This work was conducted within the King’s College
London-UCL Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre supported
by Cancer Research UK & EPSRC, in association with MRC
and DoH (UK). The work was supported by an MRC
studentship to DJB and by the Centre of Excellence in Medical
Engineering funded by the Wellcome Trust and EPSRC under
grants (WT 088641/Z/09/Z). JRB was supported in part by a
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive
Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS
Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London
and King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. YM was
supported in part by a grant from the British Heart Foundation
Centre of Excellence at King’s College London. We thank
Wellcome Trust for grant support enabling PET-CT imaging.
Selected samples were sent for mass spectral analysis at the
EPSRC Mass Spectrometry Service Centre (Swansea) and at
the Mass Spectrometry Facility, King’s College, London
(Franklin Wilkins Building).
Notes and references
z Animal studies were carried out in accordance with UK Research
Councils’ and Medical Research Charities’ guidelines on Responsibility
in the Use of Animals in Bioscience Research, under a UK Home
Office licence and were approved by the King’s College London Local
Ethics Committee.
Fig. 4 PET-CT images of mice 90 min after intravenous injection of
(A) 68Ga-YM-103-C2Ac and (B) unchelated 68Ga.
which binds to PS in a Ca2+-dependent manner and is being
investigated as an imaging agent for cell death) into which a
cysteine residue has been engineered18 for purposes of bio-
conjugate synthesis. Incubation of 10 (or its HCl addition
product, which is also formed as an intermediate during the
synthesis of 10, see ESIw) with C2Ac produced the bio-
conjugate YM-103-C2Ac whose electrospray mass spectrum
showed the incorporation of a single molecule of 10. The
conjugate (20 mg, 1 mg mlꢀ1, 63 mM) was incubated with
freshly-eluted 68Ga in 0.5 M ammonium acetate buffer,
pH B5.5, giving quantitative labelling after 5 min as deter-
mined by TLC.
1 W. A. P. Breeman and A. M. Verbruggen, Eur. J. Nucl. Med.
Mol. Imaging, 2007, 34, 97.
2 D. Reichert, J. Lewis and C. Anderson, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1999,
184, 3.
3 A. Heppeler, S. Froidevaux, H. Macke, E. Jermann, M. Behe,
¨
P. Powell and M. Hennig, Chem.–Eur. J., 1999, 5, 1974.
4 J. Kowalski, M. Henze, J. Schuhmacher, H. R. Macke,
¨
M. Hofmann and U. Haberkorn, Mol. Imaging Biol., 2003, 5, 42.
5 I. Velikyan, H. Maecke and B. Langstrom, Bioconjugate Chem.,
2008, 19, 569.
6 C. Wangler, B. Wangler, S. Lehner, A. Elsner, A. Todica,
P. Bartenstein, M. Hacker and R. Schirrmacher, J. Nucl. Med.,
2011, 52, 586.
7 Y. Sun, C. Anderson, T. Pajeau, D. Reichert, R. Hancock,
R. Motekaitis, A. Martell and M. Welch, J. Med. Chem., 1996,
39, 458.
The radiolabelled conjugate showed retention of calcium-
dependent binding to PS in a red blood cell binding assay
in vitro. A PET imaging study was therefore carried out in a
normal mouse (Fig. 4A).z After 90 min post-injection the 68Ga
was located almost exclusively in the kidney, with some
excretion to the bladder, in contrast to the distribution
throughout the whole mouse observed (Fig. 4B) when
uncomplexed 68Ga was injected. This demonstrates that
68Ga is not released from the conjugate in vivo during the
imaging period. We conclude that the tris(hydroxypyridinone)
ligand CP256 is an excellent chelator for gallium and can be
radiolabelled with gallium isotopes more quickly, with higher
yield, under milder conditions and to significantly higher
specific activity than the currently established chelators
DOTA, NOTA and HBED. The complex is extremely stable
in serum and when challenged with excess apotransferrin. The
maleimide derivative 10 can be conjugated site-specifically to
cysteine residues and the resulting bioconjugate is efficiently
labelled with 68Ga to high specific activity. It is likely to
become the bifunctional chelator of choice for labelling of
sensitive proteins with 68Ga.
8 M. Eder, B. Wangler, S. Knackmuss, F. LeGall, M. Little,
U. Haberkorn, W. Mier and M. Eisenhut, Eur. J. Nucl. Med.
Mol. Imaging, 2008, 35, 1878.
9 S. Wagner and M. Welch, J. Nucl. Med., 1979, 20, 428.
10 B. Koop, S. N. Reske and B. Neumaier, Radiochim. Acta, 2007, 95,
39.
11 E. Boros, C. L. Ferreira, J. F. Cawthray, E. W. Price,
B. O. Patrick, D. W. Wester, M. J. Adam and C. Orvig, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 15726.
12 P. Smith-Jones, B. Stolz, C. Bruns, R. Albert, H. Reist, R. Fridrich
and H. Macke, J. Nucl. Med., 1994, 35, 317.
¨
13 K. Eisenwiener, M. Prata, I. Buschmann, H. Zhang, A. Santos,
S. Wenger, J. Reubi and H. Macke, Bioconjugate Chem., 2002, 13,
530.
¨
14 M. Santos, M. Gil, S. Marques, L. Gano, G. Cantinho and
S. Chaves, J. Inorg. Biochem., 2002, 92, 43.
15 S. Chaves, S. M. Marques, A. M. F. Matos, A. Nunes, L. Gano,
T. Tuccinardi, A. Martinelli and M. A. Santos, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2010, 16, 10535.
16 S. Chaves, A. C. Mendonc¸ a, S. M. Marques, M. I. Prata,
A. C. Santos, A. F. Martins, C. F. G. C. Geraldes and
M. A. Santos, J. Inorg. Biochem., 2011, 105, 31.
17 T. Zhou, H. Neubert, D. Y. Liu, Z. D. Liu, Y. M. Ma, X. L. Kong,
W. Luo, S. Mark and R. C. Hider, J. Med. Chem., 2006, 49, 4171.
18 R. Tavare, R. Torres Martin De Rosales, P. J. Blower and G. E.
´
D. Mullen, Bioconjugate Chem., 2009, 20, 2071.
c
7070 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 7068–7070
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011