J. L. Chiara, ꢅ. Lꢆpez-Arbeloa, I. Garcꢃa-Moreno et al.
stants in hertz (Hz), and assignment. Proton and carbon-13 assignments
are based on DQ-COSY, HSQC, and HMBC correlation experiments.
Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed with Merck silica gel
60 F254 plates and Merck aluminum oxide neutral 60 F254 plates. Chroma-
tograms were visualized using UV light of wavelengths 254/365 nm. For
the detection of azides, the chromatograms were first dipped in a 1% (w/
v) solution of Ph3P in EtOAc, dried at RT, then dipped in a 1% or 5%
(w/v) solution of ninhydrin in 95% aqueous EtOH, and finally charred
on a hot plate.[30] Column chromatography was performed with Merck
neutral aluminum oxide or Merck silica gel, grade 60, 230–400 mesh.
Mass spectra were recorded on a MALDI Voyager-DE PRO time-of-
flight (TOF) spectrometer (Applied Biosystems), using a 2,5-dihydroxy-
benzoic acid matrix, or on an Agilent/HP 1100 LC/MSD spectrometer
using ESI or APCI sources. Anhydrous solvents were prepared according
to standard methods by distillation over drying agents or by elution
through a Pure Solv column-drying system[31] from Innovative Technolo-
gy. All other solvents were of HPLC grade and were used as received.
All reactions were carried out under magnetic stirring and, if air- or
moisture-sensitive, in oven-dried glassware under argon. Microwave irra-
diation experiments were performed with a single-mode Discover System
from CEM Corporation, using standard Pyrex tubes (10 or 35 mL capaci-
ty) sealed with a rubber cap.
raphy (SiO2; hexane/EtOAc, 12:1 to 5:3) to recover excess starting mate-
rial 2 (113 mg, 94% recovery of excess 2 employed) and 5 as a red vis-
cous oil (15.1 mg, 82%). Rf =0.61 (hexane/EtOAc, 5:3); 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d=0.71–0.76 (m, 14H; Si-CH2CH2CH2), 0.83–0.98
(m, 2H; Si*CH2CH2CH2), 0.97 (t, 6H, J=7.55 Hz; CH3CH2), 1.34 (s, 6H;
CH3-C1, CH3-C7), 1.66–1.74 (m, 14H; SiCH2CH2CH2), 2.06–2.13 (m, 2H;
Si*CH2CH2CH2), 2.30 (q, 4H, J=7.51 Hz; CH2CH3), 2.54 (s, 6H; CH3-
C3, CH3-C5), 3.26 (td, 14H, J=6.83, 1.42 Hz; CH2N3), 4.43 (t, 2H, J=
7.11 Hz; CH2-N=N), 7.36 (d, 2H, JAB =8.43 Hz; 2ꢀCH phenyl), 7.97 (d,
2H,
JAB =8.43 Hz; 2ꢀCH phenyl), 7.86 ppm (s, 1H; 1,2,3-triazole);
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d=9.3 (SiCH2CH2CH2), 12.6 (CH3), 12.7
(CH3), 14.9 (CH3CH2), 17.3 (CH3CH2), 22.7 (SiCH2CH2CH2), 24.4
(Si*CH2CH2CH2), 52.8 (CH2-N=N), 53.5 (CH2N3), 120.1 (CH, 1,2,3-tria-
zole), 126.4 (CH, phenyl), 129.2 (CH, phenyl), 130.9, 131.3, 133.0, 135.9,
138.5, 139.8 (C in 1,2,3-triazole), 147.4, 154.1 ppm [Si*=silicon atom with
the (1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propyl substituent]; 29Si NMR: d=À66.92, À66.97,
À67.53 ppm (3:4:1 relative intensities); UV/Vis (EtOAc): lmax =523 nm
(e=47427 molÀ1 m3 cmÀ1); MS (API-ESI): m/z: 1493.3 [M+H]+, 1475.4
[MÀNH4+].
