Copper(II) complexes of hydroxyflavone derivatives
purposes owing to its properties of high electrical conductivity,
chemical stability, plasticity and capacity to form alloys with
many metals. Copper is widespread in the environment, where
its determination is necessary because it is known to be toxic
at higher concentrations and causes dyslexia, hypoglycemia,
gastrointestinal problems and Wilson’s disease.[19,20] Cu(II) is also
involved in the causation and cure of cancer.[21]
To design improved drugs that target the cellular DNA and
to understand the mechanism of action at the molecular level,
we therefore decided to examine the synthesis and biological
properties of Schiff base copper complexes derived from 4-
aminoantipyrine/o-aminothiazoleandotherligands.Furthermore,
we have tested the antimicrobial activity of the synthesized
ligands and their complexes using bacteria such as Staphylococcus
aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumaniae, Proteus vulgaris
and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fungi such as Aspergillus niger,
Rhizopus stolonifer, Aspergillus flavus, Rhizoctonia bataicola and
Candida albicans. Superoxide dismutase and antioxidant activities
of copper complexes have also been measured and compared.
molar absorption coefficient was taken as 6600 M−1 cm−1. Stock
solutions were kept at 4 ◦C and used after not more than 4 days.
CT DNA was purchased from Himedia Chemicals Co. Ltd.
Preparation of Ligands L1 –L5
5-Hydroxyflavone was synthesized from 2,6-dihydroxyaceto-
phenoneaccordingtothemethodofLookeret al.[22] andidentified
by elemental analysis, melting point, IR and UV spectrum.
Equimolaramountsof5-hydroxyflavoneand4-aminoantipyrine
(L1), o-aminophenol (L2), o-aminobenzoic acid (L3), o-amino-
thiazole (L4) and thiosemicarbazide (L5) were dissolved in ethanol
(40 ml). Aceticacid(1.0 ml)wasaddedtothissolution. Thesolution
was stirred for 3 h and precipitates formed. The precipitate was
filtered and washed with water and ethanol.
L1
Yield: 76%. Anal. calcd for C26H21N3O3: C, 73.74; H, 4.99; N, 9.90.
Found: C, 73.68; H, 4.91; N, 9.82. FAB mass spectrometry (FAB-MS):
m/z 424 [M + 1]. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 3.0 (1H, s, 3-H),
6.4–7.5 (13H, m, Ar–H), 1.5 (3H, s, H3C–C), 1.8 (s, 3H, H3C–N) and
11.2 (1H, s, O–H, D2O exchangeable). 13C-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3,
ppm): 10.1 (H3C–C), 18.9 (H3C–N), 142.2 (H3C–C), 164.2 (C O),
152.8 ( C–N), 122.5 (C-2), 116.8 (C-3), 153.9 (C-4), 117.7 (C-5),
145.8 (C-6), 122.5 (C-7), 125.8 (C-8), 156.2 (C-9), 120.1 (C-10), 132.5
(C-1ꢁ), 126.3 (C-2ꢁ, 6ꢁ), 140.6 (C-3ꢁ, 5ꢁ), 132.5 (C-4ꢁ), 125.4 (C-1ꢁꢁ),
118.2 (C-2ꢁꢁ, 6ꢁꢁ), 117.5 (C-3ꢁꢁ, 5ꢁꢁ) and 120.4 (C-4ꢁꢁ).
Experimental
Materials and Methods
The chemicals used were of AnalaR grade. Copper(II) acetate
was obtained from Merck. Micro analytical data (Carlo Erba
1108, accuracy 5%) of the compounds were recorded at the
Regional Sophisticated Instrumentation Center, Central Drug
Research Institute, Lucknow. The amount of copper present in
the copper complexes was estimated using ammonium oxalate
method. The NMR spectra of the ligands were recorded using
Tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. Chemical shifts (δ)
are expressed in units of parts per million relative to TMS. The
Fast Atom Bombardment (FAB) mass spectra of the ligands and
their complexes were recorded on a Jeol SX 102/DA-6000 mass
spectrometer/data system using argon/xenon (6 kV, 10 mA) as
the FAB gas. The accelerating voltage was 10 kV and the spectra
were recorded at room temperature using m-nitrobenzylalcohol
(NBA) as the matrix. Molar conductance of the copper complexes
was measured in Dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) solution using a
coronation digital conductivity meter. The IR spectra of the ligands
and their copper complexes were recorded on a Perkin–Elmer
783 spectrophotometer in 4000–200 cm−1 range using a KBr disc.
