Full Paper
from 0.4 equiv to 1.1 equiv, but the yield slightly decreased
from 87% to 81% (Table 5, entries 6–8). The yield was im-
proved to 89% without affecting enantioselectivity when the
amount of diethylzinc was increased from 3 equiv to 5 equiv in
the presence of methanol (1.1 equiv) (Table 5, entries 8–10). A
further increase in the amount of methanol from 1.1 equiv to
2.2 equiv resulted in a slight increase in the enantioselectivity
to 93% (Table 5, entries 11–13). When the amount of 2a was
reduced to 0.1 equiv, the enantioselectivity and yield (Table 5,
entry 14) of the addition reaction were similar to the result of
entry 12. Interestingly, when the amount of methanol was re-
duced to 1.5 equiv, the enantioselectivity and yield were both
slightly decreased (Table 5, entry 15). The reaction took
a longer time for completion with lower enantioselectivity
when the amount of 2a was further reduced to 0.05 equiv
(Table 5, entry 16). Methanol was found to be the best achiral
additive so far in our catalytic system when compared with
other protic additives such as ethanol, 2-propanol, and water
(Table 5, entries 12, 17–19). N-Monosubstituted amino alcohol
2a exhibited higher enantioselectivity than their N,N-disubsti-
tuted congener 1 in this system (Table 5, entry 20).
imines bearing an ortho-substituted group gave a lower yield
along with the reduction product (Table 6, entries 1, 5, 8) than
meta-substituted and para-substituted imines. The reason is
presumably the steric hindrance imposed by the ortho-substi-
tuted group on the phenyl ring. Interestingly, the presence of
methanol could suppress the formation of reduction product
and enhance the yield of the addition product (Table 6, en-
tries 4–5).
Methylation of 3a with dimethylzinc (5 equiv) in the pres-
ence of a stoichiometric amount of 2a at 288C for 31 h gave
the addition product 5a in 92% yield with 97% ee (Table 7,
entry 1). The yield and enantioselectivity were decreased when
Table 7. Enantioselective addition of dimethylzinc to imine mediated by
2a.[a]
With the optimal conditions for the diethylzinc addition to
imine 3a (Table 5, entry 14) in hand, we examined the addition
to imines 3b–k to determine the scope and limitations. In the
presence of 2a, the addition of diethylzinc to imines 3b–k
gave the corresponding addition products in good enantiose-
lectivities (84-92%) and yields (60–92%) (Table 6). It should be
noted that the position of substitution on the phenyl ring of
the imine had a dramatic influence on the reaction. Generally,
Entry
2a [equiv]
t [h]
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5[d]
6[d]
7[d,e]
8[d]
1.0
0.6
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
31
48
48
48
48
72
72
72
92
75
64
33
71
70
78
77
97
99
94
87
96
95
93
95
[a] The reaction was conducted by using 5 equiv of Me2Zn (10 wt% in
hexanes) with imine (0.065m) in toluene/hexanes (1.6:1). [b] Isolated
yield. [c] Determined by HPLC using a Chiralcel OD-H column, and the ab-
solute configuration of the major isomer was assigned to be (R) by the
comparison of the optical rotation and the retention time with literature
data.[2–10] [d] MeOH (1.8 equiv) was added. [e] The reaction was conducted
by using 5 equiv of Me2Zn (1.2m in toluene) with imine (0.24m).
Table 6. The enantioselective addition of diethylzinc to N-(diphenyphos-
phinoyl)imines 3b–k catalyzed by 2a.[a]
the amount of 2a was decreased (Table 7, entries 2–4). Methyl-
ation of 3a in the presence of methanol (1.8 equiv) was also
found to improve both yield (71%) and enantioselectivity
(96%) when compared with the reaction in the absence of
methanol (Table 7, entries 4–5). No substantial change in yield
and enantioselectivity was observed on prolonging the reac-
tion time from 48 h to 72 h. When the reaction was conducted
either at a higher concentration (0.24m) or in the presence of
0.2 equiv of 2a, it resulted in a slight increase in the yield to
78% and 77%, respectively (Table 7, entries 7–8).
Entry
Ar
t [h]]
Yield [%][b,c]
ee [%][d]
1
2
3
4[e]
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
2-Tol
3-Tol
4-Tol
2-MeO-Ph
2-MeO-Ph
3-MeO-Ph
4-MeO-Ph
2-Cl-Ph
41
44
30
24
44
30
30
41
43
30
40
60(b)(24)
76(c)(8)
83(d)(4)
52(e)(47)
71(e)(28)
87(f)(6)
86(g)
68(h)(24)
84(i)(6)
86(j)(3)
92(k)
89
89
92
79
87
88
91
84
85
89
84
3-Cl-Ph
4-Cl-Ph
4-MeO2C-Ph
The presence of a small amount of methanol not only en-
hanced the catalytic cycle but also improved the enantioselec-
tivity. The exact role of methanol in our catalytic system is not
fully understood at this stage.[14,15] However, based on litera-
ture reports,[2a,b,8b,13] the rationale of the stereochemical out-
come of the addition reaction is shown in Figure 2. The coordi-
nation of imine and chiral aminoalcohol to both zinc atoms
would lead to a favored bicyclic transition state A. The transfer
of one of the ethyl groups on ZnB to imine 3 would then give
[a] The reaction was conducted by using Et2Zn (5 equiv) and MeOH
(1.8 equiv) with imine (0.072m) in toluene/hexanes (1.76:1). [b] Isolated
yield. [c] In brackets, yields of the corresponding reduction products.
[d] Determined by HPLC using Chiralcel OD-H or AS-H column, and the
absolute configuration of the major isomer was assigned to be (R) by the
comparison of the optical rotation and the retention time with literature
data;[2–10] Products 4 f and 4k were tentatively assigned to be (R) by the
retention times of the enantiomers on HPLC analysis according the obser-
vations with products 4c and 4d. [e] Without MeOH.
&
&
Chem. Asian J. 2014, 00, 0 – 0
4
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!