LETTER
Multicomponent Synthesis of Quinolines in Ionic Liquid
2161
Table 2 Synthesis of Substituted Quinolines Using Yb(OTf)3 in Ionic Liquid under MW Irradiationa (continued)
Entry R1
R2
R3
Productb
Yield (%)c Mp (°C)
Br
N
19
4-NCC6H4
4-BrC6H4
4-MeC6H4
4s
90
220–222
NC
a Reaction conditions: aldehyde (1 mmol), alkyne (1 mmol), aniline (1 mmol), MW irradiation at 80 W, 80 °C, 5.5 bar, 3 min.
b All compounds showed satisfactory 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and mass data.
c Isolated yield.
d Yields for four cycles were 90%, 88%, 85%, and 86%, respectively.
Niedbala, H.; Podeszwa, B.; Palka, A.; Majerz-Maniecka,
K.; Oleksyn, B.; Polanski, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 15,
3592.
We subsequently investigated the possibility of recycling
of the catalyst. After a first cycle of the model reaction the
product was extracted with ethyl acetate–hexane, and the
ionic liquid containing Yb(OTf)3 was dried under reduced
pressure. The ionic liquid thus recovered was charged
with fresh benzaldehyde, phenylacetylene, and aniline, ir-
radiated under the same conditions, and the product ex-
tracted. The above sequence was repeated four times to
give 4a in good yields (90%, 88%, 85%, and 86%) with-
out significant loss in catalytic activity of the Yb(OTf)3.
(6) (a) Heiniger, B.; Gakhar, G.; Prasain, K.; Hua, D. H.;
Nguyen, T. A. Anticancer Res. 2010, 30, 3927.
(b) Fujimoto, S. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 1923.
(7) (a) Korivi, R. P.; Cheng, C.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
7079. (b) Sarma, R.; Prajapati, D. Synlett 2008, 3001.
(c) Lekhok, K. C.; Prajapati, D.; Boruah, R. C. Synlett 2008,
655. (d) Zhang, Z.; Tang, J.; Wang, Z. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
173. (e) Sandelier, M. J.; DeShong, P. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
3209.
In summary, we have developed a straightforward and ef-
ficient method for the synthesis of quinolines by the
Yb(OTf)3-catalyzed three-component reaction of alde-
hydes, alkynes, and amines under microwave irradiation
in ionic liquid. A series of 2,4-disubstituted quinolines has
been synthesized in excellent yield (69–93%). The cata-
lyst can be recycled up to four cycles without significant
decrease in catalytic activity. Short reaction times, an en-
vironment friendly catalyst, and excellent yields are the
advantages of the method which will make it a practical
method for synthesis of substituted quinolines over exist-
ing methods.
(8) (a) Dömling, A.; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
3168. (b) Dömling, A. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 17.
(c) Sunderhaus, J. D.; Martin, S. F. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15,
1300. (d) Ramon, D. J.; Yus, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 1602.
(9) (a) Cao, K.; Zhang, F.; Tu, Y. Q.; Zhuo, X.; Fan, C. A. Chem.
Eur. J. 2009, 15, 6332. (b) Xiao, F.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.;
Wang, J. B. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 2755. (c) Huang, H.;
Jiang, H.; Chen, K.; Liu, H. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5476.
(d) Guchhait, S.; Jadeja, K.; Madaan, C. Tetrahedron Lett.
2009, 50, 6861. (e) Gaddam, V.; Ramesh, S.; Nagarajan, R.
Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 4218. (f) Li, X.; Mao, Z.; Wang, Y.;
Chen, W.; Lin, X. Tetrahedron 2011, 3858.
(10) (a) Dallinger, D.; Kappe, C. O. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2563.
(b) Martínez-Palou, R. Mol. Diversity 2006, 10, 435.
(c) Polshettiwar, V.; Nadagouda, M. N.; Varma, R. S. Aust.
J. Chem. 2009, 62, 16.
Acknowledgment
(11) (a) Forsyth, S. A.; Pringle, J. M.; MacFarlane, D. R. Aust. J.
Chem. 2004, 57, 113. (b) Leadbeater, N. E.; Torenius, H. M.
J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3145. (c) Hoffmann, J.; Nüchter,
M.; Ondruschka, B.; Wasserscheid, P. Green Chem. 2003, 5,
296.
(12) Palimkar, S. S.; Siddiqui, S. A.; Daniel, T.; Lahoti, R. J.;
Srinivasan, K. V. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9373.
(13) (a) Kumar, A.; Rao, M. S.; Rao, V. K. Aust. J. Chem. 2010,
63, 135. (b) Kumar, A.; Rao, M. S.; Rao Ahmad, I.;
Khungar, B. Aus. J. Chem. 2009, 62, 322. (c) Kumar, A.;
Ahmad, I.; Rao, M. S. J. Sulfur Chem. 2009, 30, 570.
(d) Kumar, A.; Ahmed, I.; Rao, M. S. Can. J. Chem. 2008,
86, 899. (e) Kumar, A.; Jain, N.; Rana, S.; Chauhan, S. M. S.
Synlett 2004, 2785.
(14) Synthesis of 2,4-Diphenylquinoline (4a)
A mixture of benzaldehyde (106 mg, 1 mmol), aniline (93
mg, 1 mmol), phenylacetylene (102 mg, 1 mmol), and
Yb(OTf)3 (62 mg, 10 mol%) was taken in a tube containing
2 mL of [bmim][BF4] and placed under MW irradiation in a
CEM Discover BenchMate® reactor. The reaction
parameters were set to 80 W, 80 °C for 3 min under stirring.
After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was
We thank the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi
for a grant to purchase a focused microwave under the FIST pro-
gramme. VKR is thankful to BITS Pilani for a Research Fellowship.
References and Notes
(1) Michael, J. P. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 166.
(2) (a) Foley, M.; Tilley, L. Int. J. Parasitol. 1997, 27, 231.
(b) Egan, T. J. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2001, 11, 185.
(3) McCormick, J. L.; McKee, T. C.; Cardellina, J. H. II.; Boyd,
M. R. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 469.
(4) (a) Eswaran, S.; Adhikari, A. V.; Chowdhury, I. H.; Pal, N.
K.; Thomas, K. D. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 3374. (b) de
Souza, M. V.; Pais, K. C.; Kaiser, C. R.; Peralta, M. A.;
de L Ferreira, M.; Lourenço, M. C. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2009, 17, 1474. (c) Vangapandu, S.; Jain, M.; Jain, R.; Kaur,
S.; Singh, P. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 2501.
(5) (a) Eswaran, S.; Adhikari, A. V.; Shetty, N. S. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2009, 4637. (b) Musiol, R.; Serda, M.; Hensel-
Bielowka, S.; Polanski, J. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17,
1960. (c) Musiol, R.; Jampilek, J.; Buchta, V.; Silva, L.;
Synlett 2011, No. 15, 2157–2162 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York