K. Arai et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 6285–6287
6287
In conclusion, we have synthesized and analyzed the properties
of oligoribonucleotides bearing a novel 20-O-modification with alk-
oxymethyl skeletons. Hybridization affinity of the oligoribonucleo-
tides with electron-withdrawing substituted 20-O-alkoxymethyl
groups was higher than that of unmodified 20-O-EOM oligoribonu-
cleotides. The increases in Tm value were especially high in the
20-O-MCEM and 20-O-DCEM substitutions, in which the duplex
stabilizing effect was specific to RNA. Nuclease resistance of the
20-O-alkoxymethylated oligoribonucleotides, except for the 20-O-
CEM-substitutedoligoribonucleotides, was unexpectedly lower
than that of 20-O-methylated oligoribonucleotides. Further investi-
gation of the substitution and synthesis of oligoribonucleotides
bearing other nucleobases are in progress.
Figure 4. Relative nuclease resistance of oligoribonucleotides with 20-Omodifica-
a
tions. Sequence: 50-U⁄U⁄U⁄U⁄U⁄U⁄U⁄U⁄U⁄U⁄U⁄U-30. bProcedure: 10
lM oligori-
Acknowledgments
bonucleotides were digested with snake venom phosphodiesterase (4 ꢁ 10ꢀ4 units/
ml) for 2 h in 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.5), 72 mM NaCl and 14 mM MgCl2.
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Re-
search on Innovative Areas (21115008).
contrast to the observed effect of the 20-O-methyl modification,
which demonstrated high affinity to the complementary strand in
both RNA and DNA (Figs. 2 and 3). From these results, it could be
stated that the 20-O-MCEM or 20-O-DCEM modification stabilizes
the duplex in a manner different from that of the 20-O-methyl
modification.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
Nuclease resistance of the 20-O-modified oligoribonucleo-tides
was tested by using snake venom phosphodiesterase (SVPD)
( Fig. 4). Oligoribonucleotides were treated with the nuclease for
2 h and the degradation ratio was estimated by reversed phase HPLC
analysis. Surprisingly, most of the oligoribonucleotides with 20-O-
alkoxy-methyl modifications were less resistant to the nuclease
than the oligoribonucleotides with 20-O-methyl modification,
although the former groups are bulkier than the methyl group. It is
also noteworthy that the degradation ratio increased when addi-
tional halogen atoms were substituted, except for the 20-O-TCEM
group. This result suggests that the introduction of halogen atoms,
especially chlorine atoms, could lead to the reduction of nuclease
resistance. In previous studies12,13, benzyl groups reduced nuclease
resistance when introduced into the 20-position. From these results,
it was implied that hydrophobic substitutions could possibly cause a
reduction in nuclease resistance. In contrast, 20-O-CEM-substituted
oligoribonucleotides demonstrated higher nuclease resistance than
the 20-O-methyl oligoribonucleotides. A similar improvement in
nuclease resistance was observed in the 20-O-cyanoethyl modifica-
tion4, which suggests that the introduction of the cyano group into
the 20-modification could lead to a higher nuclease resistance.
1. Inoue, H.; Hyase, Y.; Imura, A.; Iwai, S.; Miura, K.; Ohtsuka, E. Nucleic Acid Res.
1987, 15, 6131.
2. Martin, P. Helv. Chim. Acta 1995, 78, 486.
3. Griffey, R. H.; Monia, B. P.; Cummins, L. L.; Freier, A. S.; Greig, M. J.; Guinosso, C.
J.; Lesnik, E.; Manalili, S. M.; Mohan, V.; Owens, S.; Ross, B. R.; Sasmor, H.;
Wancewicz, E.; Weiler, K.; Wheeler, P. D.; Cook, P. D. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39,
5100.
4. Saneyoshi, H.; Seio, K.; Sekine, M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10453.
5. Ohgi, T.; Matsutomi, Y.; Ishiyama, K.; Kitagawa, H.; Shiba, Y.; Yano, J. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 3477.
6. Shiba, Y.; Masuda, H.; Watanabe, N.; Ego, T.; Takagaki, K.; Ishiyama, K.; Ohgi, T.;
Yano, J. Nucl. Acid Res. 2007, 35, 3287.
7. Zhou, C.; Honcharenko, D.; Chattopadhyaya, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 333.
8. Cieslak, J.; Kauffmann, J. S.; Kolodziejski, M. J.; Lloyd, J. R.; Beaucage, S. L. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 671.
9. Tereshko, V.; Portmann, S.; Tay, E. C.; Martin, P.; Natt, F.; Altmann, K. H.; Egli, M.
Biochemistry 1998, 37, 10626.
10. Wu, X.; Pitsch, S. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 1127.
11. Bobkov, G. V.; Mikhailov, S. N.; Aerschot, A. V.; Herdewijn, P. Tetrahedron 2008,
64, 6238.
12. Egli, M.; Minasov, G.; Tereshko, V.; Pallan, P. S.; Teploya, M.; Inamati, G. B.;
Lesnik, E. A.; Owens, S. R.; Ross, B. S.; Prakash, T.; Manoharan, M. Biochemistry
2005, 44, 9045.
13. Rahman, S. M.; Seki, S.; Obika, S.; Yoshikawa, H.; Miyashita, K.; Imanishi, T. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4886.