EFFECT OF THE NATURE OF THE TETRAPYRROLE MACROCYCLE
485
plates. The solvents were purified by published proceꢀ
dures [14].
R
Synthesis of Pd2+ 5,10,15,20ꢀtetraphenylporphyrin
(I). (a) A mixture of complex VI (0.05 g) and PdCl2
(0.13 g) in the molar ratio 1 : 10 was dissolved in DMF
(20 mL), and the mixture was refluxed for 4 min,
cooled, and poured in water. The precipitate was filꢀ
tered off, washed with water, dried, and chromatoꢀ
graphed on alumina with chloroform elution. Yield
0.043 g (0.0598 mmol), 81%. Rf = 0.78 (elution with
hexane–chloroform (1 : 2)).
N
N
N
N
N
N
R
M
R
R
M
N
N
М = Pd2+, R = C6H5 (
М = Zn2+, R = C6H5 (VI),
М = Cd2+, R = С6Н5 (VII)
I
),
M = Pd2+
M = Zn2+
M = Cd2+
(II),
(XII),
(XIII),
1H NMR (
, ppm, CDCl3): 8.84 (s, 8 H, pyrrole
δ
,
ring), 8.20 (d, 8H, ortho), 7.81 (t, 8H, meta), 7.76 (t,
4H, para).
M = Pd2+, R = C6H4ꢀ4ꢀCl (IV),
M = Zn2+, R = C6H4ꢀ4Cl (VIII),
M = Cd2+, R = C6H4ꢀ4Cl (IX),
The 1H NMR spectrum of the starting ZnTPhP (
,
δ
ppm, CDCl3): 8.97 (s, 8H), 8.25 (d, 8H), 7.81 (t, 8H),
7.77 (t, 4 H).
М = Pd2+, R = C6H4ꢀ4ꢀOCH3 (
M = Zn2+, R = C6H4ꢀ4ꢀOCH3 (
M = Cd2+, R = C6H4ꢀ4ꢀOCH3 (XI),
V
),
(b) Complex VII (0.05 g) and PdCl2 (0.037 g) (1 :
3 mol/mol) were refluxed in DMF (20 mL) for 2 min.
Yield 0.04 g (0.0556 mmol), 81%. Rf = 0.78.
X
),
For PdC44N4H28 anal. calcd. (%): C, 73.48; N,
7.79; H, 3.93.
R
R
N
M
N
R
Found (%): C, 73.46; N, 7.77, H, 3.90.
R
N
N
N
MS:
IR (
m
ν
/
z
= 718.1 (
I
rel = 87%) [M+].
N
N
, cm–1): 3053 (w), 3016 (w), 2923 (m), 2852 (w),
N
R
R
1803 (w), 1598 (m), 1538 (w), 1490 (w), 1441 (m),
1353 (m), 1311 (w), 1209 (w), 1177 (w), 1075 (m),
1015 (s), 836 (w), 796 (m), 752 (m), 701 (m), 667 (w),
528 (w), 466 (w).
R
R
M = Pd2+, R = C6H5 (III),
M = Zn2+, R = C6H5 (XIV).
Pd2+ tetrabenzoporphyrin (II) was synthesized by a
modification of a reported procedure [7]. A mixture of
complex XIII (0.05 g) and PdCl2 (0.14 g) (molar ratio
1 : 10) in DMF (80 mL) was refluxed for 10 min and
cooled, the precipitate was filtered off, and the filtrate
was poured in water. The precipitate was filtered off,
washed with water and ethanol, and chromatographed
on alumina (elution with pyridine–diethyl ether (1 : 4)).
The yield of complex II was 0.037 g (0.06 mmol), 75%.
Rf = 0.62 (elution with diethyl ether).
EXPERIMENTAL
The Zn2+ and Cd2+ porphyrins (VI
–
XI) were synꢀ
thesized from appropriate porphyrin ligands [9, 10] by
the Adler method [11]. The Zn2+ and Cd2+ porphyrins
(
XII–XIV) were prepared by the Linstead method [12,
13]. The transmetallation reactions of Zn2+ and Cd2+
porphyrins with PdCl2 in DMF were monitored by
spectrophotometry and TLC. The spectrophotometric
procedure was as follows: samples of equal volume
were taken from the reaction mixture at specified
intervals and dissolved in specified amounts of DMF,
and the solutions were placed in the spectrophotometꢀ
ric cell. The UV–Vis spectra were recorded on a Caryꢀ
100 spectrophotometer at 298 K. Electron impact
mass spectra were run on an MXꢀ1310 massꢀspectroꢀ
metric setup at an ionizing energy of 70 eV and ionizaꢀ
For PdC36H20N4 anal. calcd. (%): C, 70.31; N,
9.11; H, 3.28.
Found (%): C, 70.25; N, 9.07; H, 3.24.
1Н NMR (
9.93 (s, 8H), 8.32 (s, 8H).
IR (
, cm–1): 2922, 2847 (νС–Н, –С6Н4), 1727, 1606,
δ, ppm, [D6] DMSO): 11.30 (s, 4H),
ν
1568 (νC=C, –C6H4), 1460 (νC=N), 1430, 1372,
1323 (νC–N), 1257, 1122 (δC–H, –C6H4), 1066, 1011
(
⎯
γC–C
С6Н4), 454 (νPd–N
Synthesis of Pd2+ 5,10,15,20ꢀtetra(4ꢀchloropheꢀ
, δC–H), 831 (γC–H, pyrrole ring), 755, 706 (γС–Н,
).
tion chamber temperature of 150–200 С. Elemental
analysis was performed on a Flash EA 1112 analyzer.
The H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV
IIIꢀ500 instrument, IR spectra were measured on an
Avatar 360ꢀFTꢀIRꢀESP instrument for KBr pellets.
°
1
nyl)porphyrin (IV). (a) Complex VIII (0.05 g), PdCl2
(0.11 g) (1 : 10 mol/mol) in DMF (10 mL) was
refluxed for 5 min. Yield 0.041 g (0.0478 mmol), 78%.
Rf = 0.89.
TLC analysis was performed on Silufol (G/UV254
)
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 56 No. 3 2011