Anion-Sensitive Terpyridine Derivative and Its Platinum Chloride Complex
terpyridine (ttpy-CHO) were synthesized according to literature
procedures.[10] The target compounds were characterized by 1H
NMR spectroscopy, high-resolution mass spectrometry (ESI-MS),
and elemental analysis. 1H NMR spectra were measured with a
Varian Oxford-400 VNMR spectrometer. ESI-MS analyses were
performed with a Bruker BioTOF III mass spectrometer. Elemental
analyses were conducted by NuMega Resonance Laboratories, Inc.
in San Diego, California.
recorded upon addition of [Bu4N]AcO and [Bu4N]H2PO4 and the
respective Job plots.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation
( CAREER CHE-0449598).
Compound 1: Compounds 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (40.0 mg,
0.20 mmol) and ttpy-CHO (67.0 mg, 0.20 mmol) were dissolved in
6 mL and 30 mL of ethanol/H3PO4 (ethanol/H3PO4 = 2:1), respec-
tively. These two solutions were mixed and heated at reflux for 2 h.
A red precipitate formed and was collected by filtration, then
washed with ethanol, water, ethanol, and ether, and finally dried in
air. The crude product was purified by recrystallization from DMF
to yield crystalline orange needles (66.0 mg, yield: 65%). 1H NMR
([D6]DMSO): δ = 8.86 (s, 1 H), 8.78 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 8.75 (d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 8.74 (s, 2 H), 8.66 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 8.40 (d,
J = 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.12 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.04 (m, 4 H), 7.99 (t,
J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.51 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H) ppm. ESI-HRMS: calcd.
for [C28H19N7O4 + Na]+ 540.1391; found 540.1388. C28H19N7O4
(517.50): calcd. C 64.99, H 3.70, N 18.95; found C 64.60, H 4.03,
N 18.72.
[1] a) J.-M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Per-
spective, VCH, Weinheim, 1995; b) J. W. Steed, J. L. Atwood,
Supramolecular Chemistry: A Concise Introduction, Wiley,
Chichester, 2000.
[2] a) C. R. Cooper, N. Spencer, T. D. James, Chem. Commun.
1998, 1365–1366; b) C. B. Black, B. Andrioletti, A. C. Try, C.
Ruiperez, J. L. Sessler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10438–
10439.
[3] For recent reviews on anion receptors, see: a) R. Martínez-
Míñez, F. Sancenón, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4419–4476; b) P. D.
Beer, P. A. Gale, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 502; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 486–516; c) S. L. Wiskur, H. Ait-Haddou,
E. V. Anslyn, J. J. Lavigne, Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 963–972;
d) “Anion Coordination Chemistry II”, P. A. Gale (Ed.), Co-
ord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 2917–3244.
[4] a) E. J. Cho, J. W. Moon, S. W. Ko, J. Y. Lee, S. K. Kim, J.
Yoon, K. C. Nam, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12376–12377;
b) T. Mizuno, W.-H. Wei, L. R. Eller, J. L. Sessler, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 1134–1135; c) L. Zhou, X. Zhang, S. K. Wu,
Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 850–851; d) J.-L. Fillaut, J. Andries, L.
Toupet, J.-P. Desvergne, Chem. Commun. 2005, 2924–2926.
[5] C. Bhaumik, S. Das, D. Saha, S. Dutta, S. Baitalik, Inorg.
Chem. 2010, 49, 5049–5062.
Compound 2: Compound
1 (51.7 mg, 0.10 mmol) and Pt-
(DMSO)2Cl2 (42.2 mg, 0.10 mmol) were dissolved in CH2Cl2
(50 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
for 1 day. An orange solid formed and was collected by filtration,
washed with CH2Cl2, and dried in air. The reaction afforded
62.0 mg of pure product (Yield: 55%). 1H NMR ([D6]DMSO): δ =
9.02 (s, 2 H), 8.96 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 8.88 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H),
8.86 (s, 1 H), 8.75 (s, 1 H), 8.56 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 8.38 (d, J =
9.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.29 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2 H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.99
(m, 4 H) ppm. ESI-HRMS: calcd. for [C28H19N7O4PtCl]+ 747.0829;
found 747.0808. C28H19ClN7O4Pt·0.5PtCl4·2.5CH2Cl2 (1128.8):
calcd. C 32.45, H 2.14, N 8.69; found C 32.33, H 2.36, N 8.85.
