1986 Deepthi et al.
Asian J. Chem.
porous structure of the polymer, which is the reason that it is
referred to as porogen. The type of porogen used during
the polymerization has a strong influence on the morphology
of the imprinted polymer and its catalytic activity. In the
present study in order to provide comparison between effect
of a thermodynamically stable and an unstable solvent on the
morphology of the polymer matrix and its catalytic activity
the polymerization was carried out using chloroform and
DMSO as the porogen.
and strirred under nitrogen atmosphere for 1 h at room tempe-
rature. Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (2.75 cm3, 14.95 mmol)
and 50 mg initiator AIBN were added and polymerized at 60
ºC for 24 h. The process for the preparation of non-imprinted
polymers was the same as that of the molecular imprinted
polymers except that the imprinted transition state analogue
molecules were not added during polymerization. The polymer
(P-1) formed was collected by filtration, washed with acetone,
Soxhlet extracted with chloroform for complete removal of
transition state analogue and dried in vaccum. The same
procedure was followed by using DMSO as porogen instead
of chloroform resulted in polymer (P-2).
EXPERIMENTAL
Solid state 13C NMR spectra were recorded on AMX-400
NMR spectrometer. 1H NMR spectra were taken using Bruker
Avance DPX-300MHz FT-NMR spectrometer in CDCl3.
31P-NMR spectra was taken on AC200 NMR spectrometer.
Infrared spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu FTIR-8400S
spectrophotometer. Kinetic determinations were performed
using a Shimadzu UV-visible 2450 spectrophotometer
equipped with a thermostated cell. SEM analyses were
performed on JEOL JSM 6390 SEM analyzer.
Catalytic activity measurement of imprinted and non-
imprinted polymers: Z-L-phenylalanine p-nitrophenyl ester
was chosen as the substrate to evaluate the hydrolytic activity
of the imprinted and non-imprinted polymers P-1 and P-2 in a
9:1 (v/v) solution of tris-HCl buffer and acetonitrile at 25 ºC.
A 10 mg each molecular imprinted polymer and non-imprinted
polymers of polymers P-1 and P-2 was placed in a sealed test
tube, to which a 2 mL acetonitrile-tris HCl buffer (pH = 7.25)
added and allowed to equilibrate for 30 min. Acetonitrile
solution (0.2 mL) containing 3.42 × 10-3 mmol Z-L-phenyl-
alanine p-nitrophenyl ester as a substrate [functional host
molecule/substrate = 1:0.36 (molar ratio)]. The hydrolysis
activity of the polymers was determined by measuring the
hydrolytic product (p-nitrophenol) produced in the reaction
mixture. The produced p-nitrophenol was detected at 400 nm
with UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The degree of self-hydrolysis
of the substrate was also measured without the functional host
molecule under the same conditions. The rate of hydrolysis
was determined by measuring the concentration of p-
nitrophenol released at definite time intervals. Rates were
determined by calculating the slope of ln(Aα-At) (where Aα is
the measured absorbance at infinity and At is the absorbance
at time t) vs. time, after correcting for background hydrolysis
without polymer and dividing by the molar concentration of
imidazole present.
Synthesis of monomer: The monomer N-methacryloyl
L-histidine was prepared from methacryloyl chloride, L-histidine
monohydrochloride and NaOH following the reported proce-
dure20. FTIR (cm-1): 1612 (HC=CH), 1651 (amide carbonyl),
1
1
1705 (acid carbonyl). H NMR (CDCl3) δ ppm: 7.6 (s, H,
imidazole NH), 7.37 (s, 1H, imidazole CH), 6.76 (s, 1H,
imidazole CH), 3.03, 2.56 (s, CH2), 4.29 (d, 1H, C=CH), 1.83
(s, 3H, CH3).
Synthesis of transition state analogue (phenyl 1-
benzyloxycarbonyl amino-4-methoxybenzyl phosphonate):
Triphenyl phosphite (13.2 mmol), p-methoxy benzaldehyde
(19.8 mmol), benzyl carbamate (13.2 mmol) and glacial
acetic acid (2 mL) were stirred for 4 h at 100 ºC in an oil bath.
The diphenyl phosphonate formed was hydrolyzed with NaOH
(0.4 N) at room temperature for 2 days (Fig. 1). It was acidified
with conc. HCl and the product formed was purified by column
chromatography using 9:1 chloroform-methanol mixture.
FTIR (KBr, νmax, cm-1): 1300 (P=O stretching), 945 (P-OH
stretching), 1250 (P-O-benzyl stretching). 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ ppm: 1.73 (s, H, OH), 3.77 (s, 3H, OCH3), 5.49 (d, 2H,
CH2), 6.73-7.42 (m, 13H, aromatic CH). 31P NMR δ ppm: 24.99
P(O)(OPhe)(OH),16.50 (P-O-P angle).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Spectral analysis of transition state analogue imprinted
and non-imprinted polymers: FTIR spectroscopy and solid
state 13C NMR spectroscopy were used to characterize the
polymer structure. From the FTIR spectrum of molecular
imprinted polymer and non-imprinted polymers, the peak at
1712 cm-1 represents the C=O double-bond stretching vibration
in the carboxylic acid groups of poly N-methacryloyl L-histi-
dine. The peak at 1549 cm-1 indicates the N-H deformation
vibration in the amide groups and a peak at 3417 cm-1 corres-
ponds to NH streching frequency of amide. The small peaks
at 1387 and 1367 cm-1 indicated the stretching vibration of
methyl group protons.
The 13C NMR spectrum (Fig. 2) give the information about
the chemical structure of polymer backbone. The peak at 178.7
ppm is due to the ester carbonyl carbon of EGDMA. The small
peak at 113.1 ppm corresponds to the -CH carbon of imidazole
ring. The peaks at 63.9 ppm and 26.9 ppm are due to the -CH2
carbon atom of ethylene-glycol dimethacrylate copolymer and
peak at 20.3 ppm was appeared by the -CH3 group.
O
O
OH
O
CH3COOH/1000C
+
P(OC6H5)3
+
P
N
O
O
N
H
NaOH
2
O
O
OMe
OMe
Fig. 1. Synthesis of transition state analogue
Preparation of N-protected phenylalanine esters: N-
protected phenylalanine esters were prepared with coupling
between the corresponding protected amino acids and
p-nitrophenol in presence of DCC27.
Synthesis of transition state analogue imprinted and
non-imprinted polymers: The transition state analogue (0.319
g, 0.748 mmol) and monomer N-methacryloyl L-histidine
(0.329 g, 1.495 mmol) were dissolved in chloroform (30 mL)