the strategy for the [3 þ 2] coupling of the quinone acetal
1 with a series of alkene nucleophiles 2 utilizing an
activated Brønsted acid in situ formed in equilibrium
by the aid of the hydrogen bond donor solvent, hexa-
fluoroisopropanol (HFIP), is reported (eq 1).
[3 þ 2] coupling concerns the following rational steps
involving charged quinone acetal B generation promoted
by the combined acid species A: Preactivation of the
Brønsted acid first occurs by coordinating the hydrogen
bond donor, HFIP, to the Lewis basic functionality of the
acid (Brønsted acid activation by HFIP).10 The combined
acid would work as an indispensable promoter to generate
the charged species B of the quinone acetal 1a in equili-
brium in the polar solvent, which can then react with the
nucleophile 2a at the less hindered carbon site remote from
the acetal rather than the sterically congested acetal
carbon. This regioselective trend might also be pro-
nounced by the steric factor of the associating acid in
the proposed acetal activation mode. Finally, cyclization
of the carbonyl moiety in the keto-type tautomer C was
accompanied by aromatization as the driving force to
affordthe formal [3 þ 2] coupling product 3aa. To confirm
the hypothesis, we envisioned the use of a Brønsted acid
having a good hydrogen bond-accepting functionality,
and for such acids, a series of carboxylic acids and related
compounds showing varied pH values were evaluated.
As a result, the different product yields were observed
during the optimization of the carboxylic acids in the [3 þ 2]
coupling (Table 1). These results clearly indicated that
Initially, the [3 þ 2] coupling of the quinone acetal 1a
(eq 1, R = H) with allyltrimethylsilane2a8 was testedusing
our reported system along with aluminum pillared mon-
tmorillonite in HFIP.5 This indeed produced the coupling
adduct, dihydrobenzofuran 3aa, in an expectedly (61%),
but the reaction was very slow and required a very long
time (1 day) to consume all the starting material. Further-
more, this method was too case-sensitive for the combina-
tion of the quinone acetal 1a and nucleophile 2a to allow
formation of the extended series of cycloadducts 3. The
montmorillonites unfortunately showed a limited general-
ity and performance in the [3 þ 2] coupling; hence the
Scheme 1. [3 þ 2] Coupling Strategy Based on the Combined
Use of Brønsted Acids and HFIP
Table 1. Effect of the Acid Activator and Solventa
entry
activator
solvent
time
yield of 3aab,c
1
2
acetic acid
HFIP/DCM 7 h
19%
n.d.
4-methyl
//
1 day
benzoic acid
benzoic acid
4-nitro-
3
4
//
//
2 h
2 h
9%
14%
benzoic acid
pentafluoro-
benzoic acid
2,4,6-trichloro-
benzoic acid
phthalic acid
5d
6
//
//
1 h
86%
10 min (90%)e
10 min
59%
7
8
//
10 min
1 h
58%
21%
pentafluoro-
benzoic acid
TFE/DCM
a The screenings were carried out with 2 equiv of acid, 5 equiv of
allyltrimethylsilane 2a at room temperature unless otherwise noted. For
more details of other acids see SI. b Isolated yield after purification.
c Formation of noncyclized allylation product 4aa was observed (see SI).
d Acid (1 equiv) and 2a (2 equiv). e Performed at 0 °C.
screening of several types of Brønsted acid activators was
envisioned instead as just alternatives. As illustrated in
Scheme 1, we hypothesized the [3 þ 2] coupling of the
quinone acetal 1a based on the combined use of a
Brønsted acid and highly polar HFIP having a super
hydrogen bond donor ability, but not showing the prop-
erty as a hydrogen bond acceptor.9 The mechanism of the
only carboxylic acids with a suitable acidic proton
range11 showed good performance in order to develop
(7) For the synthesis and utility of the dihydrobenzofurans, see a
review: Bertolini, F.; Pineschi, M. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2009, 41, 385.
(8) For allylsilane in cyclizations, see the examples: (a) Schmidt,
(10) (a) Allard, B.; Casadevall, A.; Casadevall, E.; Largeau, C. Nouv.
J. Chim. 1980, 4, 539. (b) Deaton, M. V.; Ciufolini, M. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 2409. Recent works of H2O2 activation by the hydrogen
bonding: (c) Neimann, K.; Neumann, R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2861. (d)
Berkessel, A.; Adrio, J. A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 275.
€
€
A. W.; Knoelker, H.-J. Synlett 2010, 2207. (b) Knoelker, H.-J. J. Prakt.
Chem. 1997, 339, 304. (c) Berard, D.; Racicot, L.; Sabot, C.; Canesi, S.
ꢀ
Synlett 2008, 1076. (d) Berard, D.; Giroux, M. A.; Racicot, L.; Sabot, C.;
(11) (a) Bordwell, F. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 456. (b) In
Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Paquette,
L. A., Crich, D., Fuchs, P. L., Molander, G. A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons:
Chichester, 2009; Vol. 10, pp 7654ꢀ7656. The pKa order of the tested
> C6H5CO2H >
Canesi, S. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 7537.
(9) Reviews and accounts: (a) Kita, Y.; Takada, T.; Tohma, H. Pure
Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 627. (b) Eberson, L.; Hartshorn, M. P.; Persson,
O.; Radner, F. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2105. (c) Begue, J.; Bonnet-delpon,
D.; Crousse, B. Synlett 2004, 18. (d) Dohi, T.; Yamaoka, N.; Kita, Y.
Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 5775.
acids is as follows: AcOH, 4-MeC6H4CO2H
4-NO2C6H4CO2H > C6F5CO2H > 2,4,6-Cl-C6H2CO2H, phthalic
acid > CF3CO2H > MeSO3H > CF3SO3H.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 18, 2011
4815