and hetaryl azides exhibit significant thermal or shock
sensitivity.6 Moreover, the benzylic or pseudobenzylic
halide precursors required to prepare the azides are often
not readily available.
is the synthetic equivalent of a primary aminomethyl unit, and
the development of SuzukiÀMiyaura cross-coupling reactions
of this trifluoroborate with various aryl and hetaryl chlorides.
The requisite potassium Boc-protected aminomethyl-
trifluoroborate 2 was prepared in 75% yield over four
steps in a “one-pot” process from 2-(chloromethyl)-
4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane 1 by applying
our recently published protocol (eq 1).7,12 Pleasingly, the
prepared aminomethyltrifluoroborate 2 was air stable
and could be stored indefinitely on the bench without
decomposition.
Scheme 1
With Boc-protected aminomethyltrifluoroborate suc-
cessfully prepared, we first investigated its application in
SuzukiÀMiyaura cross-coupling reactions with 4-chlor-
obenzonitrile and 4-chloroanisole as coupling partners
to determine optimal conditions. After screening several
catalysts, ligands, bases, and reaction times, the combi-
nation of 5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol % of SPhos or
XPhos (Figure 2), and 3 equiv of K2CO3 in toluene/H2O
(4:1, 0.25 M) for 22 h emerged as the best reaction
conditions. Indeed, we decided to use two different
ligands, SPhos and XPhos, because they were often
complementary in their reactivity with various aryl
and hetaryl chlorides. Importantly, the trifluoroborate
could be employed in virtually a stoichiometric quantity
in the cross-coupling reactions. We employed these
conditions to explore cross-couplings with diverse aryl
chlorides as electrophiles (Table 1).
Interestingly, reported syntheses and transition metal
catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of primary aminomethyl
organometallics or their equivalents are rare (Scheme 1,
path C). Recently, we demonstrated the synthesis and cross-
coupling reactions of amidomethyltrifluoroborates7 and
tertiary aminomethyltrifluoroborates.8 Among these, the
sulfonamidomethyl derivatives could be utilized to generate
primary amines [e.g., using the p-toluenesulfonyl (tosyl)
group as the amine protecting group].7b However, the
removal of tosyl groups requires the use of harsh conditions9
compared to the Boc group, for example, which can be
easily removed under either acidic or basic conditions.10
Although a patent exists that refers to the use of the
N-phthalimido group as an amine protecting group in
SuzukiÀMiyaura coupling reactions,11 the scope of that
process has not been widely disseminated, and we have
been unable to develop a broadly applicable procedure
based on such a protocol. Furthermore, hydrazine is often
used to remove the phthalimido group, and its toxicity and
instability to storage and handling prevent its routine use
in this capacity.
The development of the aminomethylating and amido-
methylating procedures in our laboratory7 ledustoinvestigate
the synthesis of alternative protected primary aminomethyl-
trifluoroborates. Herein, we disclose a successful synthesis of
potassium Boc-protected aminomethyltrifluoroborate, which
Figure 2. SPhos and XPhos.
Electron-neutral (entries 1À3), electron-donating (entries
4À7), and electron-withdrawing groups (entries 8À12) were
suitable coupling partners in SuzukiÀMiyaura cross-cou-
pling reactions. Surprisingly, sterically hindered di-ortho
substituted electrophiles provided as high a yield as the less
hindered monosubstituted electrophiles (compare entries 2
and 3). The cross-coupling reactions using 4-chloroanisole
as an electrophile furnished the product 3d in 78% yield on a
larger scale (4.0 mmol) with a lower catalyst loading (2 mol
%, entry 4). Of particular note, access to aminomethylated
(7) (a) Molander, G. A.; Hiebel, M.-A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4876.
(b) Molander, G. A.; Fleury-Bregeot, N.; Hiebel, M.-A. Org. Lett. 2011,
13, 16937.
(8) (a) Molander, G. A.; Sandrock, D. L. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1597.
(b) Hasnık, Z; Pohl, R.; Hocek, M. Synthesis 2009, 8, 1309.
´
(9) (a) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999. (b) Kocienski, P. J.
Protecting Groups, 3rd ed.; Georg Thieme: Stuttgart, NY, 2005. (c) Hasan, I.;
Marinelli, E. R.; Lin, L.-C. C.; Fowler, F. W.; Levy, A. B. J. Org. Chem. 1981,
46, 157. (d) Ravinder, K.; Reddy, V.; Mahesh, K. C.; Narasimhulu, M.;
Venkateswarlu, Y. Synth. Commun. 2007, 37, 281.
(10) (a) du Vigneaud, V.; Behrens, O. K. J. Biol. Chem. 1937, 117, 27.
(b) Kharasch, M. S.; Priestley, H. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61, 3425.
(c) Snyder, H. R.; Heckert, R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 2006. (d) Li,
S.; Gortler, L. B.; Waring, A.; Battisti, A.; Bank, S.; Closson, W. D.;
Wriede, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5311.
ꢀ
(12) (a) Matteson, D. S. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1535. (b) Matteson,
D. S. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 1859. (c) Matteson, D. S. Tetrahedron 1998,
54, 10555.
(11) Tanaka, K. PCT Int. Appl. WO 2008007670, 2008.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 15, 2011
3957