well to afford 17 in a 97% yield. Similar results (88–96%) were
also observed with products 18–24, which further demon-
strated that electronic and steric properties of the substituents
in the arylamines are fully compatible. Electron-donating
groups facilitate the amination and are slightly more efficient
than electron-deficient groups (91–92% vs. 88% for 19a and
20 vs. 19b). To our surprise, more hindered substrates, such as
2,4,6-trimethylaniline and 2,6-diisopropyl-aniline, even resulted
in better yields (95% and 96% for 22 and 23 respectively) than
naphthylamine (89%, 24). Aliphatic primary amines were also
tolerated, again, the bulky amine resulted in a higher yield
(97% vs. 91%, 26 vs. 25). When a chiral amine was applied, a
94% yield was obtained for the product 27 without influencing
the configuration of the chiral center.
Beside various secondary amines, a wide range of primary
amines were coupled successfully with aryl chlorides in a
monoarylation manner at low catalyst loadings demonstrating
exceptional reactivity, selectivity and stability of the molecular
catalyst derived from complex 2. The protocol represents a
general, practical and scalable approach to access various
structurally intriguing and functionalized arylamines.
Financial support from the National Natural Science Foun-
dation of China (No. 20902001), the Shanghai Municipal and
Technology Commission (2010MCIMKF04 and Qimingxing
Program No. 10A1400500) and the Shanghai Leading Academic
Discipline Project (B108) is gratefully acknowledged.
Notes and references
In order to clarify the possibility of Pd nanoparticles acting
as catalytic species in the amination, catalyst poisoning experi-
ments were involved (see ESIw). At first, a set of mercury tests14
were performed under standard conditions. With 0.075 mol%
precatalyst 2, one drop of Hg was added to the reaction
mixture after 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6 and 12 hours resulting in 50%,
91%, 91%, 90%, 94%, and 98% yields for product 3, which
suggested that the reaction may follow the NHC–Pd(0) molecular
catalytic route. Secondly, an excess of poly(4-vinylpyridine)
(PVPy) was also included in the catalyst poisoning experi-
ments.14 A 97% isolated yield of 3 confirmed that the mole-
cular catalyst derived from complex 2 played the real role in
the reaction, which may arise from the strong s-donating
property of acenaphthoimidazol-ylidene which stabilized the
Pd–C bond and avoided the formation of Pd nanoparticles.
To further extend the potential application of our protocol
in the pharmaceutical targets, the syntheses of key intermediates
for the antibiotic drug Linezolid and non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drug Mefenamic acid were performed. The
coupling between o-chloro-fluorobenzene and morpholine
proceeded well with 1 mol% complex 2 and afforded product
28 in 72% (Scheme 1a), which was readily further converted
into Linezolid according to the reported procedure.15a In the
literature, compound 29 was prepared from Mefenamic acid in
four steps under harsh reaction conditions.15b However, with
0.5 mol% complex 2, the amination of 2-chlorobenzonitrile
with 2,3-dimethylaniline resulted in 80% isolated yield of 29
(Scheme 1b), which can be scaled up to 20 mmol. By hydration
of 29, Mefenamic acid was obtained in 95% yield.
1 (a) S. Suwanprasop, T. Nhujak, S. Roengsumran and A. Petsom,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2004, 43, 4973; (b) Amines: Synthesis,
Properties and Application, ed. S. A. Lawrence, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 2004; (c) Industrial Organic
Chemistry, ed. K. Weissermel and H. J. Arpe, Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, Germany, 1997.
2 (a) March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms and
Structure, ed. M. B. Smith and J. March, John Wiley & Sons Inc.,
New York, 5th edn, 2001; (b) H. Heaney, Chem. Rev., 1962, 62, 81.
3 (a) J. F. Hartwig, Synlett, 2006, 1238; (b) Handbook of
Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis, ed.
J. F. Hartwig and E. I. Negishi, Wiley-Interscience, New York,
2002; (c) Modern Amination Methods, ed. J. F. Hartwig and
A. Ricci, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000.
4 A. F. Littke and G. C. Fu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 4176.
5 D. S. Surry and S. L. Buchwald, Chem. Sci., 2011, 2, 27.
6 (a) K. H. Hoi, S. C¸ alimsiz, R. D. J. Froese, A. C. Hopkinson and
M. G. Organ, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 3086; (b) M. G. Organ,
M. Abdel-Hadi, S. Avola, I. Dubovyk, N. Hadei,
E. A. B. Kantchev, C. J. O’Brien, M. Sayah and C. Valente,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 2443.
7 N. Marion and S. P. Nolan, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1440.
8 (a) G. D. Vo and J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,
131, 11049; (b) J. F. Hartwig, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1534.
9 (a) T. Tu, W. Fang, X. Bao, X. Li and K. H. Dotz, Angew. Chem.,
¨
Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 6601; (b) T. Tu, X. Bao, W. Assenmacher,
H. Peterlik, J. Daniels and K. H. Dotz, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009,
¨
15, 1853; (c) T. Tu, W. Assenmacher, H. Peterlik,
G. Schnakenburg and K. H. Dotz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008,
¨
47, 7127; (d) T. Tu, W. Assenmacher, H. Peterlik, R. Weisbarth,
M. Nieger and K. H. Dotz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 6368.
¨
10 (a) Z. Wang, X. Feng, W. Fang and T. Tu, Synlett, 2011, 951;
(b) T. Tu, X. Feng, Z. Wang and X. Liu, Dalton Trans., 2010,
10598; (c) T. Tu, H. Mao, C. Herbert, M. Xu and K. H. Dotz,
¨
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7796; (d) T. Tu, J. Malineni, X. Bao and
K. H. Dotz, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 1029; (e) T. Tu,
¨
11 (a) F. E. Hahn and M. C. Jahnke, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
¨
J. Malineni and K. H. Dotz, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350, 1791.
In summary, a robust precatalyst 2 was developed and
revealed high activity in the amination of (hetero)-aryl chlorides.
2008, 47, 3122; (b) N. Marion, S. Dılez-Gonzalez and
´ ´
S. P. Nolan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 2988; (c) O. Kuhl,
¨
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 592; (d) F. E. Hahn, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 1348; (e) F. E. Hahn, L. Wittenbecher,
D. Le Van and R. Frohlich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000,
¨
39, 541; (f) F. E. Hahn, L. Wittenbecher, R. Boese and
D. Blaser, Chem.–Eur. J., 1999, 5, 1931.
¨
12 J. Nasielski, N. Hadei, G. Achonduh, E. A. B. Kantchev,
C. J. O’Brien, A. Lough and M. G. Organ, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010,
16, 10844.
13 B. Schlummer and U. Scholz, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2004, 346, 1599.
14 K. Yu, W. Sommer, J. M. Richardson, M. Weck and C. W. Jones,
Adv. Synth. Catal., 2005, 347, 161.
15 (a) S. D. Ramgren, A. L. Silberstein, Y. Yang and N. K. Garg,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 2171; (b) P. F. Juby,
T. W. Hudyma and M. Brown, J. Med. Chem., 1968, 11, 111.
Scheme 1 Synthesis of intermediates of (a) Linezolid and (b) Mefenamic
acid.
c
12360 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 12358–12360
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011