A. Huo et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 6242–6244
6243
Ο
Ο
a
N
O
N
O
NH
N
Ο
1
O
Ο
O
ΟΗ
2
b
Ο
N
Ο
R
O
N
5: pyrid-2-yl
6: pyrid-3-yl
7: pyrid-4-yl
O
Ο
R
O
c
Ο
N
O
HX
N
Ο
O
Ο
HX
N
3:HCl
4:PhSO3H
O
Scheme 2. Synthesis of CPS11 pro-drugs. Reagents and conditions: (a) 30% CH2O aqueous solution, reflux, 1 h, yield: 53.9%; (b) RC(O)Cl, TEA, DCM, rt, overnight, yields: 80–
90%; (c) dilute hydrochloric acid, or PhSO3H, DCM, 30 min.
(results will be published elsewhere). They all are metabolized into
CPS11 in the preliminary pharmacokinetic screening in rats and
meet requirement for further evaluation. Compound 6 was chosen
for efficacy study and salt form screening because its another
metabolite except CPS11 generated in vivo is the endogenous nic-
otinic acid which is not toxic.
The stability of CPS11, 3, and 4 was determined by HPLC. The
purity of CPS11 decreased to 58.9% from 91.6% when stored at
room temperature for 1 month. While after 2 months storage, the
purity of 3 and 4 remained unchanged as their initial purity of
99.3% and 98.9%, respectively. The water solubility of 3 and 4,
determined using UV, is 1.48 and 0.84 mg/mL, respectively. Com-
pounds 3 and 4 are stable more than 8 h in aqueous solution. They
are more stable than compounds reported by Hess.3 After single
intragastric administration to rats, the bioavailability of 4 is
60.7%. When intravenously administered, 4 is rapidly metabolized
into CPS11, indicating that 4 behaves as pro-drug of CPS11 in vivo.
Compounds 5, 6, and 7 inhibit ECV-304 cell growth in a concen-
tration dependent fashion.8 Their IC50s to inhibit the growth of cell
and 4 combined with Taxol treated groups were 33.1% and 74.3%,
respectively, suggesting that 4 could enhance anti-cancer efficacy
of Taxol in this experiment. Compound 4 did not increase the tox-
icity of Taxol. All mice survived and no significant body weight loss
was observed.
In summary, novel pro-drugs of CPS11, 3, and 4 are stable,
water soluble, and oral bio-available. The in vitro anti-angiogenic
efficacy of 6, the free base form of 4, is better than that of thalido-
mide as demonstrated in ECV-304 cell growth assay and HUVEC
tube formation assay. Significant synergic anti-cancer effect of 4
and Taxol is observed on MX-1 human breast cancer xenograft
model. Efficacy of 4 to inhibit cancer metastasis is being evaluated
on lung metastasis model and will be reported on due date. Com-
pound 4 is well tolerated when administered as a single agent or
with Taxol. These results warrant further evaluation of 4 as a novel
anti-cancer agent.
Supplementary data
line ECV-304 were 0.1, 0.12, and 0.18 lM, respectively. The maxi-
mum inhibition rate for thalidomide in the same assay was around
40%.
Supplementary data associated (general procedures and spec-
tral data) with this article can be found, in the online version, at
HUVEC proliferation was significantly decreased (88–94%) by 5,
6, and 7 at 195
formation at 195
l
M.9 Thalidomide was found to inhibit 53% tube
References and notes
lM in the same assay.
1. Warfel, N. A.; Lepper, E. R.; Zhang, C. Y.; Figg, W. D.; Dennis, P. A. Cancer Ther.:
Preclinical 2006, 12, 3502.
2. Ng, S. S. W.; Gütschow, M.; Weiss, M.; Hauschildt, S.; Teubert, U.; Hecker, T. K.;
Luzzio, F. A.; Kruger, E. A.; Eger, K.; Figg, W. D. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 3189.
3. Hess, S.; Akermann, M. A.; Wnendt, S.; Zwingenberger, K.; Eger, K. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2001, 9, 1279.
Many studies showed that inhibitors of angiogenesis like thalid-
omide can enhance the anti-tumor efficacy of cell toxin anticancer
agents and Taxol is one of the most effective anti-tumor agents
currently used for the therapy of breast cancer with microtubule
stabilizing properties.10 Anti-cancer efficacy of compound 4 and
the synergic anti-cancer effect of 4 and Taxol were carried out on
MX-1 human breast cancer xenograft model.11 Compound 4 was
administered daily at a dosage of 65 mg/kg ip to mice with estab-
lished tumors from day 7 after inoculation for five consecutive
days. Taxol was administered at a dosage of 5 mg/kg iv on day 7
after inoculation. No significant efficacy on tumor growth in group
treated by 4 was observed. Tumor growth inhibition rates in Taxol
4. Nightingale, S. L. JAMA 1998, 280, 872.
5. Ge, Y.; Montano, I.; Rustici, G.; Freebern, W. J.; Haggerty, C. M.; Cui, W. M.;
Ponciano-Jackson, D.; Chandramouli, G. V. R.; Gardner, E. R.; Figg, W. D.; Abu-
Asab, M.; Tsokos, M.; Jackson, S. H.; Gardner, K. Blood 2006, 108, 4126.
6. Ng, S. S. W.; MacPherson, G. R.; Gütschow, M.; Eger, K.; Figg, W. D. Clin. Cancer
Res. 2004, 10, 4192.
7. 1H NMR of compound 6 (CDCl3, ppm) d 9.2(s, 1H), 8.78(d, 1H, J = 4.0 Hz), 8.29(d,
1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.87–7.90(m, 2H), 7.75–7.78(m, 2H), 7.41(dd, 1H, J = 4.0, 8.0 Hz),
6.17(d, 1H, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.09(d, 1H, J = 9.6 Hz), 5.09–5.14(m, 1H), 3.02–3.17(m,
1H), 2.80–2.95(m, 2H), 2.17–2.28(m, 1H); MS (M+H) 394.