have been extensively studied.4 The intramolecular aza-
Michael reaction has also been useful, yielding natural
products and pharmaceutically relevant nitrogen-containing
heterocyclic small molecules.5 While the catalytic enantiose-
lective aza-Michael reaction has been demonstrated, the
diastereoselective variant yielding one or the other of two
possible stereoisomers is less common. A common strategy
entails treating chiral substrates with chiral catalysts.6 Anti-
podes of the catalyst can, in principle, yield either diastereoi-
somer via “matched” or “mismatched” pathways7 (Figure1).
An alternative approach is the use of distinct achiral catalysts
to access different diastereoisomers through distinct mechan-
istic pathways.2a,b
L-phenylalinol.9 We initially investigated reported methods
of intramolecular aza-Michael reactions.10 Strong Lewis
acids such as BF3 OEt2 led to decomposition of the
3
starting material (Scheme 1A). Organocatalysts includ-
ing chiral proline derivatives and cinchona alkaloids were
also examined. Although these catalysts were reported to
be effective for enal electrophiles with high enantioselec-
tivity, no product formation was observed for the enone
substrate 1a (Scheme 1B). Under basic conditions using
KO-t-Bu (1.0 equiv), 3,5-disubstituted morpholine 2a was
obtained in 54% yield and a moderate 2:1 dr, favoring
the cis isomer; however, decomposition was also detected
(Scheme 1C).
Studies performed by Spencer,11 Kobayashi,12 and
others13 demonstrate that transition-metal complexes can
catalyze intermolecular aza-Michael reactions. When
(MeCN)2PdCl2 (0.1 equiv) was used in dry DCM, Michael
addition was achieved in 5 h in 89% yield. Moreover, the
diastereoselectivity increased to 93:7, favoring the cis iso-
mer (Scheme 1D). Although we imagined that the trans
isomer might be obtained by applying chiral ligands to
palladium(II), this proved not to be the case. Chiral
phosphine ligands14 (BINAP, “Trost ligand”) significantly
diminished the rate of the reaction (Scheme 2E), and
pyridine ligands15 (BOX, PyBOX) promoted no more than
15% conversion over 48 h at room temperature (Scheme 1F).
The Pd(II) chiral counteranion strategy16 was also examined
without encouraging results (Scheme 1G).
Scheme 1. Intramolecular Aza-Michael Addition of an Amino
Alcohol Derived Carbamate-Tethered Enone8
The mechanism of Pd(II) complex catalyzed aza-Michael
reactions may involve enone activation by either a Pd(II)
species11,13 or a proton resulting from hydrolysis of the
transition-metal complex.17 Indeed, strong Brønsted acids
are known to catalyze aza-Michael reactions and are superior
to Pd(II) complexes in some cases.18 Prior to testing chiral
Brønsted acids (thioureas,19 chiral phosphoric acids,20 and
chiral N-triflylphosphoramides21) (Scheme 2A), we per-
formed a control experiment using triflic acid (TfOH). To
our surprise, a catalytic amount of TfOH (0.1 equiv) in
DCM provided 2a in 93% yield in 15 min with reversed
diastereoselectivity (cis/trans 15:85) (Scheme 2B) in relation
to Pd(II) catalysis (cis/trans 93:7). Lowering the tempera-
ture to ꢀ20 °C resulted in improved diastereoselectivity (cis/
trans 9:91) (Scheme 2C). Thus, different achiral catalysts
Our investigation started from the Cbz carbamate-
tethered enone 1a, which was easily prepared from
(3) For recent reviews on asymmetric aza-Michael reactions, see: (a)
Xu, L.-W.; Xia, C.-G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 633. (b) Enders, D.;
Wang, C.; Liebich, J. X. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 11058. For β-amino
acid synthesis, see: (a) Enantioselective Synthesis of β-Amino Acids;
Juaristi, E., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1997. (b) Liu, M.; Sibi, M. P.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7991. For related natural product related reviews,
see: (a) Cardillo, G.; Tomassini, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996, 117.
(4) For recent organocatalysis examples, see: (a) Chen, Y. K.;
Yoshida, M.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
9328. (b) Lu, X.; Deng, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7710. (c)
Cai, Q.; Zheng, C.; You, S.-L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8666.
For recent examples of transition-metal catalysis, see: (d) Myers, J. K.;
Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8959. (e) Palomo, C.;
(11) Gaunt, M. J.; Spencer, J. B. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 25.
(12) Kobayashi, S.; Kakumoto, K.; Sugiura, M. Org. Lett. 2002, 3,
1319.
ꢀ
Oiarbide, M.; Halder, R.; Kelso, M.; Gomez-Bengoa, E.; Garcıa, J. M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9188.
(13) (a) Reiter, M.; Turner, H.; Gouverneur, V. Chem.;Eur. J. 2006,
12, 7190. (b) Ozawa, F.; Yoshifuji, M. Dalton Trans. 2006, 4987.
(14) (a) Miyashita, A.; Yasuda, A.; Takaya, H.; Toriumi, K.; Ito, T.;
Souchi, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7932. (b) Trost,
B. M.; Fandrick, D. R.; Dinh, D. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14186.
(15) For a review, see: Ghosh, A. K.; Mathivanan, P.; Cappiello, J.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1.
(16) For example, see: Mukherjee, S.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 11336.
(17) Wabnitz, T. C.; Yu, J. Q.; Spencer, J. B. Chem.;Eur. J. 2004, 10,
484.
(5) (a) Takasu, K.; Maiti, S.; Ihara, M. Heterocycles 2003, 59, 51. (b)
Bandini, M.; Eichholzer, A.; Tragni, M.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3238. (c) Rolfe, A.; Young, K.; Hanson, P. R.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 5254.
(6) For the most recent example, see: Ying, Y.; Kim, H.; Hong, J.
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 796.
(7) For review, see: Masamune, S.; Choy, W.; Petersen, J. S.; Sita,
L. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1985, 24, 1.
(8) See the Supporting Information for more detailed screening.
(9) See the Supporting Information for detailed syntheses of all the
substrates.
(18) Wabnitz, T. C.; Spencer, J. B. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2141.
(19) (a) Xu, H.; Zuend, S. J.; Woll, M. G.; Tao, Y.; Jacobsen, E. N.
Science 2010, 327, 986.
(20) Garcia-Garcia, P.; Lay, F.; Rabalakos, C.; List, B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4363.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(10) For BF3 OEt2 catalysis, see: Fustero, S.; Jimenez, D.; Sanchez-
3
ꢀ
Rosello, M.; del Pozo, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6700. For
ꢀ
ꢀ
prolinol silylether catalysis, see: Fustero, S.; Jimenez, D.; Moscardo, J.;
ꢀ
Catalan, S.; del Pozo, C. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5283. For basic conditions,
see:Sudhakar, N.; Srinivasulu, G.; Rao, G. S.; Rao., B. V. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2008, 19, 2153.
(21) Cheon, C. H.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9246.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 20, 2011
5557