BDP dye 6: a) Synthesis of 1-butylazide: A solution of 1-bromobutane
(1.0 g, 7.5 mmol) and NaN3 (950 mg, 14.6 mmol) in DMF (15 mL) was
stirred for 15 h at 1208C. The mixture was then poured into water and
extracted three times with toluene (final concentration 0.04m assuming
the reaction to be quantitative), and the combined extracts were dried
(Na2SO4) and used without further purification. b) CuAAC reaction:
Materials: Pyrromethene 567 (laser grade, Exciton) with a purity >99%
(checked by spectroscopic and chromatographic methods) was used as re-
ceived. Solvents for laser studies were of spectroscopic grade (Merck, Al-
drich, or Sigma) and were used without purification. Linear and cross-
linked copolymers were obtained by copolymerization of methyl metha-
crylate (MMA) with different volumetric proportions of the monofunc-
tional fluorinated monomer 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methacrylate (TFMA)
and of methacryl-POSS (8MAPOSS cage mixture, from Hybrid Plastics).
All monomers were purchased from Aldrich. MMA was purified before
use, while TFMA and 8MAPOSS were used as received. 2,2’-Azobis(iso-
butyronitrile) (AIBN) (Acros) was used as a thermal initiator of poly-
merization. Azido-POSS 2 was prepared as described previously.[11] Cop-
[CuACHTUNGRTNEUNG(C186tren)]Br (11 mg, 0.006 mmol) and iPr2NEt (32 mL, 0.185 mmol)
were added to a solution of 1-butylazide in toluene (2.23 mL, 0.04m,
0.080 mmol) containing 4,4-difluoro-8-(4’-ethynylphenyl)-1,3,5,7-tetra-
methyl-2,6-diethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (3) (25 mg, 0.062 mmol)
under argon. After stirring for 3 h at 808C under microwave irradiation,
the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was pu-
rified by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 1:5) to afford 6
as a red crystalline powder (28 mg, 90%). Rf =0.44 (hexane/EtOAc, 5:3);
1
m.p. (from EtOAc): 232–2358C; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d=0.98 (t,
per(I) catalyst [Cu
(C186tren)]Br (C186tren=tris(2-dioctadecylaminoe-
6H, J=7.5 Hz; CH3CH2), 1.00 (t, 3H, J=7.3 Hz; CH
3ACHTUNGTREN(UNNG CH2)3N), 1.34 (s,
thyl)amine) was prepared according to described procedures.[16a]
6H; CH3-C1, CH3-C7), 1.37–1.49 (m, 2H; CH2A(CH2)2N), 1.88–2.04 (m,
CHTUNGTRENNUNG
2H; CH2CH2N), 2.31 (q, 4H, J=7.5 Hz; CH2CH3), 2.54 (s, 6H; CH3-C3,
CH3-C5), 4.44 (t, 2H, J=7.2 Hz; CH2N), 7.35 (d, 2H, JAB =8.3 Hz; CH
phenyl), 7.84 (s, 1H; 1,2,3-triazole), 7.97 ppm (d, 2H, JAB =8.3 Hz; CH
phenyl); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d=12.1 (CH2CH3), 12.7 (CH3-C1,
Compound 4: A solution of CuSO4·5H2O (2.5 mg, 0.010 mmol) and
sodium ascorbate (9 mg, 0.045 mmol) in water (0.6 mL) was added to a
solution of azido-POSS 2 (20 mg, 0.018 mmol) and 4,4-difluoro-8-(4’-ethy-
nylphenyl)-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-2,6-diethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene
(3)[32] (72 mg, 0.178 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (0.9 mL). After stirring for 4.5 h at
RT, a saturated aqueous solution of EDTA (1 mL) was added, the mix-
ture was vigorously stirred for 30 min, the phases were separated, and
the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3ꢀ3 mL). The organic
layers were combined, dried over Na2SO4, and the solvent was removed
under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by flash column
chromatography (hexane/EtOAc, 1:5) to afford 4 (54 mg, 70%) as a red
powder. M.p. (from CH2Cl2): 2908C (decomposition). Rf =0.75 (hexane/
EtOAc, 1:5); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d=0.68–0.75 (m, 16H; Si-
CH2CH2CH2), 0.93 (t, 48H, J=7.4 Hz; 16ꢀCH3CH2), 1.30 (s, 48H; 16ꢀ
CH3-C), 2.13–2.18 (m, 16H; SiCH2CH2CH2), 2.25 (q, 32H, J=7.4 Hz;
16ꢀCH2CH3), 2.51 (s, 48H; 16ꢀCH3-C), 4.46 (t, 16H, J=6.9 Hz;
SiCH2CH2CH2), 7.32 (d, 16H, JAB =8.2 Hz; 2ꢀCH Ar), 8.01 (d, 16H,
CH3-C7), 13.7 (CH3-C3, CH3-C5), 14.8 (CH
3ACHTUNGTRNEN(NUG CH2)3N), 17.2 (CH2CH3),
19.9 (CH2A(CH2)2N), 32.5 (CH2CH2N), 50.4 (CH2N), 119.9 (CH in 1,2,3-
CTHUNGTRENNUNG
triazole), 126.4 (CH phenyl), 129.0 (CH phenyl), 130.9, 131.4, 133.0,
135.7, 138.5, 139.9, 147.2, 153.9 ppm; UV/Vis (EtOAc): lmax (e)=522 nm
(108900 molÀ1 m3 cmÀ1); MS (API-ESI): m/z: 504.3 [M]+.
