only been reported for transformations involving the ring
closure of non-conjugated dienic systems in which the
cyclization was initiated by an activated function (epoxide,
keto ester, or other reactive functional groups).11
Whereas catalytic cycloisomerization processes invol-
ving enynes or diynes with organometallic complexes
(mainly Pd, Au, Ru) have been extensively reported in
recent years,12 the catalytic cycloisomerization of non-
conjugated olefins is rare because of the lower reactivity
of the double bonds, in particular in highly substituted and
bulky olefinic systems.
could be isolated from the reaction of 1a under milder
conditions (see the Supporting Information).
A screening of several metallic triflates and triflimidates,
including SnIV, ScIII, AlIII, FeIII, or CuII derivatives,
revealed that commercially available Bi(OTf)3, a hydrated
salt,20 afforded the best activity and selectivity in terms of
yield and catalytic activity for the tandem cyclization/
rearrangement of 1a affording 1b in up to 78% yield.
Scheme 1. Double Cylization of (E)-1a Catalyzed by Bi(OTf)3
We have been interested in the preparation of Lewis
superacids such as metallic triflates and triflimidates13 and
their use as catalysts for the functionalization of non-
activated olefins,14 R-amidoalkylation of carbon-centered
nucleophiles,15 FriedelÀCrafts-type allylations,16 as well
as 1,6-diene cycloisomerisations.17
During our previous studies on 1,6-diene cycloisomeri-
zations, Sn(NTf2)4, used at 2À5 mol %, was identified as
an efficient catalyst, both in terms of yield and substrate
scope, over a series of metallic triflates and triflimidates.17
In the present contribution, we have extended our studies
to cationic cyclization of non-conjugated trienes such as
diethyl 2-geranyl-2-prenylmalonate 1a, chosen as a model
substrate (Scheme 1). Sn(NTf2)4, used at 5 mol %, resulted
in a moderate 42% yield of the bicyclic product 1b.
Interestingly, a double cyclization occurred, presumably
via intermediates AÀD with the additional 1,2-methyl shift
from the bridgehead carbon of intermediate B toward the
vicinal position as in C. This rearrangement is similar to
whatisobservedinterpenoidchemistry, inparticularin the
1,2-methyl shift of eudesmyl carbocation18 and in the
It is unusual to observe BiIII compounds exhibiting a
π-Lewis character,21 while they are commonly used as
σ-Lewis acids.22 The efficient results obtained with Bi(OTf)3
for the cyclization of 1a, and its apparent superiority over
Sn(NTf2)4, prompted us to evaluate its catalytic activity in
polyene cycloisomerizations. Particular attention was paid
to the structural requirements in the substrate choice, the
influence of a gem-diester moiety, or the possibility of
involving an aryl group in the cyclization. Bi(OTf)3 dis-
played good efficiency for this cyclization and functiona-
lized polycycles were obtained in good yields (Table 1); its
additional interest with respect to Sn(NTf2)4 being the use
of a less toxic Lewis acid.23 In the series of polyunsaturated
compounds examined, a remarkable efficiency in the
synthesis of bicyclic (entries 1À5), tricyclic (entries 6À8),
and tetracyclic stuctures (entry 9) was attained.
overstoichiometric BF3 OEt2-mediated rearrangement in
the labdaneseries.19 Elimination compounds fromA and B
3
(10) During revision of this manuscript, an example of electrophilic
platinum-catalyzed polyene cyclization appeared: Sokol, J. G.; Korapala,
ꢀ
C. S.; White, P. S.; Becker, J. J.; Gagne, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011,
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201100463.
(11) (a) Mullen, C. A.; Campbell, A. N.; Gagne, M. R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6011–6014. (b) Mullen, C. A.; Gagne, M. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11880–11881. (c) Zhao, Y.-J.; Tan, L.-J. S.; Li, B.;
Li, S.-M.; Loh, T.-P. Chem. Commun. 2009, 3738–3740. (d) Carpenter,
N. E.; Kucera, D. J.; Overman, L. E. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 5846–8. (e)
Abelman, M. M.; Overman, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2328–9.
ꢀ
(f) Domingo, V.; Dieguez, H. R.; Morales, C. P.; Arteaga, J. F.; Quilez
del Moral, J. F.; Barrero, A. F. Synthesis 2010, 67–72. (g) Zhao, Y.-J.; Li,
B.; Tan, L.-J. S.; Shen, Z.-L.; Loh, T.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
10242–10244.
(12) (a) Toullec, P. Y.; Blarre, T.; Michelet, V. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
2888–2891. (b) Sethofer, S. G.; Mayer, T.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 8276–8277.
Changing the prenyl side chain of 1a into a crotyl side
chain such as in 2a, still associated with the geranyl moiety,
resulted similarly in a double cyclization/methyl migration
and led to 2b (entry 2). The methyl rearrangement as
observed in the cycloisomerization of 1a also occurred
with analogous structures 3a and 4a. The replacement of a
~
(13) (a) Favier, I.; Dunach, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2031–2032.
~
(b) Antoniotti, S.; Dunach, E. Chem. Commun. 2008, 993–995. (c)
~
Antoniotti, S.; Dalla, V.; Dunach, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
7860–7888.
~
(14) Antoniotti, S.; Poulain-Martini, S.; Dunach, E. Synlett 2010,
2973–2988.
(15) Ben Othman, R.; Affani, R.; Tranchant, M.-J.; Antoniotti, S.;
~
Dalla, V.; Dunach, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 776–780.
(16) Vece, V.; Ricci, J.; Poulain-Martini, S.; Nava, P.; Carissan, Y.;
(20) Gaspard-Iloughmane, H.; Le Roux, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004,
2517–2532.
Humbel, S.; Dunach, E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6239–6248.
~
(17) Grau, F.; Heumann, A.; Dunach, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 7285–7289.
(21) (a) Komeyama, K.; Takahashi, K.; Takaki, K. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 5119–5122. (b) Kimihiro, K.; Natsuko, S.; Motoyoshi, M.; Ken, T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9875–9878.
(18) Christianson, D. W. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3412–3442.
(19) George, J. H.; McArdle, M.; Baldwin, J. E.; Adlington, R. M.
Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 6321–6330.
(22) Leonard, N. M.; Wieland, L. C.; Mohan, R. S. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 8373–8397.
(23) Le Roux, C.; Dubac, J. Synlett 2002, 181–200.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 13, 2011
3321