Synthesis, Characterization and Antibacterial Activity
1558
thiazole15 (0.1 mol, 17.6 g) in methanol (35 mL). The resulting solution was refluxed for 3 h at 64 ˚C.
Solid compound precipitate out is desire Schiff base. Filtered and washed with cold methanol and
dried under vacuum oven at 50 ˚C. Yield: 29 g (75%). M.P. = 216 ˚C. Anal. Calcd. For C22H20N4OS:
C, 68.02; H, 5.19; N, 14.42; S, 8.25. Found: C, 67.94; H, 5.12; N, 14.32; S, 8.26. 1H NMR: (400
MHz, CDCl3 δ =14.10 (s, 1H, OH), 7.33 (s, 1H, Thiazole ring), 7.22-7.85 (m, 9H, 2Ar), 2.96 (s, 3H,
CH3), 2.47 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.31 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR: (400 ΜΗz, CDCl3δ =165.18 (C=N, 3C),
161.02 (C=N, 10C), 159.56 (C-OH, 14C), 153.08 (C=C, 2C), 147.71 (C=N, 13C), 136.20, 134.65,
133.96, 129.49, 128.94, 128.73, 128.62, 127.89, 126.27, 126.14, 120.87, 119.54, (12C, 2Ar), 108.51
(C=C, 1C), 103.60 (C=C, 12C), 21.12 (CH3, 15C), 18.47(CH3, 22C), 17.94 (CH3, 11C).
2-(3-Chloro-phenyl)-5-methyl-4-[1-(4-pheny-thiazol-2-ylimino)-ethyl]-2H-pyrazol-3-ol (L1)
A hot solution of 4-acetyl-1-(3’-chlorophenyl)-3-methyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one16 (0.1 mol, 25 g)
in methanol (50 mL) was slowly added drop wise to a hot solution of 2-amino-4-phenyl-
thiazole (0.1 mol, 17.6 g) in methanol (35 mL). The resulting solution was refluxed for 3 h
at 64 ˚C. Solid compound precipitate out is desire Schiff base. Filtered and washed with cold
methanol and dried under vacuum oven at 50 ˚C. Yield: 32.6 g (80%). M.P. = 174 ˚C. Anal.
Calcd. For C21H17ClN4OS: C, 61.68; H, 4.19; N, 13.70; S, 7.84. Found: C, 57.59; H, 3.97; N,
12.77; S, 8.79. 1H NMR: 400 ΜΗz, CDCl3δ =13.93 (s, 1H, OH), 7.22 (s, 1H, Thiazole ring),
7.13-8.09 (m, 9H, 2Ar), 2.93 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.45 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR: (400 ΜΗz, CDCl3
δ =165.55 (C=N, 3C), 161.42 (C=N, 10C), 159.26 (C-OH, 14C), 153.18 (C=C, 2C), 148.35
(C=N, 13C), 139.79, 137.48, 134.70, 133.87, 128.94, 128.69, 126.28, 124.79, 119.17, 117.03
(12C, 2Ar), 108.76 (C=C, 1C), 103.40 (C=C, 12C), 18.49(CH3, 11C), 17.94 (CH3, 15C).
Synthesis and characterization of metal complexes
For the preparation of complexes, an aqueous solution of metal acetate (0.05 M) and 1:4 dioxane
solution of ligand (0.05 M) were mixed in presence of acetate buffer (pH=6.5) and the mixture was
digested on sand bath for 30 minutes, cooled and filtered the precipitate and then washed with water
and then methanol to remove excess metal ions and unreacted Schiff bases respectively.
All the complexes are colored, non-hygroscopic and stable solids. They are insoluble in
water, sparingly soluble in all the common organic solvents but fairly soluble in DMF. Physical
properties of the complexes are given in Table 1. The molar conductance of the complexes is in
the range of 7.68 to 15.32 ohm-1 cm2 mol-1 indicates their non-electrolytic nature.
The metal contents in all the complexes were determined gravimetrically as MoO3 by
the method reported by Mohanti et al17. Carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen were determined
micro analytically. Molar conductivities in 10-3 M DMF were measured using “Equiptronics
EQ-660 digital conductivity meter” and a calibrated conductivity cell at room temperature.
Magnetic susceptibilities of the complexes were measured at room temperature (30 ˚C) using
Gouy balance (Sartorius, semi-micro, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, India).
Results and Discussion
Mass spectra
Mass spectra provide a vital clue for elucidation of compounds. The mass spectrum of
ligand L shows the molecular ion peak at m/z = 389.18 (M+), confirms the theoretical
molecular weight i.e. 388.49 of ligand L and spectrum of ligand L1 shows the molecular ion
peak at m/z = 409.15 (M+) and the isotopic peak at m/z = 411.16 due to 35Cl and 37Cl
isotopes of ligand L1. In both the spectra the molecular ion peak is base peak and the
intensity of these peaks reflects the stability and abundance of the ions.