amination. The galactosyl triazine was attached onto the R1-amine
functionalized resin under mild heating. The other dimension
of diversity was introduced by parallel substitution of the third
chloride on the triazine scaffold. Each R1-amine-triazine resin was
divided into ten equal portions and reacted with ten amines (Table
1, entry 1–10) under elevated temperature. The final products
were cleaved from the solid support by mild acidic conditions.
In total, 80 compounds were prepared by this orthogonal solid-
phase synthesis.
This method is suitable for the rapid preparation of large
collections of 1,3,5-triazine-based nucleoside analogues without
extensive reaction conditions or steps or tedious purification, and
is not only limited to galactose. The current set of compound
will be tested in cell-based biological activity assays, as well as in
a Caco-2 cell-based transportation study.10 This method is being
applied to other carbohydrate building blocks and a larger 1,3,5-
triazine nucleoside library is in preparation.
The amine building blocks were carefully chosen from common
pharmacophore fragments based on Lipinski’s rule-of-five.9 Since
the molecular weight of galactosyl triazine is around 260 Da,
the combined molecular weight of the corresponding R1 and R2
amines was controlled around 240 Da. As there are already three
hydrogen bonding receptors on triazine scaffold, the number of
hydrogen bonding receptors on amine substituents was limited.
The number of additional hydrogen bonding donors in the
substituents was limited by the 2 donors already present on the
scaffold. The building blocks represent a broad range of structural
diversity, from acyclic to cyclic and polycyclic, and from aliphatic
to aromatic. Furthermore, it was ensured that the building blocks
had only one reactive amine group in each structure to confirm
the identity of the products.
The cleavage of final product from the resin was carried out
by 10% TFA in dichloromethane for only 5 min to ensure the
isopropylidene protecting groups were left intact. Removal of these
protecting groups will expose 4 free hydroxy groups, significantly
decrease the log P and might lower the cellular uptake. On the
other hand, the removal of acid-labile isopropylidene group might
be accomplished in the cytosol, especially in lysozome. Thus, we
decided to keep the current “prodrug-” like protected form.
While it is generally difficult to prepare nucleoside analogues
with high purity before purification, compounds prepared using
this method exhibited purities ranging from 75 to 99%, with
an average of 92%. Thus, they could be used in the biological
screenings directly without further purification. It is also worth
noting that the high purity of the final products justifies that the
triazinyl ether bond between galactose and triazine is stable under
harsh basic conditions.
Notes and references
1 Some recent examples: (a) H. S. Moon, E. M. Jacobson, S. M.
Khersonsky, M. R. Luzung, D. P. Walsh, W. Xiong, J. W. Lee, P. B.
Parikh, J. C. Lam, T. W. Kang, G. R. Rosania, A. F. Schier and Y.
T. Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 11608; (b) D. Williams, D.
W. Jung, S. M. Khersonsky, N. Heidary, Y. T. Chang and S. J. Orlow,
Chem. Biol., 2004, 11, 1251; (c) J. K. Min, Y. K. Kim, P. G. Cipriani,
M. Kang, S. M. Khersonsky, D. P. Walsh, J. Y. Lee, S. Niessen, J. R.
Yates, K. Gunsalus, F. Piano and Y. T. Chang, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2007,
3, 55.
2 (a) Z. Guo, D. Wu, Y. F. Zhu, F. C. Tucci, J. Pontillo, J. Saunders, Q.
Xie, R. S. Struthers and C. Chen, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2005, 15,
693; (b) G. Balboni, I. Lazzari, C. Trapella, L. Negri, R. Lattanzi, E.
Giannini, A. Nicotra, P. Melchiorri, S. Visentin, C. De Nuccio and
S. Salvadori, J. Med. Chem., 2008, 51, 7635; (c) M. Krecmerova´, A.
Holy´, A. P´ıskala, M. Masoj´ıdkova´, G. Andrei, L. Naesens, J. Neyts, J.
Balzarini, E. De Clercq and R. Snoeck, J. Med. Chem., 2007, 50, 1069.
3 M. A. Kamrin, Pesticide profiles: toxicity, environmental impact, and
fate, CRC Press, 1997.
4 (a) P. H. Seeberger and D. B. Werz, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery, 2005, 4,
751–63; (b) H. Schugar, D. E. Green, M. L. Bowen, L. E. Scott, T. Storr,
K. Bo¨hmerle, F. Thomas, D. D. Allen, P. R. Lockman, M. Merkel, K.
H. Thompson and C. Orvig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 1549.
5 (a) C. V. Varaprasad, Q. Habib, D. Y. Li, J. Huang, J. W. Abt, F. Rong,
Z. Hong and H. An, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 2297–2307; (b) S. Ronchi,
D. Prosperi, F. Compostella and L. Panza, Synlett, 2004, 1007–1010;
(c) M. J. Adam and L. D. Hall, Carbohydr. Res., 1979, 68, C17.
6 (a) K. O. A. Yu, J. S. Im, A. Molano, Y. Dutronc, P. A. Illarionov, C.
Forestier, N. Fujiwara, I. Arias, S. Miyake, T. Yamamura, Y. T. Chang,
G. S. Besra and S. A. Porcelli, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2005, 102,
3383–3388; (b) M. A. Robinson, S. T. Charlton, P. Garnier, X. Wang, S.
S. Davis, A. C. Perkins, M. Frier, R. Duncan, T. J. Savage, D. A. Wyatt,
S. A. Watson and B. G. Davis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2004,
101, 14527–32.
7 M. J. Boyera and I. F. Tannock, Adv. Cancer Res., 1992, 60, 269–291.
8 The log P was calculated by the XLOGP3 method. T. Cheng, Y. Zhao,
X. Li, F. Lin, Y. Xu, X. Zhang, Y. Li, R. Wang and L. Lai, J. Chem.
Inf. Model., 2007, 47, 2140–2148.
9 C. A. Lipinski, Drug Discovery Today, 2003, 8, 12–16.
10 S. Yee, Pharm. Res., 1997, 14, 763–766.
In conclusion, herein we report a methodology for the combina-
torial solid phase synthesis of 1,3,5-triazine nucleoside analogues.
6926 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 6924–6926
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©