ring-opening reactions of nitrocyclopropane carboxylates,
typically metal catalysts and/or elevated reaction tempera-
tures are required to generate high yields of product; no
organocatalytic variant has been reported. The most effi-
cient Lewis acid catalyst was found to be nickel perchlo-
rate, while many other Lewis acids caused undesired
rearrangement of the nitrocyclopropane to the isoxazoline
N-oxide.10e Prior work taking advantage of urea activation
of nitroalkenes for conjugate addition reactions did pro-
vide a starting point for the support of our studies, yet at
the onset of our investigations it remained unclear if a
HBD would operate as a strong enough catalyst to activate
a nitrocyclopropane for ring-opening.11 To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first study dedicated toward ring-
opening reactions of activated cyclopropanes using a HBD
catalyst.
Scheme 1
Studies commenced with the treatment of racemic
nitrocyclopropane carboxylate 4a with a catalytic amount
of boronate urea 6 in the presence of aniline (Scheme 1).
Gratifyingly, 5a was isolated in 87% yield as a 1:1 mixture
of diastereomers after 48 h at 23 °C in methylene chloride.
In addition to enhanced activity, boronate ureas are read-
ily prepared from commercially available materials and
benefit from several tunable parameters (e.g., Lewis acid,
ligand) that can be easily altered to facilitate the engineer-
ing of a catalyst with optimal performance for a particular
reaction.4,12,13 A direct comparison of boronate urea 6 to
conventional urea 7 demonstrated the benefit of internal
Lewis acid activation on the activity of the catalyst (87% vs
67% yields). On the basis of literature precedent involving
urea activation of nitroalkenes, it is proposed that the
catalyst may operate through hydrogen bond association
of 6 with the nitro group of 4a to generate intermediate 8,
a species in which the cyclopropane is activated for attack.2,14
With the initial bond-forming process established, the limits
of the reaction with respect to the nitrogen nucleophile
were put to the test (Table 1). The reaction was found to
be tolerant of anilines containing both electron-donating
and electron-withdrawing substituents. 4-Methoxyaniline
as a nucleophile gave rise to 90% 5b with 10 mol % 6
(entry 2). The less electron rich 4-bromoaniline rendered
the reaction more sluggish, affording 58% 5c after 48 h
(entry 3). Nitrogen heterocycles were found to be well
tolerated as nucleophiles in the reaction system. The addi-
tion of morpholine to 4a yielded 95% 5d. Nucleophilic
addition of piperidine was more challenging, although a
78% yield of desired product 5e was obtained (entry 5).
Indoline operated well in the ring-opening of 4a to afford
99% 5f (entry 6). Phenylhydrazine was also well tolerated
in the reaction, affording a near-quantitative yield of 5g
new bond-forming processes and set out to develop bo-
ronate urea catalyzed ring-opening reactions of nitrocy-
clopropanes (3).7 Investigations exploring reactions of
activated cyclopropanes typically focus on the reactivity
of 1,1-diestercyclopropanes.8,9 Reactions of nitro-
cyclopropanes are significantly less studied and warrant
further development due to the value of products contain-
ing the nitro group, as it can be easily converted into useful
nitrogen functionalities often found in bioactive targets.10
Indeed, the highly useful nature of the products obtained
from the ring-opening of nitrocyclopropanes was the basis
of our initial attraction to this area. We envisioned taking
advantage of boronate ureas (6) for the activation of
nitrocyclopropane carboxylates (4) toward attack by an
amine nucleophile to access γ-amino R-nitro ester prod-
ucts (5), valuable building blocks for the construction of
drug targets. In the few existing reports of nucleophilic
(6) For additional recent, interesting examples of alternate strategies
to access hydrogen bond donors with enhanced activity see: (a) Robak,
M. T.; Trincado, M.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15110.
(b) Ganesh, M.; Seidel, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16464.
(7) For a review on nitrocyclopropanes see: Averina, E. B.; Yashin,
N. V.; Kuznetsova, T. S.; Zefirov, N. S. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2009, 78, 887.
(8) For reviews on the reactivity of activated cyclopropanes, see:
(a) Carson, C. A.; Kerr, M. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3051. (b) Rubina,
M.; Gevorgyan, V. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3117. (c) Yu, M.; Pagenkopf,
B. L. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 321. (d) Reissig, H. U.; Zimmer, R. Chem. Rev.
2003, 103, 1151. (e) Burrit, A.; Coron, J. M.; Steel, P. J. Trends Org. Chem
1993, 4, 517. (f) Wong, H. N. C.; Hon, M. Y.; Tse, C. W.; Yip, Y. C.;
Tanko, J.; Hudlicky, T. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 165. (g) Danishefsky, S. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 66.
(9) For recent examples of Lewis acid catalyzed reactions of
1,1-diestercyclopropanes see: (a) Jackson, S. K.; Karadeolian, A.; Driega,
A. B.; Kerr, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4196. (b) Perreault, C.;
Goudreau, S. R.; Zimmer, L. E.; Charette, A. B. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 689.
(c) Pohlhaus, P. D.; Johnson, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16014.
(d) Magolan, J.; Kerr, M. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4561.
(11) For intramolecular H-bond activation of cyclopropanes see:
Emmett, M. R.; Kerr, M. A. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4180.
(12) For early work demonstrating that diaryl ureas with trifluoromethyl
substituents have enhanced activity, see: (a) Schreiner, P. R.; Wittkopp, A.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 217. (b) Wittkopp, A.; Schreiner, P. R. Chem.;Eur. J.
2003, 9, 407.
(13) A variety of ureas were surveyed as catalysts in this process. See
Supporting Information for more on the catalyst structure.
(14) Participation of the ester in the activation of intermediate 8 has
not been ruled out at this time.
(10) For reports of ring-opening reactions of nitrocyclopropanes see:
(a) Vettiger, T.; Seebach, D. Liebigs Ann. Chem 1990, 195. (b) Seebach,
D.; Haener, R.; Vettiger, T. Helv. Chim. Acta 1987, 70, 1507. (c) Wurz,
R. P.; Charette, A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2313. (d) Budynina, E. M.;
Ivanova, O. A.; Averina, E. B.; Kuznetsova, T. S.; Sefirov, N. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 647. (e) Lifchits, O.; Charette, A. B. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 2809. (f) Lifchits, O.; Alberico, D.; Zakharian, I.;
Charette, A. B. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6838.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 2, 2012
445