until a molecular area of B50 A2 per molecule is reached, when
an increase in pressure was observed. The slope suggests that
the film reached a condensed phase at that point. At B40 A2
per molecule (corresponding to the cross-sectional area of
5 B42 A2 in the crystal structure), the change of the slope
represents the reorganization of the film structure, indicating
controlled collapse of the monolayer towards multilayers
formation. As molecular chalice 5 showed a high selectivity
for sodium cations in solution, a solution of 5 was spread on a
10 mM NaCl subphase from a 1 mM solution in chloroform
(Fig. 2). The isotherm shows a significant shift to higher
molecular areas, however, when higher volumes of 5 were
spread on the 10 mM NaCl subphase, i.e. isotherms starting at
40 A2/molecule, the isotherms are identical in both the
presence and absence of NaCl. This suggests that the molecular
chalice may complex sodium in the monolayer state i.e. before
the first reorganization transition but upon spreading into a
multilayer, either the sodium cation is not incorporated in the
layers or does not affect their organization. Having said this,
the same isotherms were obtained when spread on a 10 mM
KCl subphase, which indicates that the behaviour of 5 at the
air–water interface is not affected by the nature of the cation.
Thus complexation may not induce a conformation change of
the monolayer at the interface and counterions may additionally
interact non-specifically with the chalice to expand the mono-
layer. BAM was utilized to characterize the morphology of
films of 5 during the course of compression in the absence of
ions (see ESIw, Fig. S4). High molecular areas showed large
regions of material which was already aggregated. Once the
pressure began to increase, the film appears to comprise a
uniform distribution of aggregates of varying heights and/or
optical properties. Only once the plateau is reached does it
appear that the gaseous phase is completely removed and the
aggregates have coalesced.
film deposited at 5 mN mꢁ1 on silicon. Seven ellipsometric
thicknesses at different locations of the LB film were measured,
giving an average of 12.3 ꢀ 0.2 A. Thus, this result suggests
that the molecular chalices form a monolayer, knowing that
the distance from the crown ether moiety and the phenyl
groups in the crystal structure is 12.86 A (Fig. 1). AFM was
used to investigate the structure of the Langmuir–Blodgett film
when deposited on a mica surface. When transferred during the
first regime compression at p o 10 mN mꢁ1 at 25 1C, a film is
formed with a height of 12.1 ꢀ 0.4 A (measured at seven
different pinhole locations), corresponding to the formation
of a monolayer (Fig. 3). When the films are transferred at
p 4 20 mN mꢁ1 at 25 1C the underlying monolayer is more
continuous and uniform (with the absence of pinholes and less
height variation). Furthermore the observed aggregates are
26.1 ꢀ 0.4 A above the background monolayer, indicating the
formation of a double layer.
In conclusion we have synthesized and characterized a
molecular chalice able to selectively bind Na+ cations. This
unique molecular recognition property should be useful for
future technology, for example in creating new chemical
sensors and in fabricating two-dimensional molecular lattices
comprising multiple functional units for molecular separations
and water depollution.
Notes and references
1 (a) F. Hof, S. L. Craig, C. Nuckolls and J. Rebek, Jr., Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1488–1508; (b) A. E. Rowan, J. A. A.
W. Elemans and R. J. M. Nolte, Acc. Chem. Res., 1999, 32, 995;
(c) P. E. J. Sanderson, J. D. Kilburn and W. C. Still, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1989, 111, 8314; (d) W. Lee, S. Samal, N. Selvapalam,
H. J. Kim and K. Kim, Acc. Chem. Res., 2003, 36, 621.
2 (a) Z.-G. Wang, B.-H. Zhou, Y.-F. Chen, G.-D. Yin, Y.-T. Li,
A.-X. Wu and L. Isaacs, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 4502; (b) K. Kim,
N. Selvapalam, H. K. Young, M. P. Kyeng, D. Kim and J. Kim,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 267; (c) J. Lagona, P. Mukhopadhyay,
S. Chakrabarti and L. Isaacs, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005,
44, 4844.
3 (a) J. W. H. Smeets, R. P. Sijbesma, F. G. M. Niele, A. L. Spek, W.
J. J. Smeets and R. J. M. Nolte, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 928;
(b) L. Isaacs, D. Witt and J. C. Fettinger, Chem. Commun., 1999,
2549; (c) A. Sygula, F. R. Fronczek, R. Sygula, P. W. Rabideau
and M. M. Olmstead, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 3842.
4 P. E. Stott, J. S. Bradshaw and W. W. Parish, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1980, 102, 4810.
In order to confirm this organization, spectroscopic ellipsometry
was used to determine the thickness of a Langmuir–Blodgett
5 H. Kuhn and D. Mobius, Monolayer assemblies, in Investigations
of Surfaces and Interfaces, ed. B. W. Rossiter and R. C. Baetzold,
Wiley, New York, 2nd edn, 1993, vol. IXB.
6 S. P. Gromov and M. V. Alfimov, Russ. Chem. Bull., 1997, 46, 611.
7 (a) J. W. H. Smeets, L. van Dalen, V. E. M. Kaats-Richter and
R. J. M. Nolte, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 454; (b) R. P. Sijbesma and
R. J. M. Nolte, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 3122; (c) H. K. A.
C. Coolen, H. Engelkamp, J. N. H. Reek, A. H. Priem, P. N. W.
M. van Leeuwen and R. J. M. Nolte, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas,
2010, 114, 65.
8 R. P. Sijbesma and R. J. M. Nolte, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas,
2010, 112, 643.
9 K. Connors, Binding Constants. The Measurement of Molecular
Complex Stability, Wiley, New York, 1987.
10 A. H. Bond, M. L. Dietz and R. Chiarizia, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
2000, 39, 3442.
11 B. G. Cox and H. Schneider, Coordination and Transport Properties of
Macrocyclic Compounds in Solution, Elsevier, 1992.
12 P. Dapporto, P. Paoli, I. Matija and L. Tusek-Bosic, Inorg. Chim.
Acta, 1996, 252, 383–389.
13 (a) D. Vollhardt, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 1996, 64, 143;
(b) D. Hoenig and D. Moebius, J. Phys. Chem., 1991, 95, 4590;
(c) S. Henon and J. Meunier, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 1991, 62, 936.
Fig. 3 AFM images of the film transferred onto mica.
12836 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 12834–12836
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011