NMR (C6D6, 100 MHz) ı 73.7 (C3), 106.6, 109.8, 116.7,
121.6, 122.0, 122.5, 123.1, 127.0, 130.0, 130.6, 137.2, 140.3, 169.6
(CH3CO), 205.4 (C17). EI-MS m/z (%): 457 (34) M+, 397 (67), 281
(34), 184 (36), 139 (52), 117 (100), 91 (54), 81 (38).
223–225 ◦C; IR 1244, 1618, 1705, 1733 cm−1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3,
400 MHz) ı 0.97 (s, 3H, 18-CH3), 1.06 (s, 3H, 19-CH3), 2.03 (s,
3H, 3-OAc), 4.60 (m, 1H, 3␣-H), 5.40 (m, 1H, 6-H), 6.24 (m, 2H,
aromatic-H), 6.78 (methine-H), 7.55 (m, 2H, aromatic-H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 100 MHz) ı 73.7 (C3), 111.32, 117.5, 121.7 (C6), 123.9, 131.4,
140.0 (C5), 170.4 (CH3CO), 206.2 (C17). EI-MS m/z (%): 407 (24) M+,
401 (47), 396 (33), 340 (47), 248 (37), 175 (43), 162 (40), 76 (100).
Compound 5 (74 mg; 24%): Mp (acetone) 284–286 ◦C; IR 1240,
Compound
9
(45 mg; 32%): Mp (ethyl acetate/n-hexane)
1458, 1630, 1722 cm−1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) ı 0.99 (s, 3H, 18-
220–224 ◦C; IR 1247, 1638, 1729 cm−1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) ı
CH3), 1.08 (s, 3H, 19-CH3), 2.04 (s, 3H, 3-OAc), 4.61 (m, 1H, 3␣-H),
5.43 (m, 1H, 6-H), 6.74 (m, J = 3.44 Hz; 1H, 2ꢀ-H), 7.27 and 7.32 (m,
1H and m, 1H, 4ꢀ- and 5ꢀ-H); 7.60 (m, 3H, 1ꢀ-, 3ꢀ- and 6ꢀ-H), 8.14
(brs, 1H, methine-H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) ı 73.6 (C3), 108.0,
110.2, 117.7, 121.2, 121.6, 122.3, 123.5, 124.9, 127.5, 128.8, 136.9,
140.0, 170.5 (CH3CO), 209.4 (C17). EI-MS m/z (%): 457 (10) M+, 397
(20), 281 (25), 184 (36), 154 (60), 117 (100), 91 (52), 79 (48).
0.95 (s, 3H, 18-CH3), 1.07 (s, 3H, 19-CH3), 2.03 (s, 3H, 3-OAc), 4.60
(m, 1H, 3␣-H), 5.41 (m, 1H, 6-H), 6.33 (m, 2H, aromatic-H), 7.03 (m,
2H, aromatic-H), 7.66 (methine-H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) ı
73.6 (C3), 112.1, 118.9, 121.6 (C6), 121.9, 131.3, 140.1 (C5), 170.4
(CH3CO), 209.5 (C17). EI-MS m/z (%): 407 (32) M+, 318 (18), 296
(29), 287 (100), 205 (24), 180 (13), 115 (28), 60 (15).
2.4. (Z)-16-(3-Methyl-1H-indol-1-yl)methylen-17-oxoandrost-
3. Results and discussion
5-en-3ˇ-yl acetate (6) and
(E)-16-(3-methyl-1H-indol-1-yl)methylen-17-oxoandrost-5-en-
3ˇ-yl acetate
(7)
3.1. Synthesis and structural assignment of the E/Z
16-azolylmethylene-17-oxoandrostanes
The method followed that described for compounds
and 3 using 17-chloro-16-formylandrosta-5,16-dien-3-yl acetate
(300 mg, 0.8 mmol), K2CO3 (220 mg, 1.6 mmol), and 3-
methylindole (157 mg; 1.2 mmol), in dry DMF (6 ml), at 80 ◦C under
N2 atmosphere for 21 h, to afford a yellowish oil (232 mg; 62%). 1
NMR analysis of the reaction crude revealed a 70:30 ratio of the
two reaction products 6 and 7. The products were separated by
FCC using ethyl acetate/petroleum ether 40–60 ◦C (1:7).
