A. Siddiqui et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 635–640
639
Expression of Beclin-1 is known to be suppressed in breast cancers
and its overexpression is reported to inhibit breast cancer.48 Thus,
induction of Beclin-1 by resveratrol analogs may be of therapeutic
advantage in prevention against breast cancer. The ability of resve-
ratrol to induce autophagy leading cell death has been noted only
in case of ovarian, colon and chronic myelogenous leukemia
cells.51–53
Present work has thus indicated that substitution of appropriate
groups with favorable stereochemistry on the resveratrol motif
along with imino-functionality between the two rings may prove
advantageous for tailoring these molecules for use as therapeutic
agents against breast cancer.
Figure 5. Induction of Beclin-1 protein expression by Aza-resveratrol analogs 3b
and 3f. Representative Western blots to show the protein expression of Beclin-1 in
MDA-MB-231 and T47D breast cancer cells treated with resveratrol (50
lM), 3b
(50 M) or 3e (50 M) for 12 h. Thirty microgram total protein from cell lines was
l
l
size fractionated on a 12% SDS–polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto a PVDF
membrane under standard conditions. Beclin-1 primary antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was used for immunodetection. The same mem-
Supplementary data
brane was stripped and incubated with
luminescent detection was performed using the BM Chemiluminescence Detection
kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN).
a-tubulin antibody (Santa Cruz). Chemi-
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
References and notes
performed molecular docking of these resveratrol analogs into ER-
a
protein cavity in order compare their binding profiles towards
this biomarker. Compounds 3a–f were found to dock into the ac-
tive site of ER- with a good fit indicating that substitutions em-
1. Jemal, A.; Bray, F.; Center, M. M.; Ferlay, J.; Ward, E.; Forman, D. CA Cancer J.
Clin. 2011, 61, 69.
2. Glass, A. G.; Lacey, J. V., Jr.; Carreon, J. D.; Hoover, R. N. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2007,
99, 1152.
3. Gluz, O.; Liedtke, C.; Gottschalk, N.; Pusztai, L.; Nitz, U.; Harbeck, N. Ann. Oncol.
1913, 2009, 20.
4. Siegel, R.; Naishadham, D.; Jemal, A. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2012, 62, 10.
5. Deroo, B. J.; Korach, K. S. J. Clin. Invest. 2006, 116, 561.
6. Irvin, W. J., Jr.; Carey, L. A. Eur. J. Cancer 2008, 44, 2799.
7. Reis-Filho, J. S.; Tutt, A. N. Histopathology 2008, 52, 108.
8. Sirtori, C. R.; Arnoldi, A.; Johnson, S. K. Ann. Med. 2005, 37, 423.
9. Adlercreutz, H. Lancet Oncol. 2002, 3, 364.
a
ployed by us do not introduce any major steric changes except
allowing additional hydrogen bonding interactions (Fig. 3, Table 2).
Compounds 3a–f exhibited binding energies in the range of À6.8–
À8.2 Kcal/mol compared to resveratrol, which suggest tight bind-
ing in the active site of ER-
a protein cavity. The compound 3e
has shown the highest stable binding energy where vicinal hydro-
xyl groups on ring A undergo hydrogen bonding interaction with
HIS524 (2.5 and 2.2 Å) residues while methyl group interacted
with ARG394 (3.0 Å) and GLU354 (2.6 Å) residues, respectively.
Resveratrol exhibits only one hydrogen bonding interaction with
ARG394 (3.0 Å) via para-hydroxyl group on B ring. It was apparent
that the 3, 4-dihydroxyl groups on ring A in compounds 3a–3e fa-
vor more Van der Waals interactions with amino acid residues in
10. Setchell, K. D. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 1333S.
11. Le Bail, J. C.; Champavier, Y.; Chulia, A. J.; Habrioux, G. Life Sci. 2000, 66, 1281.
12. Mense, S. M.; Hei, T. K.; Ganju, R. K.; Bhat, H. K. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008,
116, 426.
13. Saiko, P.; Szakmary, A.; Jaeger, W.; Szekeres, T. Mutat. Res. 2008, 658, 68.
14. Lee, M. F.; Pan, M. H.; Chiou, Y. S.; Cheng, A. C.; Huang, H. J. Agric. Food Chem.
2011, 59, 11853.
15. Vergara, D.; Valente, C. M.; Tinelli, A.; Siciliano, C.; Lorusso, V.; Acierno, R.;
Giovinazzo, G.; Santino, A.; Storelli, C.; Maffia, M. Cancer Lett. 2011, 310, 1.
16. Filomeni, G.; Graziani, I.; Rotilio, G.; Ciriolo, M. R. Genes Nutr. 2007, 2, 295.
17. Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Xing, K.; Wang, Y.; Li, F.; Yao, L. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
2006, 135, 181.
18. Nguyen, T. H.; Mustafa, F. B.; Pervaiz, S.; Ng, F. S.; Lim, L. H. Int. J. Oncol. 2008,
33, 81.
