inner peripheral face.2 On the basis of this stereochemical
principle, the stereoselective transformation of alkenes has
been accomplished in conformationally restricted macro-
cylic systems.3 However, this kind of strategy is often pre-
vented by the number of stable conformers and their easy
interconversion by low-energy-barrier pseudorotation.
Recently, we have reported a novel cyclic amide 1 that
has only two enantiomeric conformers at ambient tem-
perature and displays stable planar chirality arising from
its topological constraint (Figure 1).4 Both of its two
olefins are approximately perpendicular to the ring and,
hence, amide 1 will be a superior substrate for the above-
mentioned stereoselective transformation. Herein, we re-
port the stereo- and group-selective transformation of 1 by
a variety of intermolecular reactions and a stereospecific
transannular reaction of the resulting products.
explained by its distortion: the C3ꢀC4 bond is twisted by
ca. 30°, while the C7ꢀC8 bond is almost flat (ca. 3°) as per
X-ray crystallographic analyses.4a,8,9 A similar reaction of
(S)-1b (R, R0 = H) (>98% ee) also provides the C3ꢀC4
epoxide (3R, 4R)-2b as the major product in 72% yield,
although it requires a much longer reaction time [m-CPBA
(1.5 equiv) at 0 °C for 22 h]. All of the obtained epoxides
2ꢀ4 are diastereomerically and enantiomerically pure, and
their stereochemistry attests to the fact that the epoxida-
tion reaction only occurs from the outer peripheral faces,
as we expected.
Scheme 1. Epoxidation of 1
Similar C3ꢀC4 olefin selectivity and stereoselectivity
were observed in cyclopropanation reactions. As shown
in Scheme 2, both the Simmons-Smith reaction and di-
chlorocyclopropanation provide 5 (X = H or Cl) as the
major product.
Scheme 2. Cyclopropanation of 1a
Figure 1. Stable confomers of 1 and their expected reaction sites.
At the outset, we examined the epoxidation reaction of 1
using m-CPBA (Scheme 1).5 A reaction of (S)-1a (R, R0 =
Me) (>98% ee) with 1.3 equiv of m-CPBA at 0 °C for 4 h
provided C3ꢀC4 epoxide (3R, 4R)-2a, C7ꢀC8 epoxide
(7R, 8S)-3a, and diepoxide (3R, 4R, 7R, 8S)-4a in 64, 10,
and 24% yields, respectively.6,7 The observed group selec-
tivity between the C3ꢀC4 olefin and C7ꢀC8 olefin can be
(3) For representative examples of natural product synthesis based
on stereoselective transformation of macrocyclic compounds, see: (a)
Still, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 2493–2495. (b) Larionov, O. V.;
Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2954–2955.
(4) (a) Tomooka, K.; Suzuki, M.; Shimada, M.; Yanagitsuru, S.;
Uehara, K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 963. For the ether congeners, see: (b)
Tomooka, K.; Komine, N.; Fujiki, D.; Nakai, T.; Yanagitsuru, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12182. For the organosulfur congeners, see: (c)
Uehara, K.; Tomooka, K. Chem. Lett. 2009, 38, 1028.
(8) The relationship between alkene strain and reactivity of epoxida-
tion has been investigated, see: Shea, K. J.; Kim, J.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 3044–3051.
(9) In contrast, a similar epoxidation of acyclic congener a shows low
and opposite group selectivity (b/c = 34: 66).
(5) Enantio-enriched 1 can be prepared by the enantioselective
cyclization of readily available acyclic precursors, see: Tomooka, K.;
Uehara, K.; Nishikawa, R.; Suzuki, M.; Igawa, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 9232–9233.
(6) All new compounds were fully characterized by 1H-, 13C NMR,
IR, and HRMS analysis. The enantiomeric purity of products was
determined by a HPLC analysis using a chiral stationary column; see
Supporting Information for details.
(7) The structures of 4a, 7b, 8, 10a, 11, 12a, 12c, 13b, and 14b were
determined by X-ray crystallography; see Supporting Information.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 18, 2011
4927