4162
Y. Li et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 4161–4163
Table 1
Et3N
H
Screening for the reaction conditionsa
Ph
Cl
N
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
N
Ph
Ph
COOEt
-Et3N HCl
COOEt
COOEt
N
N H
N
N2
N
N
Cl
COOEt
H
N
N
Ph
Ph
Ph
Et3N
Ph
A
+
N
N
Et3N
N
Ph
N
Ph
N3
1a
2a
Ph
1a
CH3CN
rt,12 h
N
3a
B
2a
Entry
Solvent
Reaction temperature (°C)
Base
Yieldb (%)
-Et3N HN3
1
2
3
THF
PhMe
DMF
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
50
80
25
25
25
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
0
Trace
20
69
71
64
58
0
52
47
52
72
67
Ph
Ph
4
CH2Cl2
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
5
Et3N
6c
Cs2CO3
K2CO3
Pyridine
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
N
COOEt
N
7d
8
Ph
9c
3a
10e
11f
12g
13h
Scheme 1. Possible mechanism for this reaction.
Et3N
Et3N
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (1.25 mmol), base (1.75 mmol), solvent
(8 mL), 12 h.
larly, either electron donating or electron withdrawing on aryl part
of 2-azido-3-aryllacrylate (1a–g) (Table 2, entries 1, 9–14) did not
affect reactions and afforded the desired products (3a, 3i–n)
smoothly. When R2 in substrate 2 was the alkyl group (Table 2, en-
try 15), the desired product 3o was obtained in lower yield.
Based on the investigations of reaction condition and substrate
diversity, a possible mechanism for this reaction is described in
Scheme 1. At the beginning, nitrilimines A, generated in situ from
2a by treatment with triethylamine, reacted with 1a to form inter-
mediate B via [3+2] cycloaddition reaction with high regioselectiv-
ity. Aromatization of the resulting heterocycle B by kicking off
hydrogen azide assisted by triethylamine constructed the final
product 3a.
b
Isolated yields referred to 1a.
Reaction was performed for 8 h.
Reaction was performed for 10 h.
Reaction was performed for 6 h.
Compound 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (1 mmol), base (1.5 mmol).
Compound 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (1.5 mmol), base (2.0 mmol).
Compound 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (1.25 mmol), base (2.0 mmol).
c
d
e
f
g
h
entry 8). By raising the reaction temperature to 50 or 80 °C, short-
ening the reaction time accordingly as indicated in the notes of Ta-
ble 1, yields were influenced (Table 1, entries 9 and 10). Besides
these variations, the suitable ratio of starting materials to base
(1a:2a:Et3N) was found to be 1:2.5:3.5 (Table 1, entries 11–13) con-
sidering both yields and benign to environment.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we subse-
quently examined the scope of this transformation. A number of
substituted hydrazonyl chlorides (2a–h) (Table 2, entries 1–8)
were tested and found to tolerate the reaction. No significant sub-
stituent effect was observed for component 2. Compounds 3a–h
were prepared in yields between 56% and 73% accordingly. Simi-
In conclusion, we have developed an efficient method to con-
struct tetrasubstituted pyrazoles from 2-azidoacrylates and hyd-
razonyl chlorides in moderate to good yields.13 Reactions are
carried under mild condition and with high regioselectivity. A rea-
sonable mechanism, including [3+2] cycloaddition was postulated.
Acknowledgment
Ping Lu and Yanguang Wang thank the National Nature Science
Foundation of China (Nos. 21032005 and 20972137) for financial
support.
Table 2
Scope of the reactiona
Cl
R1
COOEt
H
N
Et3N, C H3CN
25oC, 12h
Supplementary data
COOEt
R1
R2
N
R3
+
R2
N
R3
N3
N
3
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
1
2
Entry
1 (R1)
2 (R2/R3)
3
Yieldb (%)
References and notes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1a (C6H5)
2a (C6H5/C6H5)
2b (4-MeC6H4/C6H5)
2c (4-MeOC6H4/C6H5)
2d (4-BrC6H4/C6H5)
2e (2-ClC6H4/C6H5)
2f (C6H5/4-MeC6H4)
2g (C6H5/2-ClC6H4)
2h (C6H5/4-ClC6H4)
2a
2a
2a
2a
2a
2a
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
3i
3j
3k
3l
3m
3n
3o
71
63
56
73
69
62
66
61
66
62
70
67
72
62
43
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1. Penning, T. D.; Talley, J. J.; Bertenshaw, S. R.; Carter, J. S.; Collins, P. W.; Docter,
S.; Graneto, M. J.; Lee, L. F.; Malecha, J. W.; Miyashiro, J. M.; Rogers, R. S.; Rogier,
D. J.; Yu, S. S.; Anderson, G. D.; Burton, E. G.; Cogburn, J. N.; Gregory, S. A.;
Koboldt, C. M.; Perkins, W. E.; Seibert, K.; Veenhuizen, A. W.; Zhang, Y. Y.;
Isakson, P. C. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1347–1365.
2. Terrett, N. K.; Bell, A. S.; Brown, D.; Ellis, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6,
1819–1824.
1b (4-MeOC6H4)
1c (4-MeC6H4)
1d (4-ClC6H4)
1e (3-NO2C6H4)
1f (4-PhC6H4)
1g (2-naphthyl)
1a
3. Deng, X. H.; Mani, N. S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1307–1310.
4. Willy, B.; Müller, T. J. J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2082–2085.
5. (a) Chandrasekhar, S.; Rajaiah, G.; Srihari, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6599–
6601; (b) Katritzky, A. R.; Wang, M. Y.; Zhang, S. M.; Voronkov, M. V. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 6787–6791; (c) Aggarwal, V. K.; de Vicente, J.; Bonnert, R. V. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5381–5383; (d) Shen, D. M.; Shu, M.; Chapman, K. T. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 2789–2792; (e) Deng, X. H.; Mani, N. S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3505–
3508.
2i (i-Pr/C6H5)
a
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), 2 (1.25 mmol), Et3N (1.75 mmol), CH3CN
(8 mL).
6. (a) Croce, P. D.; Rosa, C. L.; Zecchi, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 2621–
2624; (b) Gao, D. T.; Zhai, H. M.; Parvez, M.; Back, T. G. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
8057–8068.
b
Isolated yields referred to 1.