Communications
Table 2: Substrate scope.
tivity was observed when the reac-
tion was performed with 2,6-dime-
thylaniline (Table 3, entry 6).
A mechanistic proposal for the
formation of indole 7 and indolin-3-
one 22 from azide 5 is presented in
Scheme 4. The activation of the
alkyne moiety in 5 by the gold(I)
complex could lead, after extrusion
of N2, to the formation of an
intermediate a-imino gold carbene
6. This species could undergo a
subsequent nucleophilic addition
that would furnish 17. Indole 7
could then be produced from 19
either via iminium 18 by a proto-
tropy/demetalation sequence or via
19 by a protodemetalation/tauto-
merization sequence.[19] Alterna-
tively, intermediate 19 might be
produced by a direct insertion of
Entry Substrate
NuH
t
[h]
Product
d.r.[b] Yield
[%][a]
8
1
1
15a 3:1
92
81
R1 =H
8
2
1.5
15b 4:1
15c 3:1
R1 =H
8
3
2
76
79
R1 =H
8
4
1.5
15d
-
R1 =H
À
the gold-carbene 6 into the Nu H
bond.[20] However, this carbenoid
reactivity seems to be less probable
since no cyclopropanation product
could be formed when an alkene
was used as a trapping agent.[21,22]
The formation of indolin-3-one 22,
which was observed when an allylic
alcohol was used as the nucleophile,
can be rationalized by a Claisen
rearrangement of 20.[23,24] This
transformation could be thermally
induced, or more probably gold
catalyzed (via gold complex 21)
given the mildness of the reaction
conditions under which the trans-
formation is performed (50–608C).
Indolin-3-one 22 could alternatively
be formed from iminum 18 via
intermediate 23.
8
5
12
15e 9:1
59
79
R1 =H
14a
6
2
15 f
4:1
R1 =3-Cl
14b
7
24
16
15g
15h
–
–
79
65
R1 =3-OMe
14c
8
R1 =3-CF3
14d
9
1.5
15i
–
91
R1 =4-CO2Me
To futher highlight the synthetic
potential of this new gold-catalyzed
transformation and its usefulness
for the rapid and efficient produc-
tion of a range of heterocyclic
[a] Isolated yield. [b] Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. 1,2-DCE=1,2-dichloroethane.
rearrangement (Table 3). The reaction could be performed
with a primary and a secondary alcohol, as exemplified by the
efficient formation of the 3-alkoxyindoles 16a and 16b (99%
and 80%; Table 3, entries 1 and 2). Surprisingly, the poorly
nucleophilic tert-butanol could also be used in this trans-
formation (Table 3, entry 3) and the corresponding 3-tert-
butoxyindole 16c was obtained in a moderate 41% yield.
Water also proved to be a good nucleophilic partner, as
attested by the efficient formation of indolin-3-one 16d
(Table 3, entry 4). The use of phenol did not result in the
formation of the corresponding 3-phenoxyindole. 3-Arylin-
dole 16e was obtained instead in 69% yield as the result of a
Friedel–Crafts reaction (Table 3, entry 5).[18] A similar reac-
compounds, a series of aryl azides, possessing various
substituents at the alkyne terminus, were converted under
the optimized reaction conditions (Table 1, entry 8) into
either 3-substituted indoles or indolin-3-ones in the presence
of various nucleophiles. The collection of examples presented
in Scheme 5 reflect the diversity of products that can be
produced and the tolerance for a variety of common func-
tional groups (halogen, ester, et0her, amide, imide, alkene,
azole) present either on the aromatic ring, on the alkyne
substituent, or on the nucleophile.[25]
In conclusion, we have developed a new gold(I)-catalyzed
reaction that converts 2-alkynyl arylazides into indolin-3-ones
and 3-substituted indoles. The reaction, which is performed
7356
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7354 –7358