9 was converted to the corresponding N-monomethyla-
mine 10 by a convenient one-pot procedure reported by
Suzuki and co-workers.14 At this stage, conformational
change, in which the typical 4C1 conformation flipped to
Table 1. Stereo- and Regioselective Glycosylation of 4 with 5
1
the less common C4 conformation, was confirmed by
NOESY correlation between H-1 and H-5. This phenom-
enon was previously reported by Matsuda and Shuto when
bulky and robust tert-butyldimethylsilyl protecting groups
were installed at the C-3 and C-4 positions of xylopyrano-
side derivatives.15 The undesired amino sugar 11, which
was produced along with 10, could be converted to the N-
monomethylamino sugar 10 via reductive amination in
75% yield. The N-methylamino group was protected as a
trichloroethoxycarbamate, and subsequent deprotection
of the DEIPS groups gave the glycosyl acceptor 4. Mean-
while, glycosyl donor 5 was prepared from methyl R-D-
glucopyranoside (12), as shown in Scheme 2. The known
methylglycoside13was synthesizedin six steps, referring to
Baer’s methodology.16 The N-methylamino group of 13
was protected by a Troc group, and subsequent hydrolysis
and acetylation gave the glycosyl donor 5.
yield (%)
entry
activator
solvent temp (°C) 15β 15r 16β
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TMSOTf (0.3 equiv)
TMSOTf (0.3 equiv)
TMSOTf (0.3 equiv)
TMSOTf (0.3 equiv)
TMSOTf (0.3 equiv)
TMSOTf (0.3 equiv)
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
MeCN
Et2O
ꢀ60
ꢀ40
ꢀ20
ꢀ40
ꢀ40
ꢀ40
ꢀ40
ꢀ20
31 58
6
20
17
69
66
9
7
29 54 12
10 70
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Glycosyl Donor 5
toluene
67 13
42 35
9
9
BF3 OEt2 (1.5 equiv) CH2Cl2
3
3
BF3 OEt2, (1.5 equiv) CH2Cl2
68 13 17
hindranceatthe C-4position. However, the pyranosechair
flip, which induces remote participation, did not take place
effectively at ꢀ60 °C; therefore, the reaction was also
examined at ꢀ40 and ꢀ20 °C. The β-selectivity of dis-
accharide 15 was dramatically improved, as expected, and
the desired disaccharide 15β was obtained in 69 and 66%
yields, respectively(entries 2 and 3). Next, the solvent effect
on the glycosylation reaction was investigated using
MeCN, Et2O, and toluene at ꢀ40 °C.
With both glycosyl acceptor 4 and donor 5 in hand, we
examined the glycosylation reaction under various condi-
tions to investigate how the N-Troc group at the C-4
position of 5 affected the stereoselectivity of the reaction.
The results are summarized in Table 1. It was found that
glycosylation of 4 (1.5 equiv) with 5 (1.0 equiv) in the
Interestingly, when a polar solvent, MeCN or Et2O, was
used, the stereoselectivity of 15was found to changefrom β
to R, and 15r was obtained as the major product (entries 4
and 5); in contrast, when an apolar solvent, CH2Cl2 or
toluene, was used, the desired 15β was obtained as the
major product (entries 2 and 6). These results suggested
that polar solvents that can coordinate to an oxocarbe-
nium intermediate prevented conformational change
of the pyranose ring and remote participation of the
N-Troc group at the C-4 position, leading to decreased
β-selectivity.
˚
presence of TMSOTf (0.3 equiv) and 5 A molecular sieves
(100 wt % with respect to 5) in CH2Cl2 at ꢀ60 °C
proceeded smoothly to provide the desired β-(1,4)-linked
deoxyglycoside 15β, the R-(1,4)-linked deoxyglycoside
15r, and the β-(1,3)-linked deoxyglycoside 16β in yields
of 31, 58, and 6%, respectively, with excellent regioselec-
tivity and poor stereoselectivity (entry 1). The configura-
tion of the anomeric positions of 15 and 16 was clearly
confirmed by the corresponding amino products which
were obtained after deprotection of the Troc groups. The
high regioselectivity was, presumably, due to low steric
In order to determine whether the major factor control-
ling β-selectivity was the remote participation effect of the
N-Troc group at the C-4 or the formation of a glycosyl R-
triflate intermediate,17 we performed the glycosylation
reaction using BF3 OEt2 (1.5 equiv) instead of TMSOTf
3
as an activator in CH2Cl2 at ꢀ40 and ꢀ20 °C (entries 7 and
8). Although the glycosylation reaction at ꢀ40 °C afforded
the desired disaccharide 15 in high yield with low β-
selectivity, the β-selectivity was found to be improved by
(14) Kato, H.; Ohmori, K.; Suzuki, K. Synlett 2001, 1003.
(15) (a) Abe, H.; Shuto, S.; Matsuda, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
11870. (b) Yamada, H.; Nakatani, M.; Ikeda, T.; Marumoto, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 5573. (c) Hosoya, T.; Ohashi, Y.; Matsumoto,
T.; Suzuki, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 663.
(16) Baer, H. H.; Hanna, Z. S. Carbohydr. Res. 1981, 94, 43.
(17) Crich, D.; Sun, S. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4506.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 22, 2011
6128