CO and methoxy(methyl)amine13 and thereby providing
the Weinreb amide 14 (98%). Treatment of compound 14
with LiAlH4 then afforded the corresponding allylic alco-
hol 15 (89%).14 Hydrolytic cleavage of the acetonide
residue associated with this last compound was achieved
using acidified DOWEX-50resin inaqueousmethanol and
the resulting triol 16 (70%) selectively protected as the
mono-TBS ether 17 (80%) using TBS-Cl in the presence
of imidazole. Selective oxidation of the hydroxyl group
remote from the bridgehead methyl group within com-
pound 17 could be achieved using the sterically demanding
oxammonium salt obtained by the p-TsOH-promoted
disproportionation of 4-acetamido-TEMPO12 and by such
means the acyloin 18 was obtained in 92% yield. The
readily derived benzoate 19 (96%) was then subjected to
reaction with samarium diiodide15 and thus affording,
through a reductive deoxygenation process, the target
bicyclo[2.2.2]oct-4-en-1-one 20. This was obtained in
98% yield.
The alcohol 10 produced through hydroboration/oxida-
tion of alkene 9 as shown in Scheme 1 could also be
converted into the substrate 20 required for the pivotal
photochemical rearrangement reaction. Thus, as shown in
Scheme 2, oxidation of compound 10 to the corresponding
ketone 21 (87%) followed by reaction of the derived
enolate with Mander’s reagent16 afforded the β-hydroxy-
R,β-unsaturated ester 22 (73%) that was readily converted
into the corresponding triflate 23 (72%)17 or diethylphos-
phate 24 (78%) by treatment with triflic anhydride/
Figure 1. Structure of compound 1.
The synthetic sequence leading to the substrate re-
quired for the pivotal 1,3-acyl rearrangement is shown in
Scheme 1 and starts with the high-pressure promoted
DielsꢀAlder reaction between the enzymatically de-
rived and enantiomerically pure cis-1,2-dihydrocatechol
29 and cyclopent-2-en-1-one (3). The adduct 410 (70%)
so-formed was converted into the corresponding acet-
onide 510 (98%) under standard conditions and this was,
in turn, transformed into the corresponding gem-di-
methylated derivative 610 (95%) using established tech-
niques. Deletion of the carbonyl moiety contained
within the last compound involved its initial lithium
aluminum hydride-promoted reduction to the correspond-
ing alcohol 710 (99% of an 11:1 mixture of epimers), the
xanthate ester derivative, 8,10 of which was subjected to a
BartonꢀMcCombie deoxygenation reaction using tri-n-
butyltin hydride and thus providing alkene 910 (50% from
7). Hydroboration/oxidation of the last compound using
the borane-dimethylsulfide complex then alkaline hydro-
gen peroxide afforded a mixture of the regioisomeric and
chromatographically separable alcohols 10 (39%) and 11
(36%). Various attempts to improve the regioselectivity of
this reaction using other hydroborating agents failed.
Compound 11 was oxidized to the corresponding ketone
12 (91%)11 using the oxammonium salt derived from 4-N-
AcetylTEMPO12 and this was, in turn, converted into the
corresponding nonaflate 13 (90%) under standard condi-
tions. Compound 13 was readily engaged in a Pd0-
catalyzed carboxyamination reaction using a combination of
€
Hunig’s base or ClPO(OEt)2/triethylamine, respectively.
Reaction of the former product with formic acid in the
presence of a Pd0 catalyst and tri-n-butylamine17 or of the
latter product with lithium dimethylcuprate18 afforded the
deoxygenatedester25in85%and77%yields, respectively.
Finally, reduction of compound 25 with DIBAL-H af-
forded the allylic alcohol 15 (95%) that could be converted
intocompound 20bythe means definedinthe later partsof
Scheme 1.
The pivotal 1,3-acyl migration reaction was carried out
(Scheme 3) by irradiating a dichloromethane solution of
substrate 20 with a high-pressure mercury lamp for 1.5 h at
0 °C and thereby generating the desired product 26 (23%
or 57% brsm). This was accompanied by small quantities
of cyclopropane 27 (5% or 12% brsm), diene 28 (7% or
17% brsm) and the oxa-di-π-methane rearrangement19
product 29 (3% or 7% brsm). The first two of these
byproducts, viz. compounds 27 and 28, presumably arise
(9) Bon, D. J.-Y. D.; Lee, B.; Banwell, M. G.; Cade, I. A. Chim. Oggi
2012, 30 (No. 5, Chiral Technologies Supplement), 22.
(10) Banwell, M. G.; Edwards, A. J.; Harfoot, G. J.; Jolliffe, K. A.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 535.
(11) The structures of compounds 12 and 1 were confirmed by single-
crystal X-ray analysis (CCDC Nos. 919145 and 919146, respectively).
Details are provided in the Supporting Information.
(12) This protocol is based on one first described by Ma and Bobbitt:
Ma, Z.; Bobbitt, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6110.
(13) Hung, D. T.; Nerenberg, J. B.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 11054.
(14) In the original synthetic plan this Weinreb amide was to be
subjected to a late-stage (and direct) reduction to the corresponding
aldehyde (and thus installing this moiety as required in target 1).
However, it transpired that this amide residue is converted into the
corresponding demethoxylated amide upon exposure to samarium
diiodide.
(15) Molander, G. A.; Hahn, G. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1135.
(16) Crabtree, S. R.; Chu, W. L. A.; Mander, L. N. Synlett 1990, 169.
(17) Ramachandran, S. A.; Kharul, R. K.; Marque, S.; Soucy, P.;
^
Jacques, F.; Chenevert, R.; Deslongchamps, P. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
71, 6149.
(18) For examples of the organocuprate-mediated reductions of enol
phosphates, see: (a) Ishihara, T.; Maekawa, T.; Yamasaki, Y.; Ando, T.
J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 300. (b) Paquette, L. A.; Dahnke, K.; Doyon, J.;
He, W.; Wyant, K.; Friedrich, D. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6199.
(19) For a very recent review of the oxa-di-π-methane rearrange-
ment, see:Rao, V. J.; Srinivas, K. In CRC Handbook of Organic
€
Photochemistry and Photobiology, 3rd ed; Griesbeck, A. G., Oelgemoller,
M., Ghetti, F., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2012; Chapter 22,
pp 527ꢀ548.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 8, 2013
1935