Electronic spectra were recorded with a Systronics 2201 double
beam UV–vis spectrophotometer in the 200–1100 nm region. The
magnetic susceptibility values were calculated using the relation
µeff = 2.83 (χm.T)1/2. The diamagnetic corrections were made by
Pascal’s constant and Hg[Co(SCN)4] was used as a calibrant. The
ESR spectra of the copper complexes were recorded at 300 and
77 K on a Varian E112 X-band spectrometer. Cyclic voltammetric
measurements were performed using a glassy carbon working
electrode, Pt wire auxiliary electrode and an Ag–AgCl reference
electrode. Tetrabutylammoniumperchlorate was used as the sup-
porting electrolyte. All solutions were purged with N2 for 30 min
prior to each set of experiments. The X-ray diffractometer system
Jeol JDX 8030 was used to record powder data for the copper
complexes, at the Central Elelectrochemical Research Institute,
Karaikudi. Solutions of CT DNA in 50 mM NaCl/5 mM Tris–HCl (pH
= 7.0) gave a ratio of UV absorbance at 260 and 280 nm, A260/A280
of ca. 1.8–1.9, indicating that the DNA was sufficiently free of
protein contamination. The DNA concentration was determined
by the UV absorbance at 260 nm after 1 : 100 dilutions. The
L2
Yield: 60%. Anal. calcd for C21H15NO3: C, 76.58; H, 4.59; N, 4.25.
Found: C, 76.50; H, 4.52; N, 4.18. FAB mass spectrometry (FAB-MS),
m/z330[M+1].1H-NMR(400 MHz,CDCl3)δ:3.1(1H,s,3-H),6.6–7.8
(12H,m,Ar–H)and11.2and10.8(2H,s,O–H,D2Oexchangeable,5-
hydroxyflavone and o-aminophenol moities). 13C-NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3, ppm): 150.6 (C-2), 102.4 (C-3), 154.6 (C-4), 142.8 (C-5), 144.6
(C-6), 121.4 (C-7), 124.9 (C-8), 154.6 (C-9), 118.8 (C-10), 133.6 (C-1ꢁ),
124.3 (C-2ꢁ, 6ꢁ), 126.5 (C-3ꢁ, 5ꢁ), 126.4 (C-4ꢁ), 130.6 (C-1ꢁꢁ), 115.2
(C-2ꢁꢁ), 120.6 (C-3ꢁꢁ), 119.2 (C-4ꢁꢁ), 126.2 (C-5ꢁꢁ) and 140.8 (C-6ꢁꢁ).
L3
Yield: 65%. Anal. calcd for C22H15NO4: C, 73.94; H, 4.23; N, 3.91.
Found: C, 73.88; H, 4.16; N, 3.88. FAB mass spectrometry (FAB-MS),
m/z358[M+1].1H-NMR(400 MHz,CDCl3)δ:2.9(1H,s,3-H),6.7–7.9
(12H, m, Ar–H), 11.6 and 10.4 (2H, s, O–H, D2O exchangeable,
5-hydroxyflavone and o-aminobenzoic acid moities). 13C-NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): 149.4 (C-2), 110.2 (C-3), 154.5 (C N), 115.6
(C-5), 146.4 (C-6), 122.8 (C-7), 126.4 (C-8), 152.6 (C-9), 119.9 (C-10),
132.5(C-1ꢁ), 125.4(C-2ꢁ, 6ꢁ), 127.6(C-3ꢁ, 5ꢁ), 126.5(C-4ꢁ), 148.6(C-1ꢁꢁ),
113.4 (C-2ꢁꢁ), 132.6 (C-3ꢁꢁ), 116.5 (C-4ꢁꢁ), 128.9 (C-5ꢁꢁ), 140.8 (C-6ꢁꢁ)
and 168.2 (COOH).
L4
Yield: 62%. Anal. calcd for C18H12N2O2S: C, 67.49; H, 3.78; N, 8.75.
Found: C, 67.42; H, 3.72; N, 8.69. Fast atom bombardment mass
spectrometry(FAB-MS), m/z 322[M+ 1]. 1H-NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ: 2.7 (1H, s, 3-H), 5.1(1H, dd, J, 10.5 Hz, -CH CH-) and 5.4 (1H,
dd, J, 10.5 Hz, -CH CH-), 5.9–7.9 (8H, m, Ar–H), 12.9 (1H, s, O–H,
D2O exchangeable). 13C-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 149.4 (C-2), 110.2
(C-3), 154.5 (C N), 115.6 (C-5), 147.4 (C-6), 122.6 (C-7), 126.9 (C-8),
154.6 (C-9), 121.9 (C-10), 132.5 (C-1ꢁ), 125.4 (C-2ꢁ, 6ꢁ), 127.6 (C-3ꢁ,
5ꢁ), 126.5 (C-4ꢁ), 158.6 (C-11), 103.4 (C-12) and 148.9 (C-13).
c
Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2011, 25, 704–717
Copyright ꢀ 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/aoc