date only one example of use of a catalytically active triol-
hybrid reported.4a
retain some activity after the replacement of one sp3 oxo of
the POM framework with an sp2 one.
The redox properties of representative examples of urea
and carbamate hybrids were investigated by cyclovoltam-
metry. Two reductions were observed between 0 and
ꢀ1 V vs Fcþ/Fc (Fc = ferrocene) in acetonitrile at a fast
scan rate. Whereas the first reduction is pseudoreversible,
the second wave is large and likely corresponds to the
superposition of two redox processes. Indeed, at a slow
scan rate and on a freshly polished electrode, the second
process splits into two waves. Detailed analysis of the
second process is hampered by the strong adsorption of
the compounds on the electrode surface.
The electrochemical potentials fall into the same range as
those for triol- and diol-amide substituted [P2V3W15O62]9ꢀ
(Table 3).4a,5a The new hybrid compounds should therefore
be able to promote the same redox reactions as the pre-
viously reported derivatives. One notes variations of the
potential with different substituents in the para position of
the aromatic ring. However, in contrast to what was
observed with diol-amide ligands, there is no direct correla-
tion between the electron-donating or -accepting properties
(Hammett parameters) and the value of the reduction
potential. This indicates that, in ureas and carbamates, there
is no through-bond interaction between the R groups and
the polyoxometallic framework.
Four POMs (one urea (3i), two carbamates (3k, 3o), and
one amide5a (3r, R1 = p-Me-C6H4)) derivatives were
selected across the board for that purpose. In a typical
experiment tetrahydrothiophene was treated with tBuOOH
in the presence of POM 3k (0.017 mol %) in acetonitrile at
rt. This delivered 88% of the corresponding sulfoxide 6
(Table 4, entry 1; the yields were measured by NMR using
trimethoxybenzene as internal standard). No sulfone was
observed in any of those reactions.
Control experiments showed that no reaction took place
without a POM using either TBHP or H2O2. Also, tetra-
butylammonium (as TBABr or TBAOH, 1 equiv) alone
did not catalyze the oxidation. This unambiguously de-
monstrates that the POM is a catalyst which needs to be
reactivated by a stoichiometric reoxidant. The reaction
was not limited to 3k but worked well also with 3o (77%,
entry 3), 3i (entry 4), and 3r (entry 5). Gratifyingly, the
catalyst could be recycled upon precipitation in diethyl
ether and reused (90%, entry 6).
Most interestingly, the reaction also worked in the pre-
sence of H2O2 (30% in water) as an oxidant (entry 2). This is
important from a green chemistry point of view and shows
that the hybrids are not much sensitive to water. For H2O2
also the POM acted as a catalyst. Our hybrids compare in
fact very well to the purely inorganic 1 (entry 7).
Inthe hypothesisthatthe vanadium sites of the POM are
involved in the oxidation, one can anticipate that organic
ligands on the vanadiums might modify the reactivity of
the system and allow fine-tuning of the catalyst. We thus
decided to approach this issue from the chemoselectivity
angle.
Table 3. Redox Potentials for the First Two Reduction Pro-
cesses of Representative Urea and Carbamate-Inserted
Vanadotungstatesa
1st process
E1 (mV vs Fc)
2nd process
POM
ΔEp (mV)
E2 (mV vs Fc)
3b
3d
3e
3f
ꢀ273
ꢀ353
ꢀ246
ꢀ323
ꢀ332
ꢀ343
ꢀ307
84
ꢀ620
ꢀ659
ꢀ621
ꢀ630
ꢀ538
ꢀ611
ꢀ600
168
108
162
132
239
102
Table 4. Use of Carbonyl-Inserted POMs As Catalysts for the
Oxidation of Sulfides
3m
3n
3o
a Redox potentials were measured by cyclovoltammetry at rt in
MeCN (0.1 M TBAPF6) on glassy carbon electrode at 300 mV sꢀ1
.
3
Values are quoted vs ferrocene as internal standard. For the quasi-
reversible first process the half-wave potentials and peak differences are
given. Broad waves were observed for the second process, and only the
reduction peak potential is reported.
entry
POM
cations
oxidant
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3k
3k
3o
3i
(TBA)4.8(DMA)0.2
(TBA)4.7(DMA)0.3
(TBA)4.6(DMA)0.4
(TBA)4.6(DMA)0.4
(TBA)4.6(DMA)0.4
(TBA)4.6(DMA)0.4
(TBA)5.3H3.7
tBuOOH
H2O2
88
96
77
97
85
90a
75
tBuOOH
tBuOOH
tBuOOH
tBuOOH
tBuOOH
The known POM-catalyzed oxidation of sulfides7 to
sulfoxides is a good benchmark for catalytic oxidations
with the carbonyl-inserted organo-POMs, provided they
3r
3r
1
a Reaction carried out after recycling of 3r by precipitation.
(7) Selected recent examples: (a) Carraro, M.; Nsouli, N.; Oelrich, H.;
Sartorel, A.; Soraru, A.; Mal, S. S.; Scorrano, G.; Walder, L.; Kortz, U.;
Bonchio, M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 8371–8378. (b) Jahier, C.;
Coustou, M.-F.; Cantuel, M.; McClenaghan, N. D.; Buffeteau, T.;
Cavagnat, D.; Carraro, M.; Nlate, S. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 727–
738. (c) Khenkin, A. M.; Leitus, G.; Neumann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 11446–11448. (d) Mizuno, N.; Uchida, S.; Kamata, K.;
Ishimoto, R.; Nojima, S.; Yonehara, K.; Sumida, Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9972–9976. (e) Nisar, A.; Lu, Y.; Zhuang, J.; Wang, X.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3187–3192. See also ref 4a.
Two different sulfides (tetrahydrothiophene and phenyl
methyl sulfide, 1 equiv each) were reacted with 1 equiv of tert-
butyl hydroperoxide in acetonitrile at rt. After consumption
of the co-oxidant (50% complexion with regard to 6 þ 7), the
6:7 ratio was measured by NMR.
5992
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 22, 2011