2
formylandrosta-5,16-dien-3-yl acetate
1 with 7-azaindole,
indole, 3-methylindole, and pyrrole, in DMF, at 80 ◦C, in
the presence of K2CO3, afforded the corresponding E/Z 16-
azolylmethylene-17-oxoandrostanes 2–9 (Scheme 1). Thus,
integration of the aromatic 2ꢀ-H signals on the 1H NMR spectrum
of the reaction crude revealed a 50:50 ratio of the E/Z isomers
for the reaction with 7-azaindole, which were obtained in 74%
yield and separated by FCC on silica gel. The 1H NMR signal of
the methine-H was found downfield at 8.66 ppm for the E-isomer
3 as expected due to deshielding caused by proximity to the
of the Z-isomer 2 appeared downfield at 8.90 ppm whereas for
compound 3 the same signal was found at 7.68 ppm. Unequivocal
assignment of the isomeric pair was performed by X-ray analysis
(Figs. 2 and 3). Bond lengths and angles from the X-ray analysis
are within the normal range of values. The conformations of
the androstane nuclei of both isomers are rather similar, with
rings A and C close to chair conformations and ring B adopting
a conformation close to half-chair, while the D ring has a C-14
envelope conformation in the Z-isomer and a more slightly dis-
torted conformation, twisted around C13–C14, in the E-isomer, as
1
H
Compound 6 (93 mg; 40%): Mp (ethanol) 212–214 ◦C; IR 1245,
1460, 1603, 1703, 1729 cm−1; 1H NMR (CD3COCD3, 400 MHz) ı 1.00
(s, 3H, 18-CH3), 1.11 (s, 3H, 19-CH3), 1.97 (s, 3H, 3-OAc), 2.31 (s,
3H, aromatic-CH3), 4.53 (m, 1H, 3␣-H), 5.44 (m, 1H, 6-H), 7.21 (m,
1H, 3ꢀ-H), 7.25 (m, 1H, 4ꢀ-H), 7.49 (brs, 1H, methine-H); 7.54 (m, 1H,
2ꢀ-H); 7.70 (m, 1H, 5ꢀ-H); 8.59 (brs, 1H, 1ꢀ-H); 13C NMR (CD3COCD3,
100 MHz) ı 75.1 (C3), 111.9, 116.8, 117.7, 120.7, 123.6, 123.7, 124.9,
128.9, 129.2, 131.1, 139.2, 142.0, 171.3 (CH3CO), 207.6 (C17). EI-MS
m/z (%): 471 (47) M+, 411 (43), 281 (46), 197 (38), 168 (89), 131
(100), 91 (67), 81 (41).
Compound 7 (53 mg; 23%): Mp (ethanol) 227–229 ◦C; IR 1238,
1461, 1624, 1730 cm−1 1H NMR (CD3COCD3, 400 MHz) ı 0.98 (s,
;
3H, 18-CH3), 1.12 (s, 3H, 19-CH3), 1.97 (s, 3H, 3-OAc), 2.33 (s,
3H, aromatic-CH3), 4.53 (m, 1H, 3␣-H), 5.45 (m, 1H, 6-H), 7.24 (m,
J1 = J2 = 7.24 Hz, 3ꢀ-H); 7.34 (m, 1H, 4ꢀ-H); 7.59 (m, 1H, 2ꢀ-H); 7.64
(brs, 1H, 1ꢀ-H); 7.71 (m, 1H, 5ꢀ-H), 8.03 (brs, 1H, methine-H); 13C
NMR (CD3COCD3, 100 MHz) ı 75.1 (C3), 111.8, 111.9, 119.2, 121.0,
123.6, 123.7, 124.6, 125.4, 128.1, 131.6, 139.3, 142.0, 171.3 (CH3CO),
209.6 (C17). EI-MS m/z (%): 471 (30) M+, 411 (50), 281 (48), 197 (38),
168 (87), 131 (100), 91 (66), 81 (36).
˚
shown by the Cremer and Pople parameters [2: A: Q = 0.542(5) A,
◦
◦
˚
ꢂ = 6.2(4) , ϕ = 83(4); B: Q = 0.457(4) A, ꢂ = 51.3(5) , ϕ = 208.5(6) ;
C: Q = 0.566(4) A, ꢂ = 6.2(4)◦, ϕ = 283(3); D: Q2 = 0.414(4) A,
˚
˚
ϕ2 = 209.0(6); 3: A: Q = 0.548(2) A, ꢂ = 4.9(2)◦, ϕ = 88(3); B:
˚
Q = 0.472(2) A, ꢂ = 49.6(2)◦, ϕ = 203.4(3)◦; C: Q = 0.565(2) A,
˚
˚
ꢂ = 6.3(2)◦, ϕ = 265(2); D: Q2 = 0.413(2) A, ϕ2 = 200.7(2)]. The
˚
pseudo-torsion angle C19–C10–C13–C18 is close to 15◦ in both
isomers, showing some torsion of the androstane nucleus.
2.5. (Z)-16-(1H-Pyrrol-1-yl)methylen-17-oxoandrost-5-en-3ˇ-yl
acetate (8) and
(E)-16-(1H-pyrrol-1-yl)methylen-17-oxoandrost-5-en-3ˇ-yl
acetate (9)
The reaction with indole afforded the expected Z/E isomers 4
and 5, in 85% yield. The ratio of the two isomers 4:5 was found to
be 34:66. The same pattern was observed on the 1H NMR spectra for
the methine- and 1ꢀ-H signals which appeared at 6.78 and 9.24 ppm,
respectively, for compound 4, and at 8.14 and 7.60 ppm for com-
pound 5. The Z/E isomers 6 and 7 were obtained in the reaction of 1
The method followed that described for compounds 2 and
3 using 17-chloro-16-formylandrosta-5,16-dien-3-yl acetate 1
(150 mg, 0.4 mmol) and K2CO3 (165.5 mg, 1.2 mmol). Pyrrole