A. Maquille et al. / Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 214 (2010) 224–229
229
ion are identical to those obtained after CID of product (6). There-
fore, these two products only differ by the addition of a hydroxyl
together with the reduction of a double bond. This product might
be a secondary photoproduct originating from the photolysis of
product (7) since a significant increase of its corresponding peak
is observed at long irradiation times.
The phototoxicity and the photoallergic reaction of the drug
could be explained by the formation of photolysis products such
as products (9) or product (10) with aldehyde and ketones that
could readily react with proteins following degradation of the drug
in the superficial layer of the body.
The m/z 453 product originates from the addition of a hydroxyl
on the molecule and from the reduction of a double bond. CID of this
product leads to losses of water (m/z 435), the m/z 323 fragment
correspond to the breakage between the carbon and the piperazine
ring, indicated no changes on this part of the lateral chain. The m/z
281 product, with a formula of C14H8OF3S, indicates the presence of
an oxygen on the thioxanthene ring although the fragment m/z 265
results from the loss of that oxygen together with the whole lateral
chain. Therefore, this product could correspond to the addition of
a hydroxyl radical on the double bond from the lateral chain. Due
to its higher electrophilicity, the addition is favored on the ternary
carbon from the thioxanthene ring to give product (7).
4. Conclusions
Flupentixol is rapidly degraded upon UV irradiation of solutions
up to ca. 60%. At that point, the concentration of the photoprod-
ucts in the solution is certainly sufficiently high to compete with
flupentixol for light absorption and photoreaction. The major pho-
todegradation pathway occurs through hydroxyl addition on the
double bond. For the majority of the photoproducts, the thioxan-
thene ring remains intact although oxidation into thioxanthone
was observed for three minor products.
Acknowledgments
Product (5) corresponds to the addition of two oxygen atoms
on the parent drug together with the reduction of a double bond.
Fragmentation of this product into a m/z 339 ion indicates that the
piperazineethanol part was not modified. The m/z 297 fragment
corresponds to the loss of C9H20N2O, which is the whole lateral
chain. Therefore, the modification has occurred on the ring and may
correspond to addition of a hydroxyl on the double bond adjacent
to the ring together with oxidation of the sulfur into a S-oxide.
The exact structure of product (2) could not be determined. It
contains no fluoride and its fragmentation pattern indicates that
the lateral chain is the same as the parent drug. The position of the
three oxygen atoms on the ring could not be determined by mass
spectrometry.
The authors would like to thank the Belgian National Fund for
Scientific Research (FNRS) (FRFC 2.4555.08), the Special Fund for
Research (FSR) and the faculty of medicine of UCL for their financial
support for the acquisition of the LTQ-Orbitrap.
References
[1] G. Cosa, Photodegradation and photosensitization in pharmaceutical products:
assessing drug phototoxicity, Pure Appl. Chem. 76 (2004) 263–275.
[2] European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA), Photosta-
bility testing of new active substances and medicinal products, ICH Topic Q1B,
step 5 (CPMP/ICH/279/95), EMEA, London, 1995.
[3] B. Eberlein-König, A. Bindl, B. Przybilla, Phototoxic properties of neuroleptic
drugs, Dermatology 194 (1997) 131–135.
The fragmentation of product (1) with a m/z of 425 fragments
results in the formation of daughter ions with m/z of 409 (loss
of water), 364 (C19H17F3NOS), 338 and 281. This later fragment
indicates the presence of an oxygen on the ring. The fragmenta-
tion pattern is concordant with the breakage of the piperazine ring
together with oxidation of the sulfur from the thioxanthene ring.
[4] M. Petrovic´, M.D. Hernando, M.S. Díaz-Cruz, D. Barceló, Liquid chromato-
graphy–tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of pharmaceutical residues
in environmental samples: a review, J. Chromatogr. A 1067 (2005) 1–14.
[5] O.A. Jones, N. Voulvoulis, J.N. Lester, Human pharmaceuticals in the aquatic
environment a review, Environ. Technol. 22 (2001) 1383–1394.
[6] O. González, C. Sans, S. Espulgas, S. Malato, Application of solar advanced
oxidation processes to the degradation of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole, Pho-
tochem. Photobiol. Sci. 8 (2009) 1032–1039.
[7] A.L. Boreen, W.A. Arnold, K. McNeill, Photochemical fate of sulfa drugs in
the aquatic environment: sulfa drugs containing five-membered heterocyclic
groups, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 3933–3940.
3.4. Photolysis mechanisms
[8] D. Błe˛dzka, D. Gryglik, J.S. Miller, Photodegradation of butylparaben in aqueous
solutions by 254 nm irradiation, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 203 (2009)
131–136.
[9] A. Piram, A. Salvador, C. Verne, B. Herbreteau, R. Faure, Photolysis of beta-
blockers in environmental waters, Chemosphere 73 (2008) 1265–1271.
[10] B.L. Edhlund, W.A. Arnold, K. McNeill, Aquatic photochemistry of nitrofuran
antibiotics, Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2006) 5422–5427.
[11] C. Sirtori, A. Zapata, S. Malato, W. Gernjak, A.R. Fernández-Alba, A. Agüera, Solar
photocatalytic treatment of quinolones: intermediates and toxicity evaluation,
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 8 (2009) 644–651.
The main photodegradation mechanism of flupentixol appears
to be due to the addition of a hydroxyl group on the double bond
adjacent to the ring to give product (7). The decrease in the con-
centration of this product after long irradiation times indicates
that it also undergo photolysis into secondary photoproducts such
as products (3a) and (5) whose corresponding peaks appears to
increase.
In the proposed structures of the photolysis products, no break-
down of the thioxanthene ring is observed which suggest that
tion of the drug. The attack of oxygen on the sulfur is commonly
observed following UV irradiation although in the case of flupen-
tixol it accounts only for a small portion of the drug degradation,
contrary to other sulfur containing cycles such as dilthiazem for
which the S-oxide was the major degradation product [16].
The breakage of the piperazine ring following UV irradiation has
already been described for ciprofloxacine by Mella et al. [18]. This
reaction necessitates hydrogen abstraction from the ring followed
by the attack of water on the radical and hydrogen transfer to give
an aldehyde that may correspond to product (8). According to this
mechanism, further photolysis of product (8) leads to product (6),
which is a secondary photoproduct.
[12] A. Maquille, J.-L. Habib-Jiwan, LC–MS characterization of photolysis products
from UV irradiated metoclopramide solutions, J. Photochem. A: Chem. 205
(2009) 197–202.
[13] European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA), Note
for guidance on impurities in new medicinal products, Topic Q3B, step 4
(CPMP/ICH/2738/99), London, 2006.
[14] European Pharmacopoeia, 5th edition, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2005.
[15] European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA), Note
for guidance on impurities in new medicinal products, Topic Q3B, step 4
(CPMP/ICH/282/95), London, 1996.
[16] V. Andrisano, P. Hrelia, R. Gotti, A. Leoni, V. Cavrini, Photostability and photo-
toxicity studies on diltiazem, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 25 (2001) 589–597.
[17] T.G. Vasconcelos, D.M. Henriques, A. König, F.A. Martins, K. Kümmerer, Photo-
degradation of the antimicrobial ciprofloxacin at high pH: identification and
biodegradability assessment of the primary by-products, Chemosphere 76
(2009) 487–493.
[18] M. Mella, E. Fasani, A. Albini, Photochemistry of 1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-
dihydro-4-oxo-7-(piperazin-1-yl)quinoline-3-carboxylic acid (=ciprofloxacin)
in aqueous solution, Helv. Chim. Acta 84 (2001) 2508–2519.