ChemComm
Cite this: Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6560–6562
COMMUNICATION
M3L2 metallo-cryptophanes: [2]catenane and simple cageswz
James J. Henkelis,a Tanya K. Ronson,a Lindsay P. Hardingb and Michaele J. Hardie*a
Received 11th February 2011, Accepted 29th March 2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1cc10806a
Crystalline M3L2 complexes with either single cage or triply
interlocking [2]catenane chiral structures are formed the self-
assembly of host-like ligands with transition metals.
groups with the N-donor in a 3-position. One such complex
affords the second example of a triply interlocked [2]-catenane
based on metallo-cryptophanes. Different types of larger
CTV-based metallo-cages have also been reported.11
Tris(3-pyridylmethyl)cyclotriguaiacylene
1
and tris-
Cryptophanes are molecular 3D cage-like hosts where two
cyclotriveratrylene (CTV) fragments are linked together
via organic functional groups.1 Metallo-cryptophanes are
analogous species where the CTV moieties are linked via
metal–ligand coordination, and there have been few reported
[4-(5-pyrimidyl)benzoyl]cyclotriguaiacylene 2 were synthesised
as racemic mixtures in 44% and 81% yields respectively from
the CTV-analogue cyclotriguaiacylene (CTG), Scheme 1.z
Reaction of 1 with Ag(ClO4) in dimethylformamide (DMF)
gave a triply interlocked [2]catenane metallocryptophane
{[Ag3(1)2]}2.(ClO4)6.(solvent)n, as revealed by X-ray crystallo-
graphy.y Crystals with similar unit cell parameters were
obtained by use of Ag(BF4) or Ag(SbF6) in place of Ag(ClO4).
Reaction of 2 with [Ag(CH3CN)4]BF4 in DMSO or with
Cu(NO3)2 in DMF yields single-cage [M3(2)]2]n+ metallo-
cryptophanes in the solid state.
6+
examples.2–4 Our recently reported complex [M3(L)2(NO3)3]2
where M = Zn(II) or Co(II) and L = tris(40-methyl-2-20-
bipyridine-4-methyl)cyclotriguaiacylene is a highly unusual
metallo-cryptophane where two cages form a triply inter-
locked [2]catenane.4
In catenanes and other interlocked molecular species the
threading of one component through another, or coming
together of precursors in specific arrangements, are critical
steps in their formation. Templation and structure directing
supramolecular interactions such as p–p stacking or hydrogen
bonding are important strategies to induce molecular threading
or close association of components.5 Most catenanes are
essentially 2D. A handful of examples of [2]catenane structures
involving interlocked 3D cages have been reported,4,6–9 and a
3D coordination polymer comprised of catenated adamantane
cages has recently been reported by Lu.10 Beer, for example,
reports an anion templated assembly of a triply interlocked
organic cage;6 while examples of triply and quadruply inter-
locked metallo-cages where aromatic p–p stacking interactions
are observed between individual cage species have been
reported by Fujita,7 and Kuroda respectively.8 Cooper and
coworkers have recently reported a triply interlocked organic
cage where there is no template nor obvious structure-directing
supramolecular interactions between the components.9
We report herein M3L2 metallo-crytophanes involving
CTV-type ligands with monodentate pyridyl or pyrimidine
The crystal structure of the complex {[Ag3(1)2]}2.(ClO4)6ꢀ
(DMF)3 has an asymmetric unit comprising two inter-
locked [Ag3(1)2]3+ units, six perchlorate anions disordered
across seven molecular positions, and three DMF molecules.
Ag(I) cations have approximately linear coordination and
are coordinated by pyridyl groups from two different 1
ligands. Ag–N distances range from 2.107(6) to 2.311(10) A,
and N–Ag–N angles from 165.1(4) to 176.9(4)1. One Ag
also shows a long contact to a DMF at Ag–O separation
2.580(13) A.
One [Ag3(1)2]3+ metallo-cryptophane cage of the [2]catenane
is shown in Fig. 1a. The cage is composed of two 1 ligands,
both of the same enantiomer. Hence this metallo-cryptophane
is analogous to the chiral anti isomer cryptophanes.1 This is in
6+
contrast with the previously reported [Zn3(L)2(NO3)3]2
[2]catenane structure where a syn-type isomer containing both
enantiomers of the ligand was formed. The second [Ag3(1)2]3+
cage, while crystallographically distinct, is structurally very
similar to the first. It is oriented such that the host ligands of
the two cages form a bowl-in-bowl arrangement, and the two
form a triply interlocked [2]catenane, Fig. 1b. The [2]catenane
is chiral as all 1 ligands are the same enantiomer, although
each crystal is a racemate.
a School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
E-mail: m.j.hardie@leeds.ac.uk; Fax: +44 113 343 6565;
Tel: +44 113 343 6458
b Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences,
University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
There are no significant intermolecular interactions between
the two cages of the [2]catenane. Despite the bowl-in-bowl
arrangement of the ligands, there are no p–p stacking inter-
actions between them, as indicated by the long aromatic ring
centroid separations ranging from 4.64 to 4.98 A. Further-
more, there are no Ag...Ag interactions (all separations 4 5.2 A).
While the Ag centres of one cage are positioned above the
w This article is part of a ChemComm ‘Supramolecular Chemistry’
web-based themed issue marking the International Year of Chemistry
2011.
z Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthesis and
additional details on crystallographic and NMR studies. CCDC
812988–812990. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other
electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c1cc10806a
c
6560 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6560–6562
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011