C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
methyl groups in the trifluoro-tert-butoxide are inequivalent (with
resonances at 1.27 and 1.92 ppm in toluene-d8). Therefore, we
suspect that {W(NAr′)[OCMe(CF3)2]2}2 and {W(NAr′)[OCMe2-
(CF3)]2}2 also contain unsupported WdW bonds. (No X-ray study
of either species has yet been successful.)15
Finally, we recently found that Mo(NAr)(CH-t-Bu)(CH2-t-Bu)-
(OC6F5),4 which is much more stable than W(NAr)(CH-t-Bu)-
(CH2-t-Bu)(OC6F5), will react with 10 equiv of trans-3-hexene at
25 °C to yield [Mo(NAr)(CH2-t-Bu)(OC6F5)]2, which was shown
in an X-ray study to be a homochiral molecule related to [W(NAr)-
(CH2-t-Bu)(OC6F5)]2 (Figure 1).14 Therefore unsupported MdM
bonds are not restricted to W and Re.
To the best of our knowledge, no Mo or W dimers are known
that contain “unsupported” MdM bonds in the presence of
potentially bridging ligands. (See also discussion in refs 3 and 10.)
These species are strikingly different from a compound such as
[W(OCH2-t-Bu)4]x, a polymeric species that contains bridging
neopentoxides.13 We are now in the process of expanding the library
of synthetically accessible MdM species and exploring their
fundamental reactions.
Figure 1. Chem3D drawing of the structure of centrosymmetric [W(NAr)-
(CH2-t-Bu)(OC6F5)]2. (W-N ) 1.749(3) Å, W-O ) 1.933(2) Å, W-C )
2.139(3) Å, W-W# ) 2.4445(3) Å, W-N(1)-C(1) ) 165.5(3)°, W-O(1)-
C(13) ) 146.7(3)°, W-C(19)-C(20) ) 119.3(3)°, N(1)-W-W# ) 90.38-
(10)°, O(1)-W-W# ) 113.17(9)°, C(19)-W-W# ) 98.08(10)°, N(1)-
W-O(1) ) 132.30(13)°, N(1)-W-C(19) ) 106.23(15)°, O(1)-W-C(19)
) 110.31(14)°).
Acknowledgment. We thank the National Science Foundation
(CHE-0138495) for supporting this research and D. Yandulov for
assistance in refining the crystal structure.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, labeled
thermal ellipsoid drawing, crystal data and structure refinement, atomic
coordinates, bond lengths and angles, and anisotropic displacement
parameters for [W(NAr)(CH2-t-Bu)(OC6F5)]2. X-ray crystallographic
data in CIF format. This material is available free of charge via the
found to be energetically preferred in theoretical studies of model
compounds.10
The reaction between W(NAr′)(CH-t-Bu)(dme)(triflate)2 (Ar′ )
2,6-Me2C6H3)11 and two equivalents of t-BuCH2MgCl yields
W(NAr′)(CH-t-Bu)(CH2-t-Bu)2 as an orange powder, which upon
treatment with pentafluorophenol yields W(NAr′)(CH2-t-Bu)3-
(OC6F5) quantitatively. Upon heating a toluene-d8 solution (0.10
M) of W(NAr′)(CH2-t-Bu)3(OC6F5) to 60 °C, W(NAr′)(CH-t-Bu)-
(CH2-t-Bu)(OC6F5) forms and decomposes to yield t-BuCHdCH-
t-Bu and sparingly soluble [W(NAr)(CH2-t-Bu)(OC6F5)]2. On the
basis of the inequivalent neopentyl methylene protons in the proton
NMR spectrum of [W(NAr)(CH2-t-Bu)(OC6F5)]2 in toluene-d8 we
propose that this compound also contains an unsupported WdW
bond. W(NAr′)(CH2-t-Bu)3(OC6F5) evolves neopentane intramo-
lecularly more slowly than W(NAr)(CH2-t-Bu)3(OC6F5), while
intermediate W(NAr′)(CH-t-Bu)(CH2-t-Bu)(OC6F5) decomposes
bimolecularly more quickly than intermediate W(NAr)(CH-t-Bu)-
(CH2-t-Bu)(OC6F5) at the concentrations employed. Both can be
ascribed to subtle steric differences between the NAr and NAr′
groups.
It has been reported that unstable W(CHEt)(NAr′)[OCMe-
(CF3)2]2, which is prepared by treating W(CH-t-Bu)(NAr′)[OCMe-
(CF3)2]2 with cis-3-hexene, decomposes to yield {W(NAr′)[OCMe-
(CF3)2]2}2.2 It was proposed that {W(NAr′)[OCMe(CF3)2]2}2 contains
bridging imido ligands, although the presence of two inequivalent
trifluoromethyl groups in the carbon NMR spectrum of {W(NAr′)-
[OCMe(CF3)2]2}2 is inconsistent with a structure analogous to that
of [Mo(µ-NAr)(O-t-Bu)2]2 (Ar ) 2,6-i-Pr2C6H3).1 We have shown
that W(CH-t-Bu)(NAr′)[OCMe2(CF3)]2 also reacts with cis-2-
pentene to yield {W(NAr′)[OCMe2(CF3)]2}2 in which the two
References
(1) Robbins, J.; Bazan, G. C.; Murdzek, J. S.; O’Regan, M. B.; Schrock, R.
R. Organometallics 1991, 10, 2902-2907.
(2) Schrock, R. R.; DePue, R. T.; Feldman, J.; Yap, K. B.; Yang, D. C.;
Davis, W. M.; Park, L. Y.; DiMare, M.; Schofield, M.; Anhaus, J.;
Walborsky, E.; Evitt, E.; Kru¨ger, C.; Betz, P. Organometallics 1990, 9,
2262-2275.
(3) Toreki, R.; Schrock, R. R.; Vale, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
3610-3611.
(4) Sinha, A.; Schrock, R. R. Organometallics 2004, 23, 1643-1645.
(5) The feasibility of this approach was first demonstrated by A. Sinha with
t-BuCH2MgCl; this reaction mixture tends to contain a significant quantity
of W(NAr)(CH2-t-Bu)3Cl.
(6) Schrock, R. R., Ed. Reactions of Coordinated Ligands; Plenum: New
York, 1986.
(7) Feldman, J.; Schrock, R. R. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 39, 1-73.
(8) Pedersen, S. F.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 7483-
7491.
(9) Preparative scale reactions were carried out in pentane.
(10) Barckholtz, T. A.; Bursten, B. E.; Niccolai, G. P.; Casey, C. P. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1994, 478, 153-160.
(11) This species was prepared by a method analogous to that employed to
prepare W(NAr)(CH-t-Bu)(dme)(triflate)2; see Supporting Information for
details.
(12) Tsang, W. C. P.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Alexander, J. B.; Bonitatebus, P. J. J.;
Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2652-
2666.
(13) Chisholm, M. H.; Streib, W. E.; Tiedtke, D. B.; Wu, D. D. Chem. Eur. J.
1998, 4, 1470-1479.
(14) A. Sinha; unpublished results to be reported in due course.
(15) Note added in proof: An X-ray structure of the latter has confirmed a
structure that is, overall, similar to that shown in Figure 1 and that contains
an unbridged WdW bond 2.4905(3) Å long.
JA0400988
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 31, 2004 9527