Preparation of solid polymeric samples: The new BDP derivatives were
incorporated into different solid matrices according to a previously de-
scribed procedure.[33] Solid monolith laser samples were cast in cylindrical
shape so as to form rods of 10 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length. A
cut was made parallel to the axis of the cylinder to obtain a lateral flat
surface of ꢀ6ꢀ10 mm. This surface, as well as the ends of the laser rods,
was prepared for lasing experiments by using a grinding and polishing
machine (Phoenix Beta 4000, Buehler) until an optical-grade finish was
obtained. The planar grinding stage was carried out with Texmet 1000
sandpaper (Buehler) using a diamond polishing compound of 6 mm as an
abrasive in mineral oil as a lubricant. The final polishing stage was realiz-
ed with a G-Tuch Microcloth (Buehler), using a Mastertex cloth disk
(Buehler) with diamond of 1 mm in mineral oil as an abrasive.
J
AB =8.2 Hz; 2ꢀCH Ar), 8.15 ppm (s, 8H; 1,2,3-triazole); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3): d=8.7 (SiCH2CH2CH2), 11.9 (CH3), 12.5 (CH3), 14.6
(CH3-CH2), 17.0 (CH3-CH2), 24.1 (SiCH2CH2CH2), 52.4 (SiCH2CH2CH2),
120.7 (CH in 1,2,3-triazole), 126.1 (CH phenyl), 129.0 (CH phenyl),
130.1, 131.2, 133.1, 135.8, 137.9, 139.2 (C in 1,2,3-triazole), 147.1,
154.0 ppm; 29Si NMR (79.5 MHz, CDCl3): d=À67.1 ppm; UV/Vis
(EtOAc): lmax =523 nm, e=432362 molÀ1 m3 cmÀ1; MALDI-TOF (2,5-di-
hydroxybenzoic acid matrix): m/z: 4304 [MÀF]+.
Photophysical properties: Photophysical properties were measured from
dilute solutions of the dyes (around 2ꢀ10À6 m), prepared by adding the
corresponding solvent to the residue from an appropriate amount of a
concentrated stock solution in acetone, after vacuum evaporation of this
solvent. UV/Vis absorption and fluorescence spectra were recorded on a
Cary 4E spectrophotometer and on a SPEX Fluorolog 3–22 spectro-
fluorimeter, respectively. Fluorescence quantum yields (f) were evaluat-
ed from corrected spectra, using a diluted solution of PM567 dye (Exci-
ton, laser grade) (f=0.91 in methanol) as a reference.[17] Radiative decay
curves were recorded by the time-correlated single-photon counting tech-
Mono-BDP–POSS 5: [CuACTHNUTRGNEUNG(C186tren)]Br (2.2 mg, 0.001 mmol) and
iPr2NEt (6.5 mL, 0.037 mmol) were added to a solution of azido-POSS 2
(134 mg, 0.123 mmol) and 4,4-difluoro-8-(4’-ethynylphenyl)-1,3,5,7-tetra-
methyl-2,6-diethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (3) (5 mg, 0.012 mmol)
in toluene (1 mL) under argon. The mixture was stirred for 6 h at 808C
under microwave irradiation. The solvent was then removed under re-
duced pressure and the residue was purified by flash column chromatog-
13266
ꢇ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 13258 – 13268