19. Alkhalaf, M. Pharmacology 2007, 80, 134.
20. Alkhalaf, M.; El-Mowafy, A.; Renno, W.; Rachid, O.; Ali, A.; Al-Attyiah, R. Arch.
Med. Res. 2008, 39, 162.
21. Tang, H. Y.; Shih, A.; Cao, H. J.; Davis, F. B.; Davis, P. J.; Lin, H. Y. Mol. Cancer Ther.
2006, 5, 2034.
22. Banerjee, S.; Bueso-Ramos, C.; Aggarwal, B. B. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 4945.
23. Bhat, K. P.; Lantvit, D.; Christov, K.; Mehta, R. G.; Moon, R. C.; Pezzuto, J. M.
Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 7456.
24. Wang, R. H.; Zheng, Y.; Kim, H. S.; Xu, X.; Cao, L.; Luhasen, T.; Lee, M. H.; Xiao,
C.; Vassilopoulos, A.; Chen, W.; Gardner, K.; Man, Y. G.; Hung, M. C.; Finkel, T.;
Deng, C. X. Mol. Cell 2008, 32, 11.
25. Schlachterman, A.; Valle, F.; Wall, K. M.; Azios, N. G.; Castillo, L.; Morell, L.;
Washington, A. V.; Cubano, L. A.; Dharmawardhane, S. F. Transl. Oncol. 2008, 1,
19.
26. Garvin, S.; Ollinger, K.; Dabrosin, C. Cancer Lett. 2006, 231, 113.
27. Walle, T.; Hsieh, F.; DeLegge, M. H.; Oatis, J. E., Jr.; Walle, U. K. Drug Metab.
Dispos. 2004, 32, 1377.
the ER-
protein cavity.
a protein leading to stabilization of these ligands into the
The newly synthesized compounds were tested and compared
with resveratrol for their cytotoxic effects against triple negative
MDA-MB-231 and progesterone receptor rich T47D human breast
cancer cell lines as well as MCF-10A human normal breast cell line
using MTT assay. All compounds exhibited cytotoxic effects against
MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 4A) and T47D (Fig. 4B) breast cancer cell lines at
50 lM concentration. Compounds 3b and 3e exhibited most potent
activity against MDA-MB-231(with 65–75% cytotoxicity) and T47D
cells (with 40–60% cytotoxicity), while resveratrol induced only
40% cytotoxicity against both cell lines tested. The compounds 3b
and 3e exhibited IC50 value of 21 and 29
231, and 32 and 44 M against T47D breast cancer cell lines,
respectively, as compared to resveratrol with IC50 value of 66 and
76 M, respectively. The compound 3f exhibited 40% cytotoxicity
against T47D cells at 50 M, but was ineffective to induce cytotox-
lM against MDA-MB-
l
l
l
icity in MDA-MB-231 cells. None of the newly synthesized resvera-
trol analogs exhibited any cytotoxic effects against MCF-10A cells
28. Asensi, M.; Medina, I.; Ortega, A.; Carretero, J.; Bano, M. C.; Obrador, E.; Estrela,
J. M. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002, 33, 387.
29. Ahmad, A.; Farhan Asad, S.; Singh, S.; Hadi, S. M. Cancer Lett. 2000, 154, 29.
30. Gao, X.; Xu, Y. X.; Divine, G.; Janakiraman, N.; Chapman, R. A.; Gautam, S. C. J.
Nutr. 2002, 132, 2076.
31. Roberti, M.; Pizzirani, D.; Simoni, D.; Rondanin, R.; Baruchello, R.; Bonora, C.;
Buscemi, F.; Grimaudo, S.; Tolomeo, M. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3546.
32. Pan, M. H.; Gao, J. H.; Lai, C. S.; Wang, Y. J.; Chen, W. M.; Lo, C. Y.; Wang, M.;
Dushenkov, S.; Ho, C. T. Mol. Carcinog. 2008, 47, 184.
33. Moran, B. W.; Anderson, F. P.; Devery, A.; Cloonan, S.; Butler, W. E.; Varughese,
S.; Draper, S. M.; Kenny, P. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 4510.
34. Colin, D.; Gimazane, A.; Lizard, G.; Izard, J. C.; Solary, E.; Latruffe, N.; Delmas, D.
Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 2780.
35. Wang, T. T.; Schoene, N. W.; Kim, Y. S.; Mizuno, C. S.; Rimando, A. M. Mol. Nutr.
Food Res. 2010, 54, 335.
at 50 lM concentration (Fig. 4C) suggesting its safety towards nor-
mal breast cells and selectivity to cancer cells. Resveratrol is
known to induce apoptosis but our newly synthesized resveratrol
analogs 3b and 3e seem to inhibit cell growth through autophagy-
mediated cell death.26 The protein isolates from MDA-MB-231
and T47D cell lines were analyzed for the protein expression of
Beclin-1 by standard Western blotting techniques.49,50 Induction
of Beclin-1 protein (an indicator for autophagy)47 in MDA-MB-231
and T47D cells after treatment with 3b or 3e indicated
autophagy-mediated inhibition of growth in these cells (Fig. 5).