R. G. Kalkhambkar et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 5184–5187
5187
N
N
OH
OH
F3CO2S
F3CO2S
N
H
N
R
R
SO2CF3
OTf
N
O
N
O
N
N
N
H
SO2CF3
SO2CF3
N
NaH, C2H4Cl2
imidazole
or TEA
or DBU
F3CO2S
R
R
4
3
3
NaH
MeI
C2H4Cl2
SO2CF3
N
OTf
N
F3CO2S
5
Scheme 5. Exploring adduct formation from 4.
3. Kim, H. S.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, J. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1717.
4. Anand, N.; Owston, N. A.; Parker, A. J.; Slatford, P. A.; Williams, J. M. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7761.
5. Li, D.; Shi, F.; Guo, S.; Deng, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 671.
6. Sardarian, A. R.; Shahsavari-Fard, Z.; Shahsavari, H. R.; Ebrahimi, Z. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2007, 48, 2639.
F3CO2S
F3CO2S
N
H
N
N
O
N
O
N
N
Me
SO2CF3
SO2CF3
NaH
DCM 40-50 o
H3C
I
R
R
7. Sharghi, H. M.; Sarvari, H. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 10323.
8. Jiang, N. A.; Ragauskas, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 4479.
C
9. Li, Z.; Ding, R.; Lu, Z.; Xiao, S.; MaZheng, X. M. J. Mol. Catal A: Chem. 2006, 250,
100.
10. Kato, Y.; Ooi, R.; Kato, Y. A. J. Mol. Catal B: Enzym. 1999, 6, 249.
11. Khezri, S. H.; Azimi, N.; Mohammed-Vali, M.; Eftekhari-Sis, B. M.; Hashemi, M.;
Baniasadi, M. H.; Khezri, F. T. H. Arkivoc 2007, 15, 162.
(3b-d)
R = 2-OMe, 3-CF3, 2-Me-5-F
Scheme 6. Synthesis of methylated adducts (6b–d).
(6b-d)
12. Moussa, Z.; Ahmed, S. A.; ElDouhaibi, S.; Al-Raqa, S. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010,
51, 1826.
13. Saha, D.; Saha, A.; Ranu, B. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6088.
14. Luca, L. D.; Giacomelli, G.; Porcheddu, A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6272.
15. Singh, M. K.; Lakshman, M. K. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3079.
16. Effenberger, F.; Mack, K. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 3947.
sensitive to steric affects, since R groups larger than CH3 could not
be installed by this method.
17. General procedure for synthesis of nitriles from oximes (1–16): A mixture of
aldoximes (1 mmol) and imidazole (3 mmol) in anhydrous DCM (10–15 mL)
was charged into an oven-dried round-bottom flask under nitrogen and the
reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 20 min, after which triflic anhydride
(0.4–1.0 mmol) was added dropwise via syringe under nitrogen, and the
reaction mixture was allowed to stir at r.t. for a specific time (Table 1). Progress
of the reaction was monitored by TLC and/or by GC–MS. Upon completion, the
reaction mixture was quenched with dilute NaHCO3 solution and the product
mass was extracted in DCM. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure
to yield the crude product which was purified by prep TLC (ethyl acetate–
hexane mixture) (80:20), to give the corresponding nitrile (61–88% yield). The
structure of the products was confirmed by comparison of their mp or bp, TLC,
IR, GC–MS, 1H NMR and 13C NMR data with authentic samples obtained
commercially or prepared by literature methods.
Acknowledgments
We thank University of North Florida for support of this re-
search and Dr. Nelson Zhao for NMR assistance. We also thank a
referee for helpful remarks concerning the suggested mechanism.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (X-ray data collection parameters, (exclud-
ing structure factors) for the structures have been deposited with
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary
publication No. CCDC 822706. Copies of the data can be obtained,
CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: +44 (0)1223
336033; or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk) associated with this
article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/
General procedure for the synthesis of adducts (3a–d): A mixture of aldoximes
(2a–d) (1 mmol) and imidazole (3 mmol) was added to anhydrous DCM (10–
15 mL) in an oven-dried round bottom flask under nitrogen and stirred at r.t.
for 20 min. Triflic anhydride (0.4–1 mmol) was then introduced dropwise via
syringe under nitrogen and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir at r.t.
overnight. The progress of reaction was monitored by TLC and by GC–MS. Upon
completion the reaction mixture was quenched with dilute NaHCO3 solution,
and the product mass was extracted in DCM, removal of solvent gave the crude
product, which was purified by Prep-TLC (ethyl acetate–hexane mixture)
(80:20) and column chromatography (ethyl acetate–hexane mixture) (80:20)
to give the corresponding adducts (65–90% yield), whose structures were
confirmed by NMR (1H, 13C and HMQC; see below), and by X-ray analysis in the
case of 3c. GC–MS analysis of adducts 3 consistently exhibited an intense m/z
333 ion corresponding to the bis(N-triflyl)imidazolium cation, and the intact
molecular ions were not detected even at 20 eV.
References and notes
1. (a) North, M. In Katritzky, A. R., Meth-Cohn, O., Rees, C. W., Pattenden, G., Eds.;
Comprehensive Organic Functional Group Transformations; Pergamon: Oxford,
1995; Vol. 3, (b) Friedrich, K.; Wallenfels, K. In The Chemistry of the Cyano
Group; Rappaport, Z., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1970; (c) Miller, J. S.;
Manson, J. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 563; (d) Larock, R. C. Comprehensive
Organic Transformations, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1999; (e) Fatiadi, A. J. In
Preparation and Synthetic Applications of Cyano Compounds; Patai, S., Rappaport,
Z., Eds., 1983. New York; (f) Ellis, G. P.; Romney-Alexander, T. M. Chem. Rev.
1987, 87, 779; (g) Raja, R.; Adams, R. D.; Blom, D. A.; Pearl, W. C.; Gianotti, E.;
Thomas, J. M. Langmuir 2009, 25, 7200.
18. Soltani Rad, M. N.; Khalafi-Nezhad, A.; Behrouz, S.; Amini, Z.; Behrouz, M.
Synth. Commun. 2010, 40, 2429.
19. (a) Shelke, K. F.; Sapkal, S. B.; Shitole, N. V.; Shingate, B. B.; Shingare, M. S. Org.
Commun. 2009, 2, 72; (b) Dubrovskiy, A. V.; Larock, R. C. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
1180; (c) Iranpoor, N.; Firouzabadi, H.; Nasser, N. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
8247.
20. Dumrath, A.; Wu, X. F.; Neumann, H.; Spannenberg, A.; Jackstell, R.; Beller, M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8988.
2. Yadav, L. D. S.; Srivastava, V. P.; Yadav, R. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 5532.