may correspond to absorption arising from asymmetrical C–H
stretching of methyl groups in pentane (see ESIw). Fig. 2 shows
a series of 13C CPMAS solid-state NMR spectra correspond-
ing to Phase I, Phase II and the re-solvated Phase I. The
symmetry changes caused by solvent removal and uptake are
clearly demonstrated as two (150.0 and 150.5 ppm) and four
(148.4, 150.3, 151.1 and 152.0 ppm) inequivalent CO sites are
observed for Phase I and Phase II, respectively, in agreement
with single-crystal XRD. Chemical shifts for CO sites are
slightly different (150.2 and 150.5 ppm) in the re-solvated
phase compared to the starting material and some other slight
chemical shift differences are observed, but the re-solvated
phase exhibits essentially the same spectrum as Phase I. These
shifts are certainly induced by a different pore occupation due
to a higher CH2Cl2 proportion in the re-solvated phase than in
the starting material as evidenced in the top part of Fig. 2 and
pentane molecules and channels half-filled with dichloromethane
was computed and found to be strongly stabilizing (ꢁ40 kJ molꢁ1).
Finally, the interaction energy involving dichloromethane
molecules and channels half-filled with pentane was also computed
and found to be less stabilizing (ꢁ14 kJ molꢁ1). It follows
from this energy analysis that the only way to be competitive
with the strong intramolecular H-bond (ꢁ50 kJ molꢁ1) in
Phase II is to fill the channels first with dichloromethane and
then encapsulate pentane molecules (ꢁ40 ꢁ 32 = ꢁ72 kJ molꢁ1
)
while filling first with pentane and then encapsulate dichloro-
methane is much less favorable (ꢁ14 ꢁ 32 = ꢁ46 kJ molꢁ1).
These oligophenylene structures being light emitters,12 solid-
state fluorescent measurements were also performed both on the
solvated and compact state of the material. It was thus found
that upon excitation at 340 nm, both phases exhibited luminescence
centered at lmax = 400 nm.
In conclusion, we were able to characterize a dynamic behavior
of an organic crystalline solid. This dynamic phenomenon corres-
ponds to the reversible guest-induced crystal-to-crystal conversion
of a solvated to a compact phase. From a quantitative energy
analysis it was found that the presence of both dichloromethane
and pentane molecules within the channels was necessary for the
occurrence of the reversible Phase II to Phase I transition.
We are indebted to Dr Kyritsakas for X-ray structure resolu-
tion. We thank Prof. Mir Wais Hosseini for fruitful discussions.
1
in H MAS spectra (see ESIw).
In order to better characterize the role of solvent molecules
in the formation of Phase I and Phase II, we have used the
PACHA (Partial Atomic Charges Analysis) approach that
allows us to compute reliable interaction energies from the sole
knowledge of crystalline structures (see ESIw for computational
details).9,10 Concerning Phase I, the intermolecular H-bond energy
responsible for H-bonded chains of http molecules was found to
be ꢁ22 kJ molꢁ1, a value that may be compared to the energy
associated by the stacking of these chains into a 3D structure
of about ꢁ1 kJ molꢁ1. The 1D nature of Phase I is thus clearly
established. Concerning Phase II, molecular interactions
between http1 molecules in the absence of http2 were found
to be slightly destabilizing (+1 kJ molꢁ1) whereas molecular
interactions between http2 molecules in the absence of http1
molecules were found to be slightly stabilizing (ꢁ3 kJ molꢁ1).
Interweaving these two sub-networks was neatly stabilizing
with an interaction energy of ꢁ12 kJ molꢁ1. The inter-
molecular H-bond energy for H-bonded chains of http mole-
cules was found to be ꢁ26 kJ molꢁ1, whereas the energy
associated with the intramolecular H-bonds was about twice
This work was done at Universite de Strasbourg with public
´
funds allocated by CNRS and the French government.
Notes and references
1 S. C. Zimmerman, Science, 1997, 276, 543; G. R. Desiraju, Com-
prehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, ed. J. L. Atwood, J. E. D.
