somewhat larger than expected on the basis of the diffusion
coefficients and most likely distance of closest approach of the
radical and fullerene. It is therefore surprising to find that the
relaxivities of both types of protons in the hydroxylamine of
H2@1 are increased relative to H2@3 by nearly a factor of
five, putting them outside the range of values attainable by
reasonable estimates of diffusion coefficients and distances of
approach. We offer as an explanation for the accelerated
relaxivity an additional contribution to the observed relaxation
rate from the limitation of the lifetime of H2 in the hydroxylamine,
in the slow exchange limit,14 due to exchange between the radical
and hydroxylamine by hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)
unusually large dipolar contribution to the relaxivity between
nitroxides and endofullerenes.13 Such complexation is commonly
invoked to explain enhanced relaxivity between paramagnetic
metal ions and diamagnet substrates.17 In the present case,
however, it is not supported by a model calculation13 of the
potential energy between a nitroxide and a C60 molecule in
the gas phase which predicted a purely repulsive interaction as
the molecules approach each other. Further theoretical, and
refined experimental study of both the uni- and bimolecular
relaxation processes involved here would clearly be desirable.
In summary, we have demonstrated that 1H NMR structural
information of C60 nitroxide derivatives are obtained indirectly
by reduction in situ to the corresponding hydroxylamine by
hydrazobenzene. The quantitative reduction reaction enables us
to identify and assign all NMR peaks. Due to simplicity and
convenience, the present method would be very useful for
characterization of newly synthesized C60 nitroxide derivatives.
We have also demonstrated the use of the endo-H2 signal from
the H2@fullerene to simultaneously monitor and study the
relaxation of mixtures of the nitroxides and hydroxylamines.
The authors thank the National Science Foundation for its
generous support through Grant CHE 07-17518.
*RNOH + RNO = *RNO + RNOH
where the star (*) simply indicates molecules containing the
nucleus of interest that would be affected by the HAT process.
This reaction has been shown to occur with other hydroxyl-
amine/nitroxide pairs15 and may be sufficiently fast under some
conditions to produce line broadening in the hydroxylamine.16
Although analogous broadening of the RNOH peaks was
too small to be measured, the effect on T1 may be described in
terms of a classic chemical exchange between two sites with
different T1’s. In this case the T1 of the peak of interest,
RNOH, is ca. 8 times as long as that of the RNO peak,
corresponding to 1/T1 values for the endo-H2 of 6.5 sÀ1 and
50 sÀ1, respectively. The corresponding 1/T1 value for the
methyl group of RNOH is 1.4 sÀ1, and that for the RNO
methyl group is presumably much larger because of the
expected much larger dipolar and scalar interactions between
the methyl protons and unpaired electron in H2@1. This is
consistent with the fact that the corresponding peak is too
broad to be seen by high resolution NMR (Fig. S1a, ESIw).
Under these conditions, following the inversion pulse of the
T1 measurement procedure, the RNOH peak exchanges
magnetization with an almost fully relaxed RNO peak. It is
easily shown14 that in this case the recovery of the RNOH
peak is essentially exponential with an effective relaxation rate
given by
Notes and references
1 P. P. Borbat, A. J. Costa-Filho, K. A. Earle, J. K. Moscicki and
J. H. Freed, Science, 2001, 291, 266.
2 J. P. Blinco, K. E. Fairfull-Smith, B. J. Morrow and S. E. Bottle,
Aust. J. Chem., 2011, 64, 373.
3 F. Arena, F. Bullo, F. Conti, C. Corvaja, M. Maggini, M. Prato
and G. Scorrano, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 789.
4 C. Corvaja, M. Maggini, M. Prato, G. Scorrano and M. Venzin,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 8857.
5 E. Sartori, A. Toffoletti, C. Corvaja and L. Garlaschelli, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 2001, 105, 10776.
6 T. D. Lee and J. F. W. Keana, J. Org. Chem., 1975, 40, 3145.
7 A. D. Malievskii and A. B. Shapiro, Kinet. Catal., 2005, 46, 472.
8 M. Mazzoni, L. Franco, A. Ferrarini, C. Corvaja, G. Zordan,
G. Scorrano and M. Maggini, Liq. Cryst., 2002, 29, 203.
9 J. Nossal, R. K. Saini, L. B. Alemany, M. Meier and W. E. Billups,
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2001, 4167.
10 A. A. Bobko, I. A. Kirilyuk, I. A. Grigor’ev, J. L. Zweier and
V. V. Khramtsov, Free Radical Biol. Med., 2007, 42, 404.
11 Y. Li, X. Lei, R. G. Lawler, Y. Murata, K. Komatsu and
N. J. Turro, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2010, 1, 2135.
12 Preliminary analysis (ESIw) of the shifts and widths of the endo H2
peaks in Fig. 3 indicates that there is no detectable contact
interaction between the protons and unpaired electron and a negligible
contribution of scalar relaxation to the nitroxide linewidths. The
observed chemical shift difference between the endo-H2 in the nitroxide
and hydroxylamine must therefore arise primarily from differences in
shielding of the nuclei in the slightly different electronic environments.
13 E. Sartori, M. Ruzzi, N. J. Turro, K. Komatsu, Y. Murata,
R. G. Lawler and A. L. Buchachenko, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
130, 2221.
1/T1 = 1/T10 + R1,dd [RNO] + kHAT[RNO]
where 1/T10 is the relaxation rate when the concentration
[RNO] is zero; R1,dd, is the intermolecular dipolar contribution
that may be estimated to be the value for H2@3.
Using the above method, the resulting second order rate
constants, kHAT, for the endo and exo-protons of the H2@1
hydroxylamine, obtained by subtracting the corresponding
values of R1 for H2@3 from those for H2@1, are estimated
to be 584 Æ 78 and 431 Æ 14 MÀ1sÀ1, respectively (Fig. 4 and 5;
error estimate 1 standard deviation). The values are statistically
equal, as expected for protons in the same exchanging species.
The values themselves are near the upper range of values for
such HAT reactions15 and are similar to those obtained when
an intermediate complex has been postulated.16 The presence of
a complex in the present case would also be consistent with the
14 J. Schotland and J. S. Leigh, J. Magn. Reson., 1983, 51, 48.
15 A. Wu, E. A. Mader, A. Datta, D. A. Hrovat, W. T. Borden and
J. M. Mayer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 11985.
16 R. W. Kreilick and S. I. Weissman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966,
88, 2645.
17 L. Banci, I. Bertini and C. Luchinat, Nuclear and Electronic
Relaxation, VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1991.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 12527–12529 12529