J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3209-3211
3209
methods have important limitations. At first, KF was
applied, under an inert atmosphere,22 but a large excess
of nitroalkane (20 times) was necessary. Then, a weakly
basic macroreticular resin24 and various sorts of alu-
mina23,28 were used as heterogeneous bases. However,
these bases have been shown to be effective only with a
restricted class of electrophilic olefins such as R,â-
unsaturated esters24 or conjugated enones.23,28 Adsorbing
KF on neutral alumina25 greatly enhances the activity
of this basic catalyst, but the yields were low to moderate
and an excess of nitroalkane (4-8 times) was required.
Aliquat 336 provides27 a useful catalyst for the title
reaction with unsaturated esters, but again, an excess
(3-15 times) of nitro compound and the use of ultrasound
irradiations were required. Recently, layered zirconium
hydrogen phosphate has been reported as a new hetero-
geneous catalyst,26 but only one example was described.
The requirement for a large excess of nitroalkane in
many of the above-reported methods is a serious draw-
back, expecially when valuable nitro derivatives are
employed.
With the aim to avoid all these limitations, we explored
several catalysts, and now, we report a significant
improvement on this reaction by using commercial Am-
berlyst A-27, a macroreticular anionic resin with the
[-N(CH3)3+] as functional group.
The reaction was performed by adding 8-12 g of
Amberlyst A-27 to a mixture of 0.05 mol of nitroalkane
1 and 0.05 mol of alkene 2 at 0 °C, without solvent, and
then leaving the reaction at room temperature (see Table
1), followed by extraction with diethyl ether, filtration,
evaporation, and purification by flash chromatography,
affording the pure adduct 3 in high yield.
Under these conditions both primary and secondary
nitroalkanes easily react with a variety of electrophilic
alkenes, even those substituted in the â-position (entries
l, m , and q, Table 1). The yields of products vary from
good to excellent, and the reaction was found to be
substantially independent of catalyst:starting material
ratio.
The results reported in Table 1 refer to the solvent-
free reaction; however, different solvents such as THF
and Et2O can be used without a significant change of the
yield.
Of special interest is the conjugate addition of nitroal-
kanes to the 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one (entry q, Table
1), because the nitro group facilitates a variety of carbon-
carbon bond-forming processes and offers a wide range
of efficient methods for its transformation into other
functionalities.3,4 Thus, further elaborations of the ob-
tained lactone derivative are possible.
Compared with other heterogeneous methods, our
procedure offers better yields with a large variety of
substrates without the need for an excess of nitroalkane.
Am ber lyst A-27, a n Efficien t
Heter ogen eou s Ca ta lyst for th e Mich a el
Rea ction of Nitr oa lk a n es w ith
â-Su bstitu ted Alk en e Accep tor s
Roberto Ballini,* Paola Marziali, and
Andrea Mozzicafreddo
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche dell’Universita`, Via S.
Agostino no. 1, 62032 Camerino, Italy
Received November 21, 1995
The Michael addition of nitroalkanes to electrophilic
double bonds provides a convenient method1,2 for the
preparation of a number of useful synthetic intermedi-
ates3,4 since the nitro group can be transformed into
various functionalities.3
Different organic bases such as tetramethylguanidine,5-8
potassium fluoride/18-crown-6,9,10 sodium hydride/18-
crown-6,11 diisopropylamine,6,12 potassium tert-butox-
ide,6,11 tri-n-butylphosphine,15 triphenyphosphine,11,16 1,8-
diazobicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene,17 and tetrabutylammonium
fluoride11 have been used in homogeneous solutions.
Under these conditions, multiple Michael adducts are
often formed in significant amounts. This problem is
most acute in the case of vinylcarbonyl derivatives.
In recent years there has been a tremendous upsurge
of interest in various chemical transformations mediated
by heterogeneous catalysts, and the associated literature
is extensive.18-21 Innumerable chemical bonds are bro-
ken and new chemical bonds are formed during these
catalytic processes, and such events frequently occur
without a significant change of the catalyst. Moreover,
under heterogeneous catalyst, chemical transformations
can occur with better efficiencies, higher purity of the
products, and an easier workup.
Different heterogeneous catalysts22-28 have been em-
ployed for the Michael reaction of nitroalkanes, but these
(1) Padeken, H. G. In Houben-Weyl, 4th ed.; Thieme: Stuttgart,
1971; Vol. x/1, p 9.
(2) Bergmann, E. D.; Ginsburg, D.; Pappo, R. Org. React. 1959, 10,
179.
(3) Seebach, D.; Colvin, E. W.; Leher, F.; Weller, T. Chimia 1979,
33, 1.
(4) Rosini, G.; Ballini, R. Synthesis 1988, 833.
(5) Pollini, G. P.; Barco, A.; De Giuli, G. Synthesis 1972, 44.
(6) Bakuzis, P.; Bakuzis, M. L. F.; Weingartner, T. F. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1978, 2371.
(7) Miller, D. D.; Moorthy, K. B.; Hamada, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983,
24, 555.
(8) Stevens, R. V.; Lee, A. W. M. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1982, 102.
(9) Clark, J . H.; Cork, D. G. Chem. Lett. 1983, 1145.
(10) Clark, J . H.; Cork, D. G. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1982,
635.
(11) Nakashita, Y.; Hesse, M. Helv. Chim. Acta 1983, 66, 845.
(12) McMurry, J . E.; Melton, J . J . Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 4367.
(13) Miyakoshi, T.; Saito, S. Yukagaku 1982, 31, 35; Chem. Abstr.
1982, 96, 142217.
(14) Miyakoshi, T.; Saito, S. Yukagaku 1982, 31, 231; Chem. Abstr.
1982, 97, 38526.
(15) Miyakoshi, T.; Saito, S. Yukagaku 1982, 31, 143; Chem. Abstr.
1982, 97, 6536.
(16) Ono, N.; Miyake, H.; Kaji, A. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1983, 875.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l. All 1H NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 at 300
MHz. Chemical shifts are expressed in ppm downfield from
TMS as internal standard. All the reactions were monitored
(17) Ono, N.; Kamimura, A.; Kaji, A. Synthesis 1984, 226.
(18) Posner, G. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 487.
(19) Bailey, D. C.; Langer, S. H. Chem. Rev. 1981, 81, 109.
(20) Laszlo, P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 121.
(21) (a) Schwarz, J . A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 477. (b) Gates, B. C.
Ibid. 511. (c) Goodman, D. W. Ibid. 523. (d) Hattori, H. Ibid. 537. (e)
Boudart, M. Ibid. 661.
(23) Rosini, G.; Marotta, E.; Ballini, R.; Petrini, M. Synthesis 1986,
237.
(24) Ballini, R.; Petrini, M.; Rosini, G. Synthesis 1987, 711.
(25) Bergbreiter, D. E.; Lalonde, J . J . J . Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1601.
(26) Costantino, U.; Marmottini, F.; Curini, M.; Rosati, O. Chem.
Lett. 1993, 22, 333.
(22) Clark, J . H.; Cork, D. G.; Gibbs, H. W. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1983, 2253.
(27) J ouglet, B.; Blanco, L.; Rousseau, G. Synlett 1991, 907.
(28) Ranu, B. C.; Bhar, S. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 1327.
S0022-3263(95)02055-X CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society