3252
J.-F. Wu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25 (2015) 3251–3255
H
N
position. However, after regioselective replacement of Cl to a more
active I,18 the transformation of 14 to 15 exhibited a much higher
yield of 93% (from 13 to 15, 70% yield in 2 steps). After addition of
the triple bond, the aldehyde acetal 16 was obtained in 68% yield.
Compound 17 was produced by oxidation of the cyano group, fol-
lowed by cyclization to get compound 18 in 52% yield for 2 steps.19
Afterwards, the preparation of 2 from 18 was the same as that of 1
from 7. Thus, the synthesis of novel scaffold 2 was achieved in 2.9%
overall yield via 11 steps synthetic route.
With scaffolds 1 and 2 in hand, we subsequently proceeded to
the functionalization of their amino groups using MK-2461 as a
reference. Three series of 1,5-naphthyridine derivatives 21–23
and 1,6-naphthyridine derivatives 25–27, including acylated, alky-
lated and sulfonylated derivatives, were designed and synthesized
according to the theory of bioisosterism (Scheme 3). The acylation
of the scaffolds 1 and 2 with various acyl chlorides containing
alkyl, cycloalkyl, phenyl and heterocyclic groups afforded the tar-
get compounds 21 and 25. Unexpectedly, only di-acylated products
24a–e were attained from 1,6-naphthyridine scaffold 2, so alcohol-
ysis of 24a–e was subsequently carried out to get mono-acylated
products 25a–e. Compounds 21 and 25 were refluxed in THF with
reductant LiAlH4 for about 3 h to achieve the alkylated derivatives
22 and 26, respectively. It is worth mentioning that the sulfonyla-
tion of 1 and 2 did not occur by heating at 120 °C, as sulfochlorides
were less active than acylchlorides. The reaction proceeded effi-
ciently under the condition of microwave at 120 °C for 1h to give
23 and 27 in good yields.
O
O
NH2
N
Cl
H
H
F
HN
O
N
N
N
N
H
Cl
Crizotinib
Tivantinib
O
H
N
N
F
N
O
N
N
S
O
H
O
N
O
O
O
O
F
O
Cl
N
H2N
N
BMS-777607
MK-2461
Figure 1. Representatives of c-Met inhibitors.
N
N
N
S
O
H
N
O
3
O
O
O
A
N
MK-2461
N
N
R
N
5
HN
B
H
N
3
N
B
N
3
N 6
R
A
N
A
N
The preliminary c-Met inhibitory activity of these target com-
pounds and their antiproliferative activities in cancer cells were
evaluated and listed in Table 1. The compounds were tested at a
Figure 2. Design of 1,5-naphthyridine and 1,6-naphthyridine scaffolds.
single concentration of 10 lM and defined as effective which inhi-
bit over half of the c-Met kinase at that concentration. Most of the
1,6-naphthyridine derivatives (2, 25a–c, 26a–c, 27h and 27j) were
effective, while a minority of the 1,5-naphthyridine derivatives (1,
21b and 22a–d) were active. Therefore it can be inferred that the
alkylamino side chain at the 5-position was beneficial to the inhi-
bition of c-Met kinase.
The compounds were further tested on the Hela and A549 cell
lines (Table 1). Hela is a cervical cancer cell line and A549 is a lung
cancer cell line, both of which could express high level of c-Met.
1,6-Naphthyridine derivatives performed better than 1,5-naph-
thyridine derivatives on both enzymic and cytotoxic activities,
indicating that 1,6-naphthyridine skeleton could be a potential c-
Met inhibitory structure core. Among 1,5-naphthyridine deriva-
tives, only 21d had cytotoxic activities in Hela and A549 cell lines,
however 21d could merely inhibit around 30% of the c-Met kinase,
indicating that it might follow a different mechanism of action.
Among 1,6-naphthyridine derivatives, 26b, 26c and 27h showed
reaction mixture should be neutralized carefully around 7.0 with
aqueous NaOH, in case product 10 hydrolyzed to 9. The mixture
of compound 10 and 25% aqueous ammonia was stirred at 120 °C
using
a microwave reaction device, but few product was
obtained.15 Finally, the azidation of 10 with NaN3 followed by
16
reduction with SnCl2 gave 1,5-naphthyridine scaffold 1 in 63%
yield for 2 steps. So far, the synthesis of compound 1 was accom-
plished via 7 steps synthetic route with commercial available 3-
aminopyridine and glycerol as starting materials in 3.3% overall
yield.
As shown in Scheme 2, the preparation of scaffold 2 followed a
different synthetic route with
1
using 1,1,3,3-tetram-
ethoxypropane and 2-cyanoacetamide as starting materials. The
compounds 11–13 were synthesized according to the literature
procedures17 in a yield of 26% for 3 steps. The conversion of 13
to 15 was firstly tried by Sonogashira reaction directly, but
achieved a yield as low as 50% since the 5-Br was a competitive
cytotoxic activities with IC50 in the range of 5–10 lM. It was noting
N
NH2
N
N
m-NO2PhSO3Na, glycerol
H2SO4, H2O, 150oC
Br2, NaOAc
AcOH, 85oC
m-CPBA
Br
N
O
DCM
N
N
Br
N
3
4
5 (55%)
6 (67%)
(45%)
N
N
N
8, Pd(PPh3)4, Cs2CO3
TsCl, K2CO3
DCM, H2O
POCl3
reflux
N
H
O
N
Cl
Br
N
H
O
DMF, 100oC
N
N
N
N
7
9
10
(68%)
(62%)
(83%)
N
1) NaN3, DMF, 120oC
2) SnCl2, HCl, MeOH, 60oC
O
B
N
NH2
O
N
N
N
N
1 (63%)
8
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1,5-naphthyridine scaffold 1.