Scheme 1. Torquoselective Formation of Observed Isomers 3b-trans and 3b-cis and Their Rotational and Interconversion Dynamics
observed, as they are too rapid and slow, respectively, on
the NMR time scale. The most pertinent of the observed
processes, illustrated for 3b in Scheme 1, is slow intercon-
version between two isomers, which were identified as cis/
trans isomers about the exocyclic, quinoidal C2ꢀC3 bond
(3b-cis and 3b-trans, Scheme 1); isomer 3b-trans was the
isomer identified by X-ray crystallography. Preferential
formation of 3b-cis and 3b-trans can be attributed to
torquoselectivity.15,16 There are two presumed isomeric
azetine intermediates in the CAꢀCR reaction,16,17 4-syn
and 4-anti, arising from inversion of the pyramidal azetine
nitrogen (Scheme 1), in which the cyano groups occupy the
same or opposite sides of the azacyclobutene ring, respec-
tively. Because the cyano substituents on those nitrogens
are electron-withdrawing, inward rotations of the cyano
groups are favored in the thermally allowed, conrotatory
ring-openings of 4-syn and 4-anti to yield the observed
isomers, 3b-cis and 3b-trans (Scheme 1).16,17 Based on
comparisons between ROESY cross-peak volumes and
line-shape analysis of variable temperature 1H NMR
spectra, the rate of interconversion between 3b-cis and
3b-trans is estimated to be <1 sꢀ1 at 223 K. This estimate is
consistent with the fact that the naphthoquinoid proton
signals of both isomers show no line broadening beyond
3 Hz even at 373 K.
slightly longer than a typical CdC double bond (1.34 A for
ethylene18). Rotation about the C2ꢀC3 bond at relatively
low temperatures might therefore be possible because of
this single-bond character, which is apparent in the
diradical19 and zwitterionic, charge-separated resonance
forms of 3b, 3b-rad and 3b-CT, respectively. In adducts 3a
and 3d, which are derived from symmetric parent DCNQI
1a, quinoidalimine inversion would alsoyield the observed
cis/trans isomers.
Having established the structural dynamics of 3aꢀd, we
sought to examine their optoelectronic properties. Struc-
tural parameters derived from X-ray crystallographic data
suggest a rough correlation between steric bulk and the
degreeof intramolecularCTin3aꢀd. Inadducts 3aand 3d,
the dihedral angle, θ, defined by C3ꢀC2ꢀC4ꢀC5 is
relatively large at ca. 170° (Table 2). In adducts 3b and
3c, which are derived from bulkier DCNQIs, the analo-
gous dihedral angle is smaller (ca. 150°). Increasing steric
bulk about the quinoid moiety therefore induces the
quinoid and adjacent DMA moieties to deviate from
coplanarity, thereby decreasing the conjugation between
them. Conjugation between these moieties is, in turn,
responsible for the intramolecular CT in the chromo-
phores, which is manifested in the solid state as bond-
length alternation in the aniline rings (δr, see Table 2
footnote for definition).20 In sterically encumbered
3b and 3c, δr for ring B is small (0.03 A) compared to
Interconversion between the two cis/trans isomers in
adducts 3bꢀc results from apparent bond rotation about
the C2ꢀC3 bond (Scheme 1). For all four adducts, this
C2ꢀC3 bond length ranges from 1.38ꢀ1.41 A, which is
(18) Allen, F. H.; Kennard, O.; Watson, D. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1987, S1–S19.
(19) (a) Doering, W.; von, E.; Roth, W. R.; Bauer, F.; Boenke, M.;
Breuckmann, R.; Ruhkamp, J.; Wortmann, O. Chem. Ber. 1991, 124,
1461–1470. (b) Doering, W.; von, E.; Kitagawa, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 4288–4297.
(15) For a review on torquoselectivity, see: Dolbier, W. R.; Koroniak,
H.; Houk, K. N.; Sheu, C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 471–477.
(16) For the torquoselectivity of azetine ring-openings, see: (a) Kallel,
A. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 1991.
(b) Mangelinckx, S.; Van Speybroeck, V.; Vansteenkiste, P.; Waroquier,
M.; De Kimpe, N. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5481–5488.
ꢀ
(20) (a) Dehu, F.; Meyers, F.; Bredas, J.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 6198–6206. (b) Hilger, A.; Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Tykwinski, R. R.;
€
Boudon, C.; Schreiber, M.; Martin, R. E.; Luthi, H. P.; Gross, M.;
(17) Warrener, R. N.; Kretschmer, G.; Paddon-Row, M. N. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1977, 806–807.
Diederich, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2069–2078. (c) Moonen,
N. N. P.; Diederich, F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 2263–2266.
56
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2012