COMMUNICATION
3-DFPCz and 4-DFPCz were À2.45 eV, À2.48 eV and
À2.40 eV, respectively. Energy levels of host materials are
summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Energy levels of the host materials.
Material
HOMO
[eV][a]
LUMO
[eV][b]
Band gap
[eV][c]
Triplet energy
[eV][d]
2-DFPCz
3-DFPCz
4-DFPCz
À5.90
À5.98
À5.85
À2.45
À2.48
À2.40
3.45
3.50
3.45
2.89
2.59
2.79
[a] The HOMO was measured by a surface analyzer. [b] The LUMO was
calculated from the difference between the HOMO and the band gap.
[c] The band gap was calculated from the absorption edge of the UV/Vis
spectra. [d] The triplet energy was calculated from the first emission peak
position of the low-temperature PL spectra.
Figure 1. HOMO and LUMO distributions of 3-DFPCz and 4-DFPCz.
tion.[10] Figure 1 shows the HOMO and LUMO distribution
of host materials. Phenylcarbazole plays a role of hole trans-
port unit owing to the electron-donating character of the
carbazole moiety,[11] while dibenzofuran acts as an electron-
transport unit owing to the electron-withdrawing property
of oxygen. Therefore, the HOMO was dispersed over carba-
zole unit, whereas the LUMO was localized on dibenzofu-
The photophysical properties of the three host materials
were analyzed using UV/Vis and photoluminescence (PL)
spectroscopy. UV/Vis spectra were obtained from vacuum-
deposited thin films of the host materials. Figure 2 shows
UV/Vis and PL spectra of the host materials, which exhibit-
ed typical UV/Vis absorption of phenylcarbazole and diben-
zofuran. The optical band gap was calculated from the ab-
sorption edge of UV/Vis spectra. 2-DFPCz, 3-DFPCz and 4-
DFPCz showed optical band gaps of 3.45 eV, 3.50 eV and
3.45 eV, respectively. There was little difference of optical
band gaps between three host materials in solid state. Triplet
energies calculated from peak position of the first emission
peak of low-temperature PL spectra were 2.89 eV, 2.59 eV
and 2.79 eV, for 2-DFPCz, 3-DFPCz and 4-DFPCz, respec-
tively. The triplet energy was low in 3-DFPCz because of ex-
tended conjugation through the para-substituted phenyl
group. In the case of 2-DFPCz and 4-DFPCz, meta substitu-
tion of the phenyl group suppressed the extension of conju-
gation, leading to a high triplet energy. In particular, 2-sub-
stitution was effective in raising the triplet energy of host
materials. The triplet energy of the host materials was rather
low compared with other dibenzofuran derivatives with di-
phenylphosphine oxide owing to the phenyl linkage and car-
bazole unit.
ACHTUNGTRENNUNGran unit. The HOMO distribution was similar, and there was
little difference of simulated HOMO levels between host
materials. However, the simulated LUMO level was differ-
ent depending on the substitution position. The LUMO was
distributed only on dibenzofuran in 2-DFPCz, as reported in
other work[9] (Supporting Information), while the LUMO
was extended to a phenyl unit of phenylcarbazole of 3-
DFPCz and 4-DFPCz. The extension of the LUMO orbital
stabilized the LUMO level of 3-DFPCz and 4-DFPCz. The
simulated LUMO levels of 3-DFPCz and 4-DFPCz were
À1.34 eV and À1.27 eV, respectively, compared with
À1.09 eV of 2-DFPCz.
The HOMO level of the three host materials were mea-
ACHTUNGTRENNUNGsured by a surface analyzer using vacuum-deposited thin
films. The HOMO levels of 2-DFPCz, 3-DFPCz and 4-
DFPCz were À5.90 eV, À5.98 eV and À5.85 eV, respectively.
The LUMO level was calculated from the HOMO level and
the optical band gap from UV/Vis spectra of thermally
evaporated thin filmsACTHNUGRTENUNG(Figure 2). LUMO levels of 2-DFPCz,
Hole-only and electron-only devices of three host materi-
als were fabricated to study the effect of substitution posi-
tion on the hole and electron transport properties of the
host materials. Figure 3 shows current-density–voltage
curves of hole- and electron-only devices. The hole current
density of hole-only devices was similar in all three devices,
while the electron current density of electron-only devices
was high in 3-DFPCz and 4-DFPCz. This can be explained
by the HOMO and LUMO distribution of host materials.
There was little difference of HOMO distribution between
host materials, leading to similar hole transport properties in
all three host materials. However, the LUMO distribution
was different depending on the substitution position of di-
benzofuran. 3-DFPCz and 4-DFPCz with a widely dispersed
LUMO showed high electron current density, but 2-DFPCz
with a localized LUMO distribution exhibited low electron
current density. The dominant electron transport mechanism
&
^ ^
, ) and low-
, ) of 3-DFPCz (filled symbols) and 4-DFPCz
Figure 2. UV/Vis ( ,&), solution photoluminescence (PL;
~ ~
temperature PL spectra (
(open symbols).
Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 1194 – 1198
ꢁ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1195