which the chiral pyrrolidine is formed in 26% ee. This level of
enantioselectivity represents a remarkable increase from the
5–10% obtained with calcium BOX complexes8 and is also
higher than the calcium complexes reported by Sadow et al.10
It is thus far unclear as to why the enantioselectivity in this case
far exceeds the other diamine–substrate combinations tested,
however the phenyl-substituted diamine/phenyl-substituted
substrate combination suggests that p–p stacking may be an
important feature in one of the intermediate steps of the catalytic
cycle. Such interactions may well explain the lack of selectivity in
the entries 2 and 4; as well as the lack of selectivity in any entry
involving the methyl-substituted substrate A. It is clear however
that further investigations into the detailed mechanism are
warranted, for such studies will undoubtedly facilitate further
developments in stereoselective catalysis with calcium complexes.
Chiral 1,2-diamines have been shown to be efficient stereo-
directing ligands in the calcium-catalysed intramolecular
hydroamination of amino-olefins. Whilst there is clearly room
for improvement, the enantioselectivities described herein
represent a significant advance in calcium-mediated stereo-
selective catalysis. Further work in this area, particularly to
probe the structure of these complexes, is currently underway.
We thank the EPSRC (EP/H012109) and the Royal Society
for financial support. Assistance by Dr R. L. Jenkins with
NMR spectroscopic measurements is gratefully acknowledged.
Fig. 2 Calculated structure of [Ca(NNPh){N(SiMe3)2}(py)] 2ccalc
.
amine moieties is likely to be preferentially deprotonated in the
NNR ligands, the structure of the [Ca(NNPh){N(SiMe3)2}(py)]
2ccalc was calculated using density functional methods.w The
computed structure is displayed in Fig. 2. The two possible
structures, with the primary and secondary amines deproto-
nated, were calculated, however the structure with the secondary
amine deprotonated, as shown in Fig. 2, was found to be
significantly more stable, by ca. 13 kcal. In addition, the
structure indicates a significant deviation of the amido nitrogen
from the expected trigonal planar geometry; the consequence is
that the phenyl ring is orientated so as to provide a chiral
environment at the calcium centre, which may well explain the
effective stereocontrol in hydroamination catalysis.
Notes and references
Complexes 2a–2d were tested as precatalysts for the enantio-
selective hydroamination of the amino-olefin substrates A and B
(Scheme 3). The activities and enantioselectivities of these cata-
lytic reactionsz are summarised in Table 1. For each of the
ligands 2a–2c the reaction proceeded significantly slower than
with the homoleptic bis amide complex Ca{N(SiMe3)2}-
(THF)2 (23 h for A and 20 min for B at ambient temperature),
as is expected when adding a sterically demanding spectator
ligand. Interestingly, when the para-fluorophenyl ligand 2d was
employed, no activity was observed at all over a two week period
(entries 7 and 8). The same was true of ligand 2c, although only
with the dimethyl-substrate A (entry 5). Most noteworthy is
catalyst 2c (phenyl N-substituent) with substrate B (entry 6), in
z 70 mmol [Ca(NNR){(N(SiMe3)2}(THF)], 0.7 mmol substrate, 0.5 ml
C6D6, rt. Reaction progress monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
Enantiomeric excesses determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy after the
addition of R-(ꢀ)-O-acetylmandelic acid. See ref. 13.
1 Recent reviews: (a) M. Westerhausen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 2009,
635, 13; (b) S. Harder, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 3852;
(c) M. Westerhausen, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2008, 252, 1516;
(d) J. D. Smith, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 6597.
2 D. Seyferth, Organometallics, 2009, 28, 1598.
3 M. H. Chisholm, J. Gallucci and K. Phomphrai, Inorg. Chem.,
2004, 43, 6717.
4 (a) M. R. Crimmin, I. J. Casely and M. S. Hill, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 2042; (b) S. Datta, H. W. Roesky and S. Blechert,
Organometallics, 2007, 26, 4392; (c) A. G. M. Barrett,
M. R. Crimmin, M. S. Hill, P. B. Hitchcock, G. Kociok-Kohn
¨
and P. A. Procopiou, Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47, 7366; (d) J. R. Lachs,
A. G. M. Barrett, M. R. Crimmin, G. Kociok-Kohn, M. S. Hill,
¨
M. F. Mahon and P. A. Procopiou, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2008, 4173;
(e) A. G. M. Barrett, C. Brinkmann, M. R. Crimmin, M. S. Hill,
P. A. Hunt and P. A. Procopiou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,
131, 12906; (f) M. Arrowsmith, M. S. Hill and G. Kociok-Kohn,
¨
Organometallics, 2009, 28, 1730; (g) P. Horrillo-Martinez and
K. C. Hultzsch, Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50, 2054.
Scheme 3 Hydroamination catalysis (R0 = Me A or Ph B).
5 J. Spielmann and S. Harder, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2008, 1480.
6 J. Spielmann, F. Buch and S. Harder, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2008, 47, 9434.
7 M. G. Cushion and P. Mountford, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 2276.
8 Group 2 metals have been used in asymmetric Lewis acid catalysis:
S. Kobayashi and Y. Yamashita, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 58.
9 F. Buch and S. Harder, Z. Naturforsch., B, 2008, 63, 169.
10 S. R. Neal, A. Ellern and A. D. Sadow, J. Organomet. Chem., 2011,
696, 228.
11 S. W. Coghlan, R. L. Giles, J. A. K. Howard, L. G. F. Patrick,
M. R. Probert, G. E. Smith and A. Whiting, J. Organomet. Chem.,
2005, 690, 4784.
12 D. C. Bradley, M. B. Hursthouse, A. A. Ibrahim, K. M. A. Malik,
M. Motevalli, R. Moseler, H. Powell, J. D. Runnacles and
¨
Table
1
Catalytic hydroamination of amino-olefins using
[Ca(N2NR){N(SiMe3)2}(THF)]z
Entry
Ligand
Substrate
Timea
Conv.a %
eeb
%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1a
1a
1b
1b
1c
1c
1d
1d
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
7 d
24 h
5 d
1 h
21 d
3 d
90
499
499
499
0
80
0
0
0
6
12
5
—
26
—
—
14 d
14 d
a
Determined from 1H NMR spectra when no further conversion
A. C. Sullivan, Polyhedron, 1990, 9, 2959.
13 G. Zi, F. Zhang, L. Xiang, Y. Chen, W. Fang and H. Song, Dalton
Trans., 2010, 39, 4048.
observed. Determined by 1HNMRusingR-(ꢀ)-O-acetylmandelicacid.13
b
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 5449–5451 5451