Davies, D. D. MacNicol and F. Vogtle, Elsevier Science, Oxford,
¨
1996, vol. 6.
´
2 G. Ferey and C. Serre, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1380;
S. Kitagawa and K. Uemura, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34, 109.
3 For selected examples see: D. Bradshaw, J. E. Warren and
M. J. Rosseinsky, Science, 2007, 315, 977; C. Serre, C. Mellot-
Draznieks, S. Surble, N. Audebrand, Y. Filinchunk and G. Ferey,
´
Science, 2007, 315, 1828; S. Horike, S. Shimomura and
S. Kitagawa, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 695.
this value at ꢁ50 kJ molꢁ1
.
In order to get a good understanding of the role played
by solvent molecules, atomic coordinates were computed for
dichloromethane and pentane molecules encapsulated within the
network channel after minimization of steric energy using
Gordin–Kim potentials.11 Assuming a 1 : 1 host : guest ratio
(1 : 0.8 measured) and channels entirely filled with dichloro-
methane, 1D chains of dichloromethane molecules (halogen bond
energy of ꢁ18 kJ molꢁ1) were obtained with an encapsulating
energy of ꢁ26 kJ molꢁ1. By contrast, for channels entirely filled
with pentane, interactions between pentane molecules or with
channels walls were found to be both rather weak (ꢁ0.3 kJ molꢁ1
and ꢁ1 kJ molꢁ1 respectively). In both cases there is clearly not
enough energy to overcome the strong intramolecular H-bond
observed in Phase II. Consequently, a network with channels
filled with a 50 : 50 dichloromethane : pentane ratio (measured
70 : 30) was generated. The average interaction energy between
the solvent molecules was found to be very stabilizing at
ꢁ32 kJ molꢁ1 while the average interaction energy with channels
walls was found to be less stabilizing at ꢁ11 kJ molꢁ1. The sum
of both interactions (ꢁ43 kJ molꢁ1) being still lower than the
intramolecular H-bond energy, the interaction energy involving
4 J. T. A. Jones, D. Holden, T. Mitra, T. Hasell, D. J. Adams,
K. E. Jelfs, A. Trewin, D. J. Willock, G. M. Day, J. Basca,
A. Steiner and A. I. Cooper, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 749.
5 S. J. Dalgarno, P. K. Thallapally, L. J. Bardour and J. L. Atwood,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 236; P. Sozzani, S. Bracco, A. Comotti,
L. Ferretti and R. Simonutti, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 1816.
6 In some case the porosity is maintained in organic solids upon loss
of solvates trapped into cavities, see: J. R. Holst, A. Trewin and
A. I. Cooper, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 915.
7 D. D. MacNicol, J. J. McKendrick and D. R. Wilson, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 1978, 7, 65; M. Miyata, M. Shibakami, S. Chirachanchai,
K. Takemoto, N. Kasai and K. Miki, Nature, 1990, 343, 446;
A. T. Ung, D. Gizachew, R. Bishop, M. L. Scudder, I. G. Dance
and D. C. Craig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 117, 8745; T. Dewa,
K. Endo and Y. Aoyama, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 8933;
S. J. Dalgarno, P. K. Thallapally, L. J. Barbour and J. L. Atwood,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 236; A. Comotti, S. Bracco,
G. Distefano and P. Sozzani, Chem. Commun., 2009, 284.
8 A. L. Spek, PLATON, A Multipurpose Crystallographic Tool,
Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.
9 M. Henry, ChemPhysChem, 2002, 3, 561–569.
10 M. Henry, in Advances in Quantum Chemical Bonding Structures,
ed. Mihai V. Putz, Transworld Research Network, Kerala, India,
2008, pp. 153–211.
11 M. A. Spackman, J. Chem. Phys., 1986, 85, 6579.
12 I. B. J. Berlman, Chem. Phys., 1970, 52, 5616.
c
9632 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 9630–9632
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011