(see Fig. S5, ESIz). Around these vacancies, the hexagonal
lattice is preserved and just one monomer is missing, leading to
AA stacking.
In summary, we show that a covalent hybrid-network
consisting of both phenyl and boroxine rings can be synthe-
sized entirely in UHV from a comparatively simple monomer.
The employed monomer was doubly functionalized with both
boronic acid groups and bromine substituents for condensation
and radical addition reactions, respectively. We find that
vacuum sublimation of even comparatively small boronic acids
is not possible, because increasing the crucible temperature
up to the sublimation point already thermally activates self-
condensation. Then again, the preferred and reliable self-
condensation of boronic acids into boroxine rings can also
serve as a design principle for carrying out the last synthesis
step in the crucible of the Knudsen cell and deposit more
complex monomers from abundantly available, structurally
simpler precursor molecules.
We thank Dr A. M. Gigler for Raman measurements and
S. Hug and Prof. B. V. Lotsch for NMR measurements.
Funding by the Nanosystems-Initiative Munich (NIM) cluster
of excellence, Elitenetzwerk Bayern (St. S.) and Verband der
Chemischen Industrie (T.S.) is gratefully acknowledged.
Fig. 3 (a) Overview and (b) close-up STM topographs (+0.7 V, 50 pA)
of annealed TDPBP monolayers on Ag(111). Thermally activated
dehalogenation and radical addition yield covalent networks. (c)
Line-profile along A–B in image (a); it indicates a lattice parameter,
i.e. interpore distance, of (0.78 ꢀ 0.10) nm. (d) Close-up of covalent
networks with molecular overlay. The aggregate is formed by exclusive
AB stacking.
Notes and references
1 A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater., 2007, 6, 183–191.
2 J. Wintterlin and M. L. Bocquet, Surf. Sci., 2009, 603, 1841–1852.
3 H. C. Schniepp, J. L. Li, M. J. McAllister, H. Sai, M. Herrera-
Alonso, D. H. Adamson, R. K. Prud’homme, R. Car, D. A. Saville
and I. A. Aksay, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 8535–8539.
4 A. Gourdon, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 6950–6953.
5 D. F. Perepichka and F. Rosei, Science, 2009, 323, 216–217.
6 J. Sakamoto, J. van Heijst, O. Lukin and A. D. Schluter, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 1030–1069.
comparison of precise experimental STM derived structure
parameters with theoretical values. The line-profile in Fig. 3(c)
indicates a spacing between adjacent six-membered rings of
(0.78 ꢀ 0.10) nm. This value is in perfect agreement with the
0.78 nm as obtained from geometry optimized DFT calculations
of the P6mm structure (cf. ESIz).
7 C. H. Schmitz, J. Ikonomov and M. Sokolowski, J. Phys. Chem. C,
2009, 113, 11984.
The DFT calculations also yield an approximative value of
2.8 eV for the HOMO–LUMO energy gap. The electronic
states do not exhibit a significant dispersion in k-space. This
means that electrons are localized with low mobility and
almost infinite effective mass. Similar hexagonal networks that
only consist of phenylene rings show a less flat dispersion
relation. Comparison of those structurally similar networks
denotes effective electronic decoupling through boroxine
rings22 (details can be found in ESIz).
8 S. Weigelt, C. Busse, C. Bombis, M. M. Knudsen, K. V. Gothelf,
E. Lægsgaard, F. Besenbacher and T. R. Linderoth, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 4406.
9 N. A. A. Zwaneveld, R. Pawlak, M. Abel, D. Catalin, D. Gigmes,
D. Bertin and L. Porte, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6678–6679.
10 M. Bieri, M. Nguyen, O. Groning, J. Cai, M. Treier, K. Ait-
Mansour, P. Ruffieux, C. Pignedoli, D. Passerone, M. Kastler,
K. Mullen and R. Fasel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
16669–16676.
11 L. Grill, M. Dyer, L. Lafferentz, M. Persson, M. Peters and
S. Hecht, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2007, 2, 687–691.
12 R. Gutzler, H. Walch, G. Eder, S. Kloft, W. M. Heckl and
M. Lackinger, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4456–4458.
13 A. P. Cote, A. I. Benin, N. W. Ockwig, M. O’Keeffe, A. J. Matzger
and O. M. Yaghi, Science, 2005, 310, 1166–1170.
14 M. J. Farrall and J. M. J. Frechet, J. Org. Chem., 1976, 41,
3877–3882.
15 J. Pellon, L. H. Schwind, M. J. Guinard and W. M. Thomas,
J. Polym. Sci., 1961, 55, 161–167.
16 A. L. Korich and P. M. Iovine, Dalton Trans., 2010, 39, 1423–1431.
17 A. B. Morgan, J. L. Jurs and J. M. Tour, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.,
2000, 76, 1257–1268.
The covalent phenylene–boroxine networks do not exhibit
long-range order. Yet, in covalent networks that were synthesized
from structurally much simpler tritopic monomers as for
instance tribromophenylbenzene12,21 non-ideal strained covalent
rings composed of more or less than six monomers occur with
densities comparable to those of ideal rings. In polymerized
TDBPB networks strained rings are only observed occasionally
(cf. ESIz). Apparently, their formation becomes less likely due
to the complex bond topology of the six-fold bromine-
substituted monomer. Although the polymerized TDBPB
networks exhibit mostly regular rings, the resulting domain
size is comparatively small. Different azimuthal orientations to
the substrate impair coherent interconnection into long-range
ordered networks. In contrast to covalent networks from
simple tritopic monomers, now vacancies can be observed
18 E. Bosch and C. L. Barnes, Cryst. Growth Des., 2002, 2, 299–302.
19 S. L. Price, A. J. Stone, J. Lucas, R. S. Rowland and
A. E. Thornley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 4910–4918.
20 H. Walch, R. Gutzler, T. Sirtl, G. Eder and M. Lackinger, J. Phys.
Chem. C, 2010, 114, 12604–12609.
21 M. O. Blunt, J. C. Russell, N. R. Champness and P. H. Beton,
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7157–7159.
22 D. Armstrong and P. Perkins, J. Chem. Soc. A, 1967, 790–792.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 12355–12357 12357