B. Liu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 1680–1684
1683
TIPS
N
H
N
Cl
Pd catalyst 7
R
O
O
B
O
S
2M K3PO4
+
O
N
1,4-dioxane
O
S
O
NH
N
N
TIPS
R
6a R= acetyl
6c R= methanesulfonyl
8a R=acetyl, 68%
8b R=methanesulfonyl, 45%
H
N
R
N
HN
TBAF
THF
Cl
Pd
N
P
O
S
O
H
Pd catalyst 7
9a
R=acetyl
9b
R=methanesulfonyl
Scheme 4.
in mind, we decide to test these conditions with aryl chloride sub-
strates. To our delight, with slight modification, the reaction pro-
vided moderate yields with various substrates (Table 2).
ino)(20-dimethylamino-1,10-biphenyl-2-yl) palladium(II) (Scheme
4, catalyst 7), is an efficient catalyst for aryl chloride substrates.12
Indeed, the same catalytic system worked well on current sub-
strates, such as 6a and 6c from Table 2, to provide the desired
products in 68% and 45% yield, respectively (Scheme 4).13 Finally,
compounds 8a and 8b were converted into final target molecules
9a and 9b, after removal of the TIPS protection group.14
In summary, we have reported an efficient and diversified ap-
proach to synthesize 1,3,5-trisubstituted benzenes in conjunction
with the development of our drug candidate. This protocol utilizes
recently developed Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions to form
sulfur–carbon, nitrogen–carbon, and carbon–carbon bonds
sequentially and selectively. Thus, this method allows one to intro-
duce diversified functional groups on the central phenyl ring. Aryl/
heteroaryl sulfide, sulfonamide, and amide, as well as aryl groups
could be introduced into the 1,3,5 position of the benzene by a
three-step sequence. The chemistry reported here is suitable for
building focused libraries.
To accelerate the reaction, microwave conditions were imple-
mented. The reaction mixture was heated at 120 °C using a micro-
wave reactor for 1 h. As demonstrated in Table 2, the coupling
between dichlorobenzene substrates and acetamide or methane-
sulfonamide afforded moderate to good yields (31–78%) of desired
products.10 Increasing the reaction temperature or the reaction
time did not significantly change the reaction outcome. As men-
tioned earlier, there are very few reports of Pd-catalyzed coupling
between aryl chlorides and sulfonamides, especially for alkyl sul-
fonamides like methanesulfonamide, which is an important func-
tional group in medicinal chemistry. As shown in entry 3, Table
2, the dichloride substrate successfully coupled with methanesul-
fonamide to afford the desired product in a 42% yield. The linker
could be thioether (entries 4 and 5) or sulfone. Interestingly, when
the substrate bearing a sulfonamide group was treated with an
acetamide under these coupling conditions, the desired product
was not obtained at all (entry 6). Instead, the bond was formed
on the sulfonamide site, presumably because of the higher reactiv-
ity of the sulfonamide than the acetamide.11 This side reaction
could be prevented by protection of the sulfonamide with a Boc
group. It was observed that the Boc group partially fell off during
the subsequent coupling reaction. In this case, the desired product
was obtained in 30% yield over two steps after the removal of the
Boc group with HCl (entry 7). As demonstrated in these examples,
aryl chlorides are convenient precursors to access aryl sulfona-
mides and amides. Due to the lower reactivity of the second chlo-
ride after the first amidation reaction, the bis-coupling product was
not observed under current conditions. Although the examples
listed in Table 2 are for dichlorobenzene substrates, we expect
the current conditions will also work with monochlorobenzene
having proper electronic properties.
References and notes
1. Shetty, R. S.; Lee, Y.; Liu, B.; Husain, A.; Joseph, R. W.; Lu, Y.; Nelson, D.;
Mihelcic, J.; Chao, W.; Moffett, K. K.; Schumacher, A.; Flubacher, D.; Stojanovic,
A.; Bukhtiyarova, M.; Williams, K.; Lee, K.-J.; Ochman, A. R.; Saporito, M. S.;
Moore, W. R.; Flynn, G. A.; Dorsey, B. D.; Springman, E. B.; Fujimoto, T.; Kelly, M.
J. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 179.
2. Clark, R. D.; Caroon, J. M.; Isaac, N. E.; McClelland, D. L.; Michel, A. D.; Petty, T.
A.; Rosenkranz, R. P.; Waterbury, L. D. J. Pharm. Sci. 1987, 76, 411.
3. (a) Satyanarayana, J.; Reddy, K. R.; Ila, H.; Junjappa, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992,
33, 6173; (b) Shi, F.; Smith, M. R., III; Maleczka, R. E., Jr. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1411.
4. (a) Burton, G.; Cao, P.; Li, G.; Rivero, R. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4373; (b) Yin, J.;
Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1101; (c) Forsa, B. P.; Dooleweerdta, K.; Zenga,
Q.; Buchwald, S. L. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 6576.
5. Fu, G. C.; Littke, A. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4176.
6. Batmanghelich, S.; Turner, J. R. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1987, 11, 378.
7. Itoh, T.; Mase, T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4587.
8. Schopfer, U.; Schlapbach, A. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 3069.
9. Sato, K.; Hyodo, M.; Aoki, M.; Zheng, X.-Q.; Noyori, R. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2469.
10. General procedure for Pd-mediated carbon–nitrogen bond formation:
a
The last step is the introduction of the indole group via a Suzuki
reaction to form the carbon–carbon bond. Previously, we have
reported that the preformed catalyst, chloro(di-2-norbornylphosph-
microwave vial was charged with Pd2(dba)3 or Pd2(dba)3.CHCl3 (0.1 equiv)
and Xantphos (0.11 equiv) followed by 1,4-dioxane. The mixture was stirred at
room temperature for 15 min. To this vial was then added acetamide or