Mendeleev Commun., 2011, 21, 165–167
According to quantum chemical computations, complex 3 is
an almost planar molecule with nearly Cs symmetry (Figure 3).
The deviation from the plane of the naphthalocyanine macro-
cycles does not exceed 0.1 Å for any of the atoms. Magnesium
ions are coordinated in two cavities of the naphthalocyanine ligand
(ion deviation from the naphthalocyanine ligand plane does not
exceed 0.1 Å). Computation data confirm the conclusions made
by comparing proton shielding that the signals are shifted down-
field in the sequence HPh (~7.5 ppm) < 1-HNPh (~9.1 ppm) <
< 2-HNPh (~10.5 ppm) < 3-HAr (12.1 ppm). The observed and
calculated chemical shifts differ because the solvation effect and
bonding of THF molecules with magnesium ions are not taken
into account.18
2.488 Å
4.031 Å
4.049 Å
12.1
10.5 9.1
10.5
9.1
10.8
9.3
In conclusion, 2,3-dicyano-6,7-diphenylnaphthalene has been
synthesized in high yield. Starting from this compound, dodeca-
phenyl-substituted planar binuclear naphthalocyanine magnesium
complex has been prepared. A considerable bathochromic shift
of absorption up to 1100 nm has been detected for the first time
for this type of complexes.
Figure 3 Structure of complex 3 according to DFT calculations.
thesized, namely, an increase in the intensity of the Soret band
with respect to the Q-band (Figure 2) and broadening of the
Q-band (Figures 1 and 2).
These interactions have the most significant effect in the case
of a binuclear naphthalocyanine complex, which is due to an
expansion of the p-electron conjugation system. Absorption in
the near IR region is not observed in a non-coordinating solvent
(Figure 1). The use of a coordinating solvent (THF) results in
partial or complete disaggregation owing to coordination to the
central metal ion, as we reported previously.6
The authors are grateful to the Joint Supercomputer Center
(JSC) for computing time on MVS-50K.
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2011.04.019.
The naphthalocyanine complexes 3 and 4 were characterised
by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. To assist the ionization
of the complexes, trans-2-[3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-2-
propenylidene]malononitrile (DCTB) was used as the matrix. In
this case the mass spectrum of complex 3¶ contained a molecular
ion peak along with a peak corresponding to the interaction of
References
1 Y. Shen, F. Zheng, W. Cheng, F. Gu, J. Zhang andY. Xia, Semicond. Sci.
Technol., 2010, 25, 065016.
2 Y. Feng, X. Zhang and W. Feng, Org. Electron., 2010, 11, 1016.
3 T. Ikeue, M. Sonoda, S. Kurahashi, H. Tachibana, D. Teraoka, T. Sugimori,
K. Kasuga and M. Handa, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2010, 13, 1170.
4 A. Yu. Tolbin, V. E. Pushkarev, L. G. Tomilova and N. S. Zefirov, Izv.
Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2006, 1112 (Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., 2006,
55, 1155).
matrix fragments with ions of the compound during the ionization
+
·
(M + Ph), as well as a peak corresponding to molecular ion
+
·
fragmentation with abstraction of a phenyl group (M – Ph).
1
5 S. Makarov, C. Litwinski, E. A. Ermilov, O. Suvorova, B. Roder and
D. Wohrle, Chem. Eur. J., 2006, 12, 1468.
For recording H NMR spectra, polar coordinating solvents
(THF and pyridine) were necessary due to the tendency of naph-
thalocyanine complexes, especially binuclear phthalocyanine
ones, toward the aggregation phenomenon in concentrated solu-
tions. DOSY spectroscopy17 was used to confirm that the signals
6 T. V. Dubinina, A. V. Ivanov, N. E. Borisova, S. A. Trashin, S. I. Gurskiy,
L. G. Tomilova and N. S. Zefirov, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2010, 363, 1869.
7 N. Kobayashi, H. Lam, W. A. Nevin, P. Janda, C. C. Leznoff, T. Koyama,
A. Monden and H. Shirai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 879.
8 T. E. Youssef and M. Hanack, J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines, 2002,
6, 571.
9 N. Kobayashi and H. Ogata, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2004, 906.
10 T. V. Dubinina, Abstracts of International Conference ‘Lomonosov-2010’,
Moscow, 2010, ISBN 978-5-317-03197-8, 59_947_2963.
11 S. G. Makarov, O. N. Suvorova, G. Schnurpfeil and D. Wöhrle, Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem., 2010, 4617.
1
observed belong to the same molecule. The H NMR spectrum
of binuclear complex 3¶ is characterised by a weak downfield
shift of the signals corresponding to the aromatic protons of the
peripheral p-system (1-HNph and 2-HNph) with respect to the cor-
responding signals of the starting nitrile 1, which may be due to
the effect of the naphthalocyanine macrocycle. Assignment of
proton signals was based on the effect of the shielding cone of the
naphthalocyanine macrocycle on the proton chemical shifts. We
failed to assign the signals in the spectrum of complex 3 based
on NOE observations because of the low compound concentra-
tion, which could not be increased due to aggregation. In view of
this, a quantum-chemical simulation of the complex structure
was performed, followed by computation of the proton chemical
shifts for the resulting structure.††
12 C. G. Dong and Q. S. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 10006.
13 G. C. Eastmond, J. Paprotny, A. Steiner and L. Swanson, New J. Chem.,
2001, 25, 379.
14 J. I. Vlugt, J. M. Bonet,A. M. Mills,A. L. Spek and D. Vogt, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2003, 44, 4389.
15 B. Schäfer, H. Görls, S. Meyer, W. Henry, J. G. Vos and S. Rau, Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem., 2007, 4056.
16 J. Yang and M. R. Van De Mark, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 5223.
17 D. Wu, A. Chen and C. S. Johnson Jr., J. Magn. Reson. A, 1995, 115, 123.
18 P. M. Kozlowski, K. Wolinski, P. Pulay, B.-H. Ye and X.-Y. Li, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 1999, 103, 420.
19 J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865.
20 D. N. Laikov, Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow State University, Moscow, 2000.
21 W. J. Stevens, H. Basch and M. Krauss, J. Chem. Phys., 1984, 81, 6026.
22 W. J. Stevens, M. Krauss, H. Basch and P. G. Jasien, Can. J. Chem.,
1992, 612.
¶
For MALDI-TOF (Figure 1S) and 1H NMR (Figure 2S) spectra of com-
plex 3, see Online Supplementary Materials.
†† DFT calculations details. All calculations were performed using the
resources of an MVS-50K supercomputer of the Joint Supercomputer
mizations were carried out using the PBE generalized gradient functional.19
Geometries were optimized using the TZ2P20 valence basis set and SBKJC
effective core potentials for Mg, C, and N atoms.21–23 Chemical shifts
were calculated using the cc-pCVTZ basis set.24 The shielding of TMS
protons was calculated to be 31.3915 ppm for H. Vibration frequencies
were used to characterize stationary point as minima. All calculations
were performed using the PRIRODA program.25,26
23 T. R. Cundari and W. J. Stevens, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 5555.
24 D. N. Laikov, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2005, 416, 116.
25 D. N. Laikov, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1997, 281, 151.
26 D. N. Laikov and Yu. A. Ustynyuk, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2005,
804 (Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., 2005, 54, 820).
Received: 9th November 2010; Com. 10/3626
– 167 –