oxidative coupling of electron-rich (hetero)arenes and,
more importantly, cheap, nontoxic, commercially avail-
able, and environmentally benign. Herein we report our
findings concerning the FeCl3-mediated dimerization of 1-
and 2-naphthylamines.
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Conditions for Fe-Mediated
Oxidative Coupling of Naphthylaminesa
As a starting point, N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine (1a) was
chosen as a model substrate to screen suitable reaction
conditions (Table 1). Some initial experimentation demon-
strated that the homocoupling reaction was facilitated by
the use of additional bases which consume the Hþ ions
produced in the process, and K2CO3 (finely ground when
used) was the base of choice. The reaction was very
sensitive to the nature of solvents used (runs 1ꢀ8). Aro-
matic hydrocarbon (run 1) gave a mediocre yield of the
desired product 2a; polar solvents, such as acetonitrile (run 2),
methanol (run 3), and pyridine (run 4), seemed to be
poor; ethereal solvents (runs 5 and 6) performed relatively
well, and particularly THF (run 6) brought about a good
yield of 65%; and chlorinated alkanes (runs 7 and 8) were
found to be more suitable solvents for the coupling reac-
tion, among which 1,2-dichloroethane (run 8) was the best.
Apparently, the use of excess FeCl3 greatly accelerated the
reaction with a comparable high yield (run 9 vs run 8); in
contrast, decreasing the amounts of FeCl3 significantly
slowed the reaction and reduced the yield (runs 10 and 11).
In contrast, hydrated iron(III) chloride produced an ad-
verse effect on the reaction (run 12). For the other iron
sources used, Fe(acac)3 (run 13) and FeF3 (run 14), which
contain counteranions that are to dissociate from the
central iron ion, almost did not initiate the reaction;
Fe(NO3)3 9H2O (run 15) and Fe2(SO4)3 xH2O (run 16)
run
[Fe] (equiv)
FeCl3 (1.2)
solvent
time (h)
yieldb (%)
1
2
toluene
MeCN
MeOH
pyridine
THF
24
24
24
24
18
24
6
45
37
FeCl3 (1.2)
FeCl3 (1.2)
FeCl3 (1.2)
FeCl3 (1.2)
FeCl3 (1.2)
FeCl3 (1.2)
FeCl3 (1.2)
FeCl3 (4)
3
40
4
22
5
65
6
dioxane
CH2Cl2
DCEc
DCE
46
7
73
81
8
1
9
0.5
16
48
24
24
24
24
24
24
78
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
FeCl3 (0.5)
FeCl3 (0.1)
DCE
63
DCE
20
FeCl3 6H2O (1.2)
DCE
62
3
Fe(acac)3 (1.2)
FeF3 (1.2)
DCE
trace
trace
58
DCE
Fe(NO3)3 9H2O (1.2)
DCE
3
Fe2(SO4)3 xH2O (1.2)
DCE
21
3
FeSO4 7H2O (1.2)
DCE
0
3
a Conditions: 1a (1 mmol), K2CO3 (1 equiv), solvent (6 mL), room
temperature, in air; the proceeding of the reaction was monitored by
TLC. b Isolated yields. c 1,2-Dichloroethane.
described the KMnO4 oxidative dimerization of several
N-aryl-2-naphthylamines in low yields; 2,20-diamino-1,10-
binaphthyl was obtained via the thermal rearrangement of
2,20-hydrazonaphthalene7 or by the oxidative coupling of
2-aminonaphthalene using Cu,8a,b Fe,8c and m-CPBA,8d
respectively, as oxidants, and N,N0-diphenyl-2,20-diamino-
1,10-binaphthyl was provided in very low yield by an
electrochemical oxidation process.9 In view of the
foregoing, it remains desirable to explore new, general
methodology for the preparation of naphthidines and
BINAMs.
Our recent studies on nickel-catalyzed aromatic amina-
tions made N-substituted naphthylamines easily
accessible,10 allowing us to systematically investigate the
synthesis of naphthidines and BINAMs on the basis of
their oxidative coupling reactions. On the other hand,
iron(III) species were considered for utilization in this
study because they are the well-known promoters for the
3
3
gave the product in low yields; and no reaction occurred
when the iron(II) salt (FeSO4 7H2O) was used (run 17).
3
Finally, the optimized reaction conditions were set as run 8
in Table 1.
With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, an array
of 1- and 2-naphthylamine derivatives 1 was used as the
substrates in this reaction (Table 2). As can be seen in
Table 2, most of the N-monoaryl-substituted 1-naphthyl-
amines were excellent substrates, offering a clean conver-
sion of starting materials and high yields of the desired
naphthidines (2aꢀc and 2eꢀg). But in the cases of 2d, 2h,
and 2i, complete conversions could be achieved via a
prolonged reaction time, but some unindentified side
reactions occurred apparently, and thus the reduced yields
of the coupled products were afforded. In the above-
mentioned cases, the substituents on the N-aryl imposed
remarkable effects onthe reaction. Interestingly, the effects
depended largely on the site rather than the nature of
the substituents. The substituents at the para position of
N-aryl ring, whether electron-donating (2b and 2c vs 2a) or
electron-withdrawing (2f and 2g vs 2a), promoted the
reaction, but the ortho- or meta-substituents (2d, 2e, 2h,
and 2i vs 2a) would be unfavorable for the reaction.
Presumably, the reason might be related to the mechanism
of this reaction. 1-Naphthylamine with the free amino
group afforded a low yield of the dimer product
because the reaction was not only slow but also gave
large amounts of byproducts (2j). N-Monoalkyl (2kꢀm)
(7) (a) Miyano, S.; Nawa, M.; Mori, A.; Hashimoto, H. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1984, 57, 2171. (b) Shine, H. J.; Gruzecka, E.; Subotkowski,
W.; Brownawel, M.; San Filippo, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107,
3219. (c) Brown, K. J.; Berry, M. S.; Murdoch, J. R. J. Org. Chem. 1985,
50, 4345.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢁ
(8) (a) Smrcina, M.; Lorene, M.; Hanus, V.; Kocovsky, P. Synlett
ꢀ
ꢀ
1991, 231. (b) Smrcina, M.; Lorene, M.; Hanus, V.; Sedmera, P.;
ꢀ
ꢁ
Kocovsky, P. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1917. (c) Stoddard, J. M.; Nguyen,
L.; Mata-Chavez, H.; Nguyen, K. Chem. Commun. 2007, 1240. (d)
Wang, K.; Hu, Y.; Wu, M.; Liu, Z.; Su, B.; Yu, A.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.
Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 9135.
(9) Hornback, J. M.; Gssage, H. E. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 541.
(10) (a) Gao, C.-Y.; Yang, L.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1624. (b)
Huang, J.-H.; Yang, L.-M. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3750.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 18, 2011
4951