[6] a) Z.-H. Lin, S.-J. Ou, C.-Y. Duan, B.-G. Zhang, Z.-P. Bai,
Chem. Commun. 2006, 624–626; b) Z.-H. Lin, Y.-G. Zhao, C.-
Y. Duan, B.-G. Zhang, Z.-P. Bai, Dalton Trans. 2006, 3678–
3684.
[7] Y. Fan, Y.-M. Zhu, F. R. Dai, L.-Y. Zhang, Z.-N. Chen, Dalton
Trans. 2007, 3885–3892.
[8] Y. Sun, S. Wang, Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 4394–4404.
[9] a) K. M.-C. Wong, V. W.-W. Yam, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007,
251, 2477–2488; b) K. M.-C. Wong, W.-S. Tang, X.-X. Lu, N.
Zhu, V. W.-W. Yam, Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1492–1498; c)
M. A. R. Meier, U. S. Schubert, Chem. Commun. 2005, 4610–
4612; d) H.-S. Lo, S.-K. Yip, K. M.-C. Wong, N. Zhu, V. W.-
W. Ya m , Organometallics 2006, 25, 3537–3540; e) Z. Ji, Y. Li,
W. Sun, J. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 694, 4140–4145; f) X. Han,
L.-Z. Wu, G. Si, J. Pan, Q.-Z. Yang, L.-P. Zhang, C.-H. Tung,
Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 1231–1239; g) Q.-Z. Yang, L.-Z. Wu,
H. Zhang, B. Chen, Z.-X. Wu, L.-P. Zhang, C.-H. Tung, Inorg.
Chem. 2004, 43, 5195–5197; h) K. M.-C. Wong, W.-S. Tang,
B. W.-K. Chu, N. Zhu, V. W.-W. Yam, Organometallics 2004,
23, 3459–3465; i) Q.-Z. Yang, Q.-X. Tong, L.-Z. Wu, Z.-X. Wu,
L.-P. Zhang, C.-H. Tung, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 1948–1954.
[10] a) P. Bonhôte, J.-E. Moser, R. Humphry-Baker, N. Vlacho-
poulos, S. M. Zakeeruddin, L. Walder, M. Grätzel, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1324–1336; b) J.-P. Collin, V. Heitz, J.-
P. Sauvage, Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 5977–5980.
Photophysical and Anion-Sensing Studies: UV/Vis spectra were
measured with a UV-2501 spectrophotometer in 1-cm quartz cu-
vettes. The concentration of the solutions of 1 and 2 in DMSO for
sensing measurements was 4.0ϫ 10–5 molL–1. For Job plot mea-
surements, this represents the total concentration of F– and com-
pound in solution. The steady-state emission spectra were acquired
with a SPEX fluorolog-3 fluorometer/phosphorometer. The triplet
transient difference absorption (TA) spectra and triplet-excited-
state lifetimes were measured in degassed DMSO solutions with
an Edinburgh LP920 laser flash photolysis spectrometer. The third
harmonic output (355 nm) of a Nd:YAG laser (Quantel Brilliant,
pulse width ca. 4.1 ns, repetition rate set at 1 Hz) was used as the
excitation source. Each sample was purged with Ar for 30 min be-
fore the measurement. The triplet-excited-state absorption coeffi-
cient (εT1–Tn) was determined by the singlet depletion method,[12]
in which the optical density changes at the minimum of the bleach-
ing band (ΔODS) and at the maximum of the positive band (ΔODT)
in the TA spectrum, and the ground-state molar extinction coeffi-
cient (εs) at the wavelength of the bleaching band minimum are
used to calculate the εT1–Tn according to the following equation.[12]
[11] a) K. A. Zachariasse, M. Grobys, Th. von der Haar, A.
Hebecker, Yu. V. IlЈichev, Y.-B. Jiang, O. Morawski, W. Kühnle,
J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 1996, 102, 59–70; b) K. A.
Zachariasse, M. Grobys, T. von der Haar, A. Hebecker, Yu. V.
IlЈichev, O. Morawski, I. Rückert, W. Kühnle, J. Photochem.
Photobiol. A: Chem. 1997, 105, 373–383.
[12] I. Carmichael, G. L. Hug, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1986, 15,
1–250.
[13] M. Boiocchi, L. D. Boca, D. E. Gómez, L. Fabbrizzi, M. Licch-
elli, E. Monzani, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16507–16514.
Received: May 25, 2011
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): UV/Vis absorption spectra of DMSO solutions of 1 and 2
Published Online: October 10, 2011
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 4964–4969
© 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjic.org
4969