Organic Letters
Letter
(4) (a) Iizuka, H.; Irie, H.; Masaki, N.; Osaki, K.; Uyeo, S. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1973, 125−126. (b) Ye, Y.; Qin, G.-W.; Xu, R.-S.
J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 665−669.
mechanism is described in Scheme 4: PPh3 reacts with DEAD
to form intermediate I, which is consistent with the Mitsunobu
reaction. Intermediate I acquires a proton from PPTS to form
intermediate II, which is then attracted by substrate 2 to form
intermediate III. Intermediate III undergoes molecular
rearrangement to form intermediate IV, which then converts
to V. Intermediate V undergoes Nazarov rearrangement,
yielding intermediate VI, which produces the desired product
1 after deprotonation. Without PPTS, intermediate I obtained a
proton from compound 2, formed intermediate VII, and
rearranged to intermediate VIII, after ring open and ring close,
to yield the product 1. The byproduct is formed though the
leaving the OPPh3 of intermediate VII. PPTS can transform a
proton to intermeditate I and, thus, form intermediate III
instead of intermediate VII. In this way, the byproduct route is
depressed. What’s more, the transformation from intermediate
IV to intermediate V is easier than the transformation from
intermediate VIII to intermediate IX, and the rate of aza-
Piancatelli rearrangement is increased.
(5) Ito, K.; Suzuki, F.; Haruna, M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1978, 733−734.
(6) Dake, G. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 3467−3492.
(7) Palmer, L. I.; Alaniz, J. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7167−
7170.
(8) Palmer, L. I.; Read de Alaniz, J. R. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 476−479.
(9) Wenz, D. R.; Read de Alaniz, J. R. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3250−
3253.
(10) Veits, G. K.; Wenz, D. R.; Palmer, L. I.; Amant, A. S.; Hein, J. E.;
Alaniz, J. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 8465−8469.
(11) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1981, 1−28.
(12) Boger, D. L.; Mckie, J. A.; Nishi, T.; Ogiku, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 2301−2302.
(13) Appel, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1975, 14, 801−811.
(14) Schmida, R.; Antoulas, S.; Ruttimann, A.; Schmid, M.; Vecchi,
̈
M.; Weiserb, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1990, 73, 1276−1299.
In conclusion, we have developed an intramolecular aza-
Piancatelli rearrangement that is suitable for both alkyl- and
arylamine furylcarbinols. This is the first report of the aza-
Piancatelli rearrangement of alkylamines; thus, the cleaving of
C−N bonds for arylamines or N−O bonds for hydroxylamine
can be avoided. The reaction is promoted by PPh3/DEAD for
arylamine furylcarbinols and PPh3/DEAD/PPTS for alkylamine
furylcarbinols at room temperature. Because it proceeds
without Lewis acids or high temperatures, this reaction is
expected to be tolerant to acid-sensitive substrates or substrates
that decompose at high temperatures.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
Full experimental details, spectroscopic data, and 1H and
13C NMR spectra for the compounds (PDF)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
■
ORCID
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This work was supported by the Science and Technology
Commission of Shanghai Municipality (15DZ2281500,
NSFC2167020782) and the Knowledge Innovation Program
of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KGCX2-YW-202-2).
REFERENCES
■
(1) Daly, J. W.; Karle, I.; Myers, C. W.; Tokuyama, T.; Waters, J. A.;
Witkop, B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1971, 68, 1870−1875.
(2) Paudler, W. W.; Kerley, G. I.; McKay, J. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28,
2194−2197.
(3) Kuramoto, M.; Tong, C.; Yamada, K.; Chiba, T.; Hayashi, Y.;
Uemura, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3867−3